- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Teen Vogue: “Yes, abortion can be funny.”
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:20 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:20 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
OH JESUS NOT A TITTY.
Think of the children!
I've got the vapors just reading about it. I too long for the days when our grandparents covered their boosoms and shite in holes in the ground - at least they knew how to do it with dignity.
For real, if a breastfeeding woman offends you, it says a whole hell of a lot more about you than her.
Think of the children!
I've got the vapors just reading about it. I too long for the days when our grandparents covered their boosoms and shite in holes in the ground - at least they knew how to do it with dignity.
For real, if a breastfeeding woman offends you, it says a whole hell of a lot more about you than her.
0
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:22 pm to TigerChief10
quote:You are mistaken.
The issue wasn't whether or not it complied with their laws. The issue was you taking up for big gov. It's obvious you're just a contrarian anyways though so no need to have the same argument we had a couple months ago. We will never agree on it.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:23 pm to Ebbandflow
quote:
If he was aborted now that would be called Murder
As a communist, he isn’t a person. You can’t murder something that isn’t human.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:26 pm to FooManChoo
quote:The question is application of the NAP. Clearly it applies to the woman. The debate is whether it sppies to the blastocyst/embryo/fetus. We had a 20-page thread on this issue a few days ago. I do not think it applies. A minority of libertarians disagree.
It seems to me that the only way you can support abortion is to deny that the unborn is a living human being that has certain rights that shouldn't be violated. If so, can you determine when a child actually has these rights bestowed on it and what the basis of your determination is?
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:53 pm to AggieHank86
quote:I apologize for not being caught up but what was your conclusion about when rights are bestowed upon children? Someone said that you were talking about sentience. Is that accurate?
The question is application of the NAP. Clearly it applies to the woman. The debate is whether it sppies to the blastocyst/embryo/fetus. We had a 20-page thread on this issue a few days ago. I do not think it applies. A minority of libertarians disagree.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:55 pm to CommoDawg
quote:
It can be funny when it's a punch-line
It would have been funnier if your mom would have aborted you.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:59 pm to berrycajun
Teen Vogue also had an article about the joys of anal sex.
Now mind you...magazine demos are always about 5 years younger than the supposed audience...because young people want to be older and that's what they think older girls are reading.
So really 10 year olds are Teen Vogue's demographic - not 16 year olds who are reading regular Vogue and Cosmo.
Terrible magazine culture that nobody monitors.
Now mind you...magazine demos are always about 5 years younger than the supposed audience...because young people want to be older and that's what they think older girls are reading.
So really 10 year olds are Teen Vogue's demographic - not 16 year olds who are reading regular Vogue and Cosmo.
Terrible magazine culture that nobody monitors.
This post was edited on 7/19/18 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 7/19/18 at 7:46 pm to FT
quote:
If you believe that property includes your body, you can do whatever you like with it.
I wonder how this would work with conjoined twins?
Posted on 7/19/18 at 7:49 pm to Ebbandflow
quote:
Difference between Trump and I?
Trump and me
Posted on 7/19/18 at 7:51 pm to Phil A Sheo
quote:
Why are they worried about abortions?? No one wants to frick those ugly broads...
They don’t have black dudes where you live?
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:00 pm to Brazos
quote:
What ever happened to " abortion should be legal but rare"?
This line of thinking always struck me as odd. If you believe abortion is a such a good thing, why in the hell would you want it to be rare? What would making a good thing rare accomplish? Seems like the only reason somebody would want abortion to be rare is because they innately know the practice is shameful, evil, or immoral.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 9:07 pm to FooManChoo
quote:The ideologically-comsistent answer is personhood/sentience/self-awarness (all essentially the same as far as I am concerneed ... not going to get tangled in semantics), but I am not an ideologue. I think 1st trimester is a reasonable compromise. It gives the woman an adequate time to exercise her rights, but estops her well-before any reasonable person could assert that “sentience” has arrived.
I apologize for not being caught up but what was your conclusion about when rights are bestowed upon children? Someone said that you were talking about sentience. Is that accurate?
This post was edited on 7/19/18 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 7/19/18 at 9:21 pm to HonoraryCoonass
quote:Don’t be unnecessarily obtuse. VERY few people think abortion is a “good thing” in the sense that you use the term. They/we think that it is an option that should be available to people in a difficult situation.quote:This line of thinking always struck me as odd. If you believe abortion is a such a good thing, why in the hell would you want it to be rare?
What ever happened to " abortion should be legal but rare"?
I lack the hubris to pretend that I KNOW the answer to “when rights SHOULD vest.” I have studied the issue, and I certainly have opinions that I think are reasonable, but I acknowledge the value of other views as well ... such as those Rusty expressed. I would hope that most reasonable people (on both sides) lack that hubis.
As such, I would prefer that it be only rare occasions that anyone is forced to implement their views.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 9:23 pm to berrycajun
quote:
Whether you support abortion or not, there is NOTHING funny about killing a human baby. NOTHING.
Well you're just wrong.
Time+Tragedy=Comedy
This just isn't funny.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 9:58 pm to berrycajun
quote:
abortion
quote:
killing a human baby
Nope.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 9:59 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I lack the hubris
Fake news
Posted on 7/20/18 at 10:08 am to AggieHank86
quote:Mind if I ask why you've settled on sentience and self-awareness to determine personhood? I only ask because, depending on the study, infants don't start developing consciousness and storing memories until about 5 months after being born. Being self-aware may not start until almost a year old.
The ideologically-comsistent answer is personhood/sentience/self-awarness (all essentially the same as far as I am concerneed ... not going to get tangled in semantics), but I am not an ideologue.
With that being the case, do you consider newborns up to 5 or 12 months old "persons", and if so, what is the distinction you are making between them and the unborn in terms of what you've stated qualifies someone/something as a person?
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News