- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Study: All Humanity Comes From One Couple.................... You don't say
Posted on 11/29/18 at 2:26 pm to dakarx
Posted on 11/29/18 at 2:26 pm to dakarx
Can you prove he did not?
Proving Non-Existence
Description: Demanding that one proves the non-existence of something in place of providing adequate evidence for the existence of that something.
Although it may be possible to prove non-existence in special situations, such as showing that a container does not contain certain items, one cannot prove universal or absolute non-existence. The proof of existence must come from those who make the claims.
[/quote]
logicallyfallacious.com
Proving Non-Existence
Description: Demanding that one proves the non-existence of something in place of providing adequate evidence for the existence of that something.
Although it may be possible to prove non-existence in special situations, such as showing that a container does not contain certain items, one cannot prove universal or absolute non-existence. The proof of existence must come from those who make the claims.
[/quote]
logicallyfallacious.com
This post was edited on 11/29/18 at 2:29 pm
0
Posted on 11/29/18 at 2:41 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Because you're making a claim.
You made the claim. I explained how that claim was flawed. I made no claim except to say you are guessing.
quote:
YECs are so clueless
Where did I say I was YEC? Now who is clueless?
Posted on 11/29/18 at 2:46 pm to blackrose890
quote:
There would actually be ocean front (sea front) property in Arizona.
Just like in that Tool song.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 2:51 pm to blackrose890
quote:
One, that would not be a global flood
umm, yes, that most certainly would be a global flood. Especially if you consider that the Earth's population would have been centralized as per the Biblical account. And also the scientific theory that the Earth was covered by a crust, and the water breaking free from below resulted in the never before seen elevations.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 2:53 pm to League Champs
Please provide your source?
Posted on 11/29/18 at 3:05 pm to Azkiger
quote:
and having a life expectancy of 30 years or so
What utter and complete nonsense.
At no time in global history has the lifespan been less than about 65 years. You should stop posting on this topic. Your 'beliefs' are based on biased suppositions, and not actual data. The term life expectancy already factors in the infant mortality rate, but people that survive to age 5 have historically lived long lives.
quote:
That’s life expectancy at birth, a figure dramatically influenced by infant mortality—pegged at the time as high as 30 percent. It does not mean that the average person living in 1200 A.D. died at the age of 35. Rather, for every child that died in infancy, another person might have lived to see their 70th birthday.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 3:23 pm to League Champs
quote:
At no time in global history has the lifespan been less than about 65 years.
I only read the last post in this thread, and based on this statement alone, you should likely not be taken seriously on much of what you have said. This is an utterly ridiculous claim to which the scientific data directly disagrees with you.
This post was edited on 11/29/18 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 11/29/18 at 3:34 pm to League Champs
quote:
What utter and complete nonsense.
At no time in global history has the lifespan been less than about 65 years. You should stop posting on this topic. Your 'beliefs' are based on biased suppositions, and not actual data. The term life expectancy already factors in the infant mortality rate, but people that survive to age 5 have historically lived long lives.
Your point has been previously addressed, and subsequently handled.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 3:42 pm to Jjdoc
It's talking about after a near extinction event.
You're more likely to prove Atlantis, Kill and Conan then Adam and Eve with this study
You're more likely to prove Atlantis, Kill and Conan then Adam and Eve with this study
Posted on 11/29/18 at 3:44 pm to rickyh
quote:Oh this again. Do you really not understand this?
Do you know how long 2.5 million years is and ridiculous it is to believe human population stayed stagnant that long.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 4:20 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
You made the claim.
No, I gave reasons why you cannot look at growth rates today and paste those growth rates all the way back to humanities beginning.
quote:
I made no claim except to say you are guessing.
So you didnt make claims about population growth rates?
quote:
Where did I say I was YEC? Now who is clueless?
Oh, well if you dont label yourself something theres no way you are that something. You got me there.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 4:25 pm to Azkiger
quote:
So you didnt make claims about population growth rates?
No. I pointed out some stats in the conversation.
quote:
Oh, well if you dont label yourself something theres no way you are that something. You got me there.
Indeed.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 4:29 pm to League Champs
quote:
At no time in global history has the lifespan been less than about 65 years.
You mean besides 1200 AD where you just quoted the average lifespan was 35? Also many regions of Africa have average lifespans less than 65 today. So...
quote:
Rather, for every child that died in infancy, another person might have lived to see their 70th birthday.
And I wish I could erase any game LSU scored 7 points or less from the record books.
Understand what we're talking about. Population growth rates. You cant just lob off infant mortality rates from these figures for the purposes of this conversation. Those figures have a lot to do with population growth.
This post was edited on 11/29/18 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 11/29/18 at 4:36 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
No. I pointed out some stats in the conversation.
You dont have stats to back up your claim, though.
quote:
Indeed.
Oh really? I dont label myself a sinner then. Am I a sinner?
Posted on 11/29/18 at 5:50 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Oh, well if you dont label yourself something theres no way you are that something. You got me there.
Like I told you, he uses all of their arguments but claims to not believe in their version of creation. I'm still waiting for the post of his positions that he will never post. If he had an argument he would be unable to defend it, so he chooses to deny all arguments against him and never states his case.
Page 24 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News