- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:00 am to ksayetiger
WHY THE frick ARE WILL STILL WASTING TIME ON THIS NONSENSE
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:01 am to Antonio Moss
Big fan? Go to a lot of women's games?
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:14 am to ksayetiger
Interesting that they're only discussing bio men joining women's teams. I wonder why they're not including bio women joining men's teams? 
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:15 am to ksayetiger
We call this Progressive Fragility
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:16 am to Anastasia Beaverhousen
quote:
Interesting that they're only discussing bio men joining women's teams. I wonder why they're not including bio women joining men's teams?
The SCOTUS will handle that too
Posted on 7/3/25 at 12:08 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
quote:
Big fan? Go to a lot of women's games?
No, not at all. But athletics is one of, if not the best teachers of life skills -things like overcoming adversity, team work, etc. Why would we want to deny those experiences to girls?
Posted on 7/3/25 at 12:25 pm to Slingscode
quote:
I like women's gymnastics
Meh, they are usually so tiny they look like little girls, Women's volleyball on the other hand...
Posted on 7/3/25 at 12:58 pm to Antonio Moss
They can still play in rec leagues. I just mean high school / college / professional should be done away with.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:01 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
quote:
I just mean high school / college / professional should be done away with.
Get rid of girls’ high school sports?
Like I said, it was a retarded post
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:03 pm to Antonio Moss
If you get rid of college and pro (you agree with me on this) I don't see any point in wasting money on high school.
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:11 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
I didn’t agree to that. I think getting rid of women’s sports in college is stupid.
Pro? It’s a business. If it makes money or someone foolishly subsidizes it, ok.
And the idea that you would get rid of HS sports because there isn’t a college equivalent makes zero sense considering only 3% of HS athletes play sports in college.
Pro? It’s a business. If it makes money or someone foolishly subsidizes it, ok.
And the idea that you would get rid of HS sports because there isn’t a college equivalent makes zero sense considering only 3% of HS athletes play sports in college.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:12 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
transgender athletes
Well this should be easy since a “transgender” doesn’t exist. You are either male or female. Pretty straight forward.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:14 pm to td01241
quote:
I hope they go so far as to say Trans isn’t a protected class under the civil rights act.
How could it be? It doesn’t exist. Male or female is pretty simple to determine.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:15 pm to Antonio Moss
Glad we found a common ground. Now keep on keepin' on you retard!
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:35 pm to RobbBobb
The answer seems easy enough. The premise behind the transgender movement is that sex does not equal gender.
The segregation of sports is historically based on biological/physiological differences in the sexes. This otherwise discriminatory segregation has historically been justified due to this biological difference based on sex and is even supported by the enactment of Title XI.
A law that enforces segregation of sports based on a historically accepted basis of sex should be legal even if its has the secondary effect of segregating/discriminating based on gender.
The movement can't have it both ways. If sex does not equal gender when it supports their arguments then sex does not equal gender has to still be true when it cuts against them as well.
*edited since apparently the unequal sign changes to ?
The segregation of sports is historically based on biological/physiological differences in the sexes. This otherwise discriminatory segregation has historically been justified due to this biological difference based on sex and is even supported by the enactment of Title XI.
A law that enforces segregation of sports based on a historically accepted basis of sex should be legal even if its has the secondary effect of segregating/discriminating based on gender.
The movement can't have it both ways. If sex does not equal gender when it supports their arguments then sex does not equal gender has to still be true when it cuts against them as well.
*edited since apparently the unequal sign changes to ?
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:45 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Cases Involving Transgender Athletes
This is all so stupid. You're a biological male but you think you're a girl? Mazel tov. No one GAF. But you want to hang out in the girls locker room, and dominate females in the boxing ring and the swimming pool? Now we care. Why is this even a discussion? Who TF is actually confused by this issue?
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:03 pm to ksayetiger
And they will allow the bans against trannys
The bans don't discriminate against males or females. Both genders of the mentally ill are treated alike.
Next?
The bans don't discriminate against males or females. Both genders of the mentally ill are treated alike.
Next?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News