Started By
Message

States sue to stop Trump rule that would make it harder for some immigrants to get green

Posted on 9/14/26 at 12:41 pm
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43920 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 12:41 pm
cards and visas

quote:

New York and 21 other states are suing the Trump administration to block a new Department of Homeland Security rule that would give immigration officials wider discretion to deny green cards, visas or entry into the United States when determining whether applicants could become dependent on government aid. The rule change, set to take effect Friday, likely would make it tougher for many immigrants to obtain green cards if they use or are deemed likely to need public benefits such as food stamps, Medicaid or housing vouchers. New York State Attorney General Letitia James and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who is leading a coalition of cities filing a similar lawsuit, are expected to announce the legal action during a press conference at City Hall on Monday, James’ office said.


https://lite.cnn.com/2026/09/14/us/immigration-public-charge-green-card-lawsuits
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26597 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

when determining whether applicants could become dependent on government aid


Congress needs to pass something that limits federal aid (or reimbursement to the states) to only US citizens. If you're on a visa and need government assistance, go get it from your home country.

If blue states want to give welfare to them, fine. But its not eligible for any federal reimbursement, so they can tax their own state's residents to pay for it.
Posted by Friscodog
Ruston, LA. (Formerly Frisco TX)
Member since Jul 2009
5256 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

States sue to stop Trump rule that would make it harder for some immigrants to get green


No standing
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
30942 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 1:16 pm to
The democrats need their slave labor and voting blocks
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
6111 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

No standing

They have activist judges frothing at the mouth, pushing to to rule against this.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
46260 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

States sue to stop Trump rule that would make it harder for some immigrants to get green No standing


An Obama or Biden judge will side with them.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84113 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 1:40 pm to
Obama won against Arizona.


Immigration is the exclusive province of fedgov.
Posted by Tigersforthee
Member since Dec 2025
321 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 2:42 pm to
So when administration A decides to give visas out like candy to literally anyone none of us have any recourse, but when administration B decides to actually vet people before handing over a visa suddenly there are lawsuits everywhere?
Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4442 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

If blue states want to give welfare to them, fine. But its not eligible for any federal reimbursement, so they can tax their own state's residents to pay for it


Interesting take. Who do you think is funding the federal government?

Guess we arent aware of federal deficits lmao.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
23203 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 2:47 pm to
Why do we NEED immigrants?
Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4442 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 2:48 pm to
Literally dumb. Immigration is a resource. Every economics study shows that it is only a net positive. Hell Adam Smith even argued for open labor migration because receieving the labor means you won capitalism. The primary issue with immigration isnt the amount but how hard it is to go through the legal channels.

Reasonable immigration reform is committing to changes to make access to legal immigration easy. But, Trump is a fricking idiot who has never read an economics journal in his life so this is what we get.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26597 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 3:06 pm to
If California wants to give welfare to green card holders and raise the state taxes on their own residents to do it, let them. Just as long as the federal government isn’t reimbursing Cali for those expenses. Let all the H1B workers move to the west coast socialist utopia while the Cali tax burden drives productive people to red states.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
39119 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 3:31 pm to
now why would they do that? certainly there is no motive here right?
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
21229 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Literally dumb. Immigration is a resource. Every economics study shows that it is only a net positive. Hell Adam Smith even argued for open labor migration because receieving the labor means you won capitalism. The primary issue with immigration isnt the amount but how hard it is to go through the legal channels.

Reasonable immigration reform is committing to changes to make access to legal immigration easy. But, Trump is a fricking idiot who has never read an economics journal in his life so this is what we get.


How on earth is an "immigrant" a positive when they are on social programs upon entering the country? What an idiotic post.
Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4442 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

How on earth is an "immigrant" a positive when they are on social programs upon entering the country? What an idiotic post.



quote:

Every economics study shows that it is only a net positive. Hell Adam Smith even argued for open labor migration because receieving the labor means you won capitalism



I literally already answered your question in the post that you were replying to. Not being able to comprehend that is what is idiotic here lol.

Labor is a resource, which is why every study you will find, every paper published in a peer reviewed economic journal all say the same thing: Immigration is a net positive no matter the scale.

Go ahead and try to find one that says different.

Also go ahead and look up who Adam Smith is since you are unfamiliar with the study of economics
Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4442 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Just as long as the federal government isn’t reimbursing Cali for those expenses


Yeah, so I guess I was correct in assuming you dont understand federal deficit states.

In the hypothetical event of California recieving some sort of federal reimbursement for expanded safety net access to people immigrated here , it would be California and other blue states paying for that reimbursement. Florida and Texas are the only red state contributors to our federal government, the rest are all takers. Conserative policies create and reinforce poverty, so until we see some mass enlightenment swing conservatives towards economic literacy (and away from Trump's lack of economic literacy), you dont have to worry about red states paying for any federal reimbursements.

I get what you are saying in a vacuum, but in practice it wouldnt really be any different either way.
Posted by Jauquismos
Member since Jul 2023
1872 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

are deemed likely to need public benefits such as food stamps, Medicaid or housing vouchers.


Cut the spigot off
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
12009 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

Florida and Texas are the only red state contributors to our federal government, the rest are all takers. Conserative policies create and reinforce poverty


Lmao. Why are red states takers? What demographic is prevalent in southern red states? Which party passed welfare for this demographic of takers?

You are stupid.
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
29079 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:27 am to
Real immigrants are illegal ones?
Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4442 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 3:07 am to
quote:

What demographic is prevalent in southern red states? Which party passed welfare for this demographic of takers?


Poor people are the demographic prevalent in southern red states and the welfare that demographic receives comes largely from federal funds that blue states supply.

The idea that democratic leadership in red states that doesnt exist is responsible for welfare in red states and *that* is what is dragging them down is simply absurd. State supplied welfare in red states is limited and by no means is what drives poverty in red states. Its honestly laughable.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram