- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/21/26 at 7:30 am to Eurocat
Yeah, he should have let Thune carry this through the Senate to show the same strong leadership he showed on the SAVE act. Oh, wait….
Idiots. The ONLY way he’s been able to accomplish anything with all the obstructionists from his own party thwarting him to to bypass them completely.
Idiots. The ONLY way he’s been able to accomplish anything with all the obstructionists from his own party thwarting him to to bypass them completely.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 7:34 am to southofyou
Didn't Trump say taxpayers were going to get Tariff checks? Is this going to be like when we didn't get DOGE checks?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 7:36 am to Ten Bears
quote:
Yet no one wil hold the certain someone responsible accountable
What you expected the judge to do, order Trump to personally write and sign every check like in the movie the Jerk.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 7:37 am to Cuz413
Oh look a cuckservative begging for gov stimmy
Classic
Classic
Posted on 4/21/26 at 7:37 am to southofyou
You do know they are still assessing Tariffs, right? SCOTUS gave Trump green light on most of the Tariffs
Posted on 4/21/26 at 7:48 am to BlueDogTiger
quote:
SCOTUS gave Trump green light on most of the Tariffs
Trump never lacked the ability to issue tariffs legally. The USSC didn't "give" him anything.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 9:38 am to Nosevens
quote:
The so called payment back will be interesting as companies have to show their losses and not passed on forward to customers. If customers were charged higher prices due to tariffs then those compare not able to collect
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
"It's brilliant if they don't do that. Actually, if they don't do that, they, they got to know me very well. I'm very honored by what you just said. If they don't do that, I'll remember them."
the full interview:
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 9:43 am
Posted on 4/21/26 at 9:39 am to southofyou
Nothing is going to be paid to these leaches. Nor should it be.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:18 am to Nosevens
quote:
The so called payment back will be interesting as companies have to show their losses and not passed on forward to customers. If customers were charged higher prices due to tariffs then those compare not able to collect
Do they have to prove that? i hope so but hadn't heard that.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:19 am to RobertFootball
quote:
The American taxpayer was on the hook and getting f***ed 6 ways from Sunday long before Trump implemented tarrifs.
Now we get fricked 7 ways from Sunday.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:28 am to Ailsa
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
"The Supreme Court didn't want to SAVE our country with one sentence, $165 billion! And we're giving a lot of that money back to people that HATE OUR COUNTRY. So I'm NOT happy with the Supreme Court!"
"We're being SUCKED DRY!"
"We had a SETBACK with the Supreme Court...because of what they did, we have to pay $165 BILLION DOLLARS!"
"All they had to do is add one sentence: you don't have to pay what you've taken in thus far back."
"We lost by just 2 votes! Little 2 votes. We have to pay back $165 BILLION! With one sentence, you don't have to pay back tariffs. Start from this point."
"It's a little more unwieldy, but it's the way it's been done."
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:44 am to roadGator
quote:
7 is better than 6, no?
.gif)
Posted on 4/21/26 at 11:00 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Oh look a cuckservative begging for gov stimmy
I don't want a stimulus you dumb frick, I want the inflated difference from when companies charged me for tariffs.
Only an idiot would be ok with the Government collecting the tariffs, companies raising prices because of it, and then the companies getting reimbursed by the taxpayers, while the Government still has the money.
You are special kind of stupid.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:42 pm to Icansee4miles
quote:
Yeah, he should have let Thune carry this through the Senate to show the same strong leadership he showed on the SAVE act. Oh, wait….
Idiots. The ONLY way he’s been able to accomplish anything with all the obstructionists from his own party thwarting him to to bypass them completely.
You only support the checks-and-balances system — which, by the way, was established by our funding principles — when it's not your favored leader attempting to bend it to his will.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:51 pm to Eurocat
quote:
The problem with the White House is when they want to do something they just up and do it rather than going through the right process. Not everything can be done by Trump just signing a paper and calling it an executive order - go do it.
Think through the current state of both parties in congress, and then come to the conclusion on why he did it via EO. Republicans are too chicken shite to put their name on anything. Everyone screams term limits but the people are the term limits. Look at our long standing members of the LA delegation. Louisiana has the fricking speaker of the house AND the majority leader in its delegation and frick all has been accomplished.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:53 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
Think through the current state of both parties in congress, and then come to the conclusion on why he did it via EO.
What he said applies to EOs
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
No shite slow. My point is he did it knowing congress would never act.perhaps he had some kind of initial glimmer of hope that they would codify the EO through legislation, but they've accomplished nothing so far.
You don't always have to act like you're the smartest person in the room, people would be much more willing to engage in conversation if you weren't always trying to play gotcha or be a contrarian.
You don't always have to act like you're the smartest person in the room, people would be much more willing to engage in conversation if you weren't always trying to play gotcha or be a contrarian.
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 12:56 pm
Popular
Back to top



0






