- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Study: All Humanity Comes From One Couple.................... You don't say
Posted on 11/27/18 at 1:43 pm to blackrose890
Posted on 11/27/18 at 1:43 pm to blackrose890
quote:
The fact that they are both an estimate of years is irrelevant
Because it suits you. He is attacking the estimates to refute it.
quote:
as they do not compare similar effects
THIS is what is irrelevant.
quote:
You didn't read the article,
I did.
1
Posted on 11/27/18 at 1:43 pm to Yak
quote:
Yeah I wouldn't either in this 'argument' of yours
What is my argument sir?
Posted on 11/27/18 at 1:44 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
I did.
Then your reading comprehension is inferior to even your ability to form a coherent argument.
This post was edited on 11/27/18 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 11/27/18 at 1:45 pm to jptiger2009
quote:
So, what's your point with all of this?
To prove that we all came from 1 man and 1 woman who had 3 sons (Seth?) and one was murdered.
Where did I say that?
quote:
Let's then assume
Let's not. Why? Because I didn't.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 1:47 pm to Jjdoc
What? I'm going by what the Bible gives us.
Your original point was to prove that we descended from 2 people, and I asked you simple questions after that. You can't answer them?
Your original point was to prove that we descended from 2 people, and I asked you simple questions after that. You can't answer them?
Posted on 11/27/18 at 1:47 pm to Joshjrn
So far I think you and I are the only 2.
quote:
Anyone want to take a stab at an over/under on how many on this thread have actually read it?
Posted on 11/27/18 at 1:50 pm to Displaced
quote:
Scientifically speaking, how would a "global flood" work?
Global warming of course.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 1:53 pm to blackrose890
quote:
Then your reading comprehension is inferior to even your ability to form a coherent argument.
When are you going to answer the question? Why do you claim that the Moon is a ball of gas?
Posted on 11/27/18 at 1:54 pm to jptiger2009
quote:
Your original point was to prove that we descended from 2 people, and I asked you simple questions after that. You can't answer them?
Did I? Which 2 people?
Posted on 11/27/18 at 1:56 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Why do you claim that the Moon is a ball of gas?
I have never made such a claim nor would make such a claim. I don't understand the point of your question, except to distract from the embarrassment you are incurring.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 2:01 pm to Jjdoc
quote:This is why I put the word 'argument' in quotes - you don't really have one, and likely never will, judging by your comments in this thread.
What is my argument sir?
Posted on 11/27/18 at 2:01 pm to blackrose890
quote:
I have never made such a claim nor would make such a claim.
Oh.. So making false claims about what a poster said is not acceptable?
I thought it was.
It's been done in this thread a lot. Just playing by the rules.
quote:
I don't understand the point of your question
Oh trust me, I understand you don't.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 2:03 pm to Yak
quote:
This is why I put the word 'argument' in quotes - you don't really have one, and likely never will, judging by your comments in this thread.
So you feel that because I don't come down on one side or the other on how old the earth is, I have no argument based on the OP?
Posted on 11/27/18 at 2:05 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Oh.. So making false claims about what a poster said is not acceptable?
Where did I make false claims? It is rather obvious you either lack intelligence or are ignorant. If you are referring to the Hovind question, it is because you are all but stating your are a biblical literalist.
quote:
Oh trust me, I understand you don't.
Back again with cheap talk instead of reading anything critically? You are ignoring 90% of the meat of anything posted to you just to try and score points. You still don't understand the articles posted and have ignored the actual paper.
This post was edited on 11/27/18 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 11/27/18 at 2:06 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
So you feel that because I don't come down on one side or the other on how old the earth is, I have no argument based on the OP?
I think he feels that if you were to take a side you would invite debate you couldn't support or properly engage in.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 2:07 pm to Jjdoc
quote:I am saying that you have no argument - period.
So you feel that because I don't come down on one side or the other on how old the earth is, I have no argument based on the OP?
Would you care to elaborate on what your argument actually is?
Posted on 11/27/18 at 2:14 pm to blackrose890
quote:It's a valid argument. But first, I'd like to get beyond the whole 'playing coy' vibe this guy has going on
I think he feels that if you were to take a side you would invite debate you couldn't support or properly engage in.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 2:22 pm to Jjdoc
One study huh? How many times have I've seen people use one study to push an agenda 
When a majority of scientists agree with this study then I might listen
When a majority of scientists agree with this study then I might listen
Posted on 11/27/18 at 2:23 pm to blackrose890
quote:
t is because you are all but stating your are a biblical literalist
There is one example. So what about your claim of the moon being a ball of gas?
See how easy it is? Nowhere did I make a claim of any kind. You decided that must be my position even though I clearly stated I do not have a position on it. In fact, I stated it several times.
Yet, here you are personally attacking me as the one who can not comprehend what I am reading.
Posted on 11/27/18 at 2:26 pm to bleedpg
quote:
I think science has a lot of catching up to do. My opinion of course.
So you trust a 2000 year old book over science
Page 9 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News