Started By
Message

re: Swamp Rat to testify "he didn't think Trump call was proper"

Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:24 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135453 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:24 am to
quote:

Swamp Rat to testify "he didn't think Trump call was proper"
Tough!
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:38 am to
quote:

Just so I am clear, when the President or one of his empowered representatives makes furnishing of aid contingent on certain actions being taken by another country, that's always an abuse of power and impeachable?



Only a sith deals in absolutes

Private Message: Just to be clear are you still playing the part of a moderate who hates both parties?...Click here to remove this message.

You could just interact with me in a thread instead of banning me again because you think i'm a hypocrite
This post was edited on 10/29/19 at 7:41 am
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
52843 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:40 am to
lolololol nice hypocrisy deflection
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:47 am to
quote:

lolololol nice hypocrisy deflection


It's not hypocrisy

It CAN be inappropriate. If the DOJ had opened up an investigation into the matter I would have no problem with it.

But they did not. Instead.. they try to backdoor an investigation much like the dems did with Mueller
Posted by Sidicous
NELA
Member since Aug 2015
19296 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:55 am to
quote:

This new political math is odd.

You can get immunity from prosecution by just running for office as a Democrat.
Repubs are open season, make up any lie and sell it brother, preach!
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
20657 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:56 am to
By the time Durham and Barr get their heads out of the clouds, Trump will have either been impeached or lost the 2020 election with the new President firing Barr and covering up everything the Dems and Obama did for years.
Posted by DeathAndTaxes
Member since Oct 2019
238 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:56 am to
No, the difference is they are taking the President at his word, because we can’t prove ill intent.

They FEEL like what Biden did could be construed as wrongdoing, so that is an abuse of power and should have been investigated.

(See what I did there guys, I switched the names and it all still works!)
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6474 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 7:58 am to
I don’t think A&1 is appropriate on steak
Posted by alatxtgr
The Nation of Texas
Member since Sep 2006
2383 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Swamp Rat to testify "he didn't think Trump call was proper"
Presidential phone calls are classified information. Releasing any details I’d said calls are a federal crime. This rat should be charged with violating that law...
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Swamp Rat to testify "he didn't think Trump call was proper"



Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53478 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:15 am to
Do not EVER allow an O-5 officer do your thinking for you.

Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Private Message: Just to be clear are you still playing the part of a moderate who hates both parties?...Click here to remove this message.

Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:20 am to
quote:

You could just interact with me in a thread instead of banning me again because you think i'm a hypocrite


Ohh... can we put it to a vote?
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6474 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:22 am to
Lmao
Posted by Bow08tie
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2011
4521 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:25 am to
No because he was appointed by Obama

Left over Obama plant...fire his azz
Posted by DreauxB2015
Member since Nov 2015
7908 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:26 am to
Dont care what he “thinks” . We have the transcript. Good day sir !

This post was edited on 10/29/19 at 8:32 am
Posted by bayouvette
Raceland
Member since Oct 2005
5579 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:29 am to
quote:

“I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine,”


OMG..

This is EXACTLY what the DNC did with chalupa and ukraine to then citizen trump through manafort.

twilight zone.
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14977 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:30 am to
quote:

No, the difference is they are taking the President at his word, because we can’t prove ill intent.

They FEEL like what Biden did could be construed as wrongdoing, so that is an abuse of power and should have been investigated.

(See what I did there guys, I switched the names and it all still works!)



Assume Trump's intent is to take out a political opponent and also assume that Biden used the influence of his office to end an investigation of his son.

Does the propriety of the investigation turn on Trump's subjective intent or Joe's actions?
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Ohh... can we put it to a vote?


Pro-censorship repubs?
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 10/29/19 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Pro-censorship repubs?


I said put it to a vote. That's pro democracy, is it not?

Besides, I would never want to silence you, you bring so much to the table...








in terms of things for us to laugh at...
This post was edited on 10/29/19 at 8:40 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram