- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:38 am to udtiger
quote:
Just so I am clear, when the President or one of his empowered representatives makes furnishing of aid contingent on certain actions being taken by another country, that's always an abuse of power and impeachable?
Only a sith deals in absolutes
Private Message: Just to be clear are you still playing the part of a moderate who hates both parties?...Click here to remove this message.
You could just interact with me in a thread instead of banning me again because you think i'm a hypocrite
This post was edited on 10/29/19 at 7:41 am
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:40 am to bmy
lolololol nice hypocrisy deflection
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:47 am to Strannix
quote:
lolololol nice hypocrisy deflection
It's not hypocrisy
It CAN be inappropriate. If the DOJ had opened up an investigation into the matter I would have no problem with it.
But they did not. Instead.. they try to backdoor an investigation much like the dems did with Mueller
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:55 am to TrueTiger
quote:Repubs are open season, make up any lie and sell it brother, preach!
This new political math is odd.
You can get immunity from prosecution by just running for office as a Democrat.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:56 am to Strannix
By the time Durham and Barr get their heads out of the clouds, Trump will have either been impeached or lost the 2020 election with the new President firing Barr and covering up everything the Dems and Obama did for years.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:56 am to bmy
No, the difference is they are taking the President at his word, because we can’t prove ill intent.
They FEEL like what Biden did could be construed as wrongdoing, so that is an abuse of power and should have been investigated.
(See what I did there guys, I switched the names and it all still works!)
They FEEL like what Biden did could be construed as wrongdoing, so that is an abuse of power and should have been investigated.
(See what I did there guys, I switched the names and it all still works!)
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:58 am to Strannix
I don’t think A&1 is appropriate on steak
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:08 am to Strannix
quote:Presidential phone calls are classified information. Releasing any details I’d said calls are a federal crime. This rat should be charged with violating that law...
Swamp Rat to testify "he didn't think Trump call was proper"
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:12 am to Strannix
quote:
Swamp Rat to testify "he didn't think Trump call was proper"

Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:15 am to Strannix
Do not EVER allow an O-5 officer do your thinking for you.

Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:16 am to bmy
quote:
Private Message: Just to be clear are you still playing the part of a moderate who hates both parties?...Click here to remove this message.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:20 am to bmy
quote:
You could just interact with me in a thread instead of banning me again because you think i'm a hypocrite
Ohh... can we put it to a vote?
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:25 am to Bunyan
No because he was appointed by Obama
Left over Obama plant...fire his azz
Left over Obama plant...fire his azz
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:26 am to Strannix
Dont care what he “thinks” . We have the transcript. Good day sir !


This post was edited on 10/29/19 at 8:32 am
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:29 am to Strannix
quote:
“I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine,”
OMG..
This is EXACTLY what the DNC did with chalupa and ukraine to then citizen trump through manafort.
twilight zone.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:30 am to DeathAndTaxes
quote:
No, the difference is they are taking the President at his word, because we can’t prove ill intent.
They FEEL like what Biden did could be construed as wrongdoing, so that is an abuse of power and should have been investigated.
(See what I did there guys, I switched the names and it all still works!)
Assume Trump's intent is to take out a political opponent and also assume that Biden used the influence of his office to end an investigation of his son.
Does the propriety of the investigation turn on Trump's subjective intent or Joe's actions?
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:36 am to SSpaniel
quote:
Ohh... can we put it to a vote?
Pro-censorship repubs?
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:38 am to bmy
quote:
Pro-censorship repubs?
I said put it to a vote. That's pro democracy, is it not?
Besides, I would never want to silence you, you bring so much to the table...
in terms of things for us to laugh at...
This post was edited on 10/29/19 at 8:40 am
Popular
Back to top



0






