
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spencer Pratt on Talarico - Campaign is Over - Confirmed Looney Bin Visit
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:55 pm to ljhog
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:55 pm to ljhog
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. I don’t think the MAGA grifters are currently helping Paxton.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:56 pm to Dawgsontop34
Well it's not quite that simple
but yes you're correct: T'ico's campaign is tapping into a reactionary Democrat base
he has been on my radar for at least four years now; he's a crafted, calculated political laboratory creature
thats why he dangerous and I knew paxton would lose to him
He didn't even go to seminary until already been a state Rep for a couple of sessions , that was done to soften the ideological extremist edges
but yes you're correct: T'ico's campaign is tapping into a reactionary Democrat base
he has been on my radar for at least four years now; he's a crafted, calculated political laboratory creature
thats why he dangerous and I knew paxton would lose to him
He didn't even go to seminary until already been a state Rep for a couple of sessions , that was done to soften the ideological extremist edges
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:56 pm to Dawgsontop34
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:57 pm to Bunk Moreland
The dunk would be to win bunk
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Cornyn
Kay Bailey Cornyn who lost by 30 to Paxton?
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:03 pm to StrangeBrew
In a primary runoff, 7% of the voters participating voted
40% less than in the March primary
do you not understand that when only the hardcore voters are voting in a race, they may not choose the candidate who has the best chance of winning in the general
Is that concept just too difficult for you to grasp ?
40% less than in the March primary
do you not understand that when only the hardcore voters are voting in a race, they may not choose the candidate who has the best chance of winning in the general
Is that concept just too difficult for you to grasp ?
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:07 pm to OU81TOO
quote:
So you would just vote for the continuation of the methods that you obviously disagree with? Make up your mind you fricking hypocrite. This is how I know your account is a farce and you're just here to run interference.
wut
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:12 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
In a primary runoff, 7% of the voters participating voted
40% less than in the March primary
do you not understand that when only the hardcore voters are voting in a race, they may not choose the candidate who has the best chance of winning in the general
Is that concept just too difficult for you to grasp ?
DEMs have literally funded MAGA candidates in primaries so they'd win in the general
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
DEMs from Bayou Droppings are behind angel, bbonds deboard and boared
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:15 pm to OWLFAN86
It is not lost on me that one candidates voters were more motivated to show up. Cornyn has been hamstringing Trump from the get go.
In 2020 he totally abandoned him after Trump helped him across the finish line for his 4th term.
If the voters of Texas choose the freaks, so be it.
I would rather a wolf than a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
In 2020 he totally abandoned him after Trump helped him across the finish line for his 4th term.
If the voters of Texas choose the freaks, so be it.
I would rather a wolf than a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:19 pm to StrangeBrew
Well if that's the case citing primary runoff results is irrelevant to the discussion
and I'm not sure who the wolf or the wolf in sheep's clothing is in your scenario; whether paxton is either a wolf or a wolf in sheep's clothing
paxton would be the sheep thief
and I'm not sure who the wolf or the wolf in sheep's clothing is in your scenario; whether paxton is either a wolf or a wolf in sheep's clothing
paxton would be the sheep thief
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
wut
So you now support big government and the establishment? That's what electing Cornyn would continue. You really can't see the hypocrisy in your statement? I thought you were a small government libertarian....
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:22 pm to OWLFAN86
DeBoer has derailed the conversation
Remember, this was the post that he had that started this digression
And then this response to my comment
Remember, this was the post that he had that started this digression
quote:
When have you been positive or positive of Paxton? Yall claim to be red? Don’t see it
And then this response to my comment
quote:
Yet he outspent Paxton 10-1 and lost
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:24 pm to OWLFAN86
Angel and DeBoar I think.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:24 pm to OU81TOO
quote:
So you now support big government and the establishment?
Again, what?
Where did I say that?
You seem confused about the conversation going on and the words being used, and you want to have some weird irrelevant other conversation.
quote:
That's what electing Cornyn would continue.
This has nothing to do with the conversation and how DeBoer's standards on determining who is Republican are silly, nor does it have anything to do with the analysis that Cornyn would beat Talafreako easily.
quote:
You really can't see the hypocrisy in your statement?
You don't understand my statement and seem to be making some weird strawman into that hypocrisy you so want to derail the conversation into
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:26 pm to OWLFAN86
The wolf would be Talarico, the wolf in sheep’s clothing would be Cornyn.
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:29 pm to StrangeBrew
quote:ok
The world of would be Talarico, the wolf and the wolf sheep’s clothing would be Cornyn.
By the way I appreciate the dialog with you it's better than my back-and-forth with the sheep frickers like De borah in this thread
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:30 pm to Dawgsontop34
I certainly would believe what this person says/
That's sarcasm ok
That's sarcasm ok
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:31 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
By the way I appreciate the dialog with you it's better than my back-and-forth with the sheep frickers like De borah in this thread
So do I!

Popular
Back to top


2








