- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:37 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
His story is it never happened. So what is he supposed to say?
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:38 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
That said, Garland changed everything. Dont expect another reasonable appointment in an election year ever again.
That is fricking horse shite.
The God damned democrats said they would do the EXACT SAME THING in 2007 if GWB had the opportunity to appoint one.
God damn mother frickers expect the Republicans just to roll over AFTER they said EXACTLY WHAT THEY WOULD DO.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:39 pm to Tigerdev
Bork
Thomas
Now Kav
This has been a dem thing for decades.
Thomas
Now Kav
This has been a dem thing for decades.
This post was edited on 9/20/18 at 11:54 pm
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:41 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
Acting like a DC insider is the subject of a pre-civil rights lynching is what makes you folks lose your credibility.
This is purely your imagination.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:42 pm to gthog61
quote:
That is fricking horse shite.
Yeah. Before Garland, the Democrats treated every Republican appointee with decorum and grace.
Dev is a shill.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:46 pm to roadGator
quote:Did you support that? Garland?
Bork
Thomas
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:46 pm to the808bass
quote:
Dev is a shill.
To say the least
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:48 pm to Tigerdev
Support Bork and Thomas???? I was too young to care for Bork and to naive to pay attention for Thomas at the time.
I think Garland should have been run through the mud and had a vote. I'm not as considerate as the Rs though. I want the escalation.
Score: dems 3 repubs 1
We need to mount a comeback.
Seriously though, look at the voting records. It's not close as to which side is unhinged.
I think Garland should have been run through the mud and had a vote. I'm not as considerate as the Rs though. I want the escalation.
Score: dems 3 repubs 1
We need to mount a comeback.
Seriously though, look at the voting records. It's not close as to which side is unhinged.
This post was edited on 9/20/18 at 11:51 pm
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:50 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
It means that politics trump qualifications for the court. You are being dishonest if you dont think that established a nasty precedent.
Not this level of precedent, not even close. Ruining Kav’s reputation and potential livelihood is not right, even by political standards. It’s petty and does nothing to better our country or government.
quote:
Partisan politics is constant escalation. You cant be fine with it when it goes your way and cry foul when the other side does it
This is reasonable but doesn’t apply here, crying foul is a little different when it IS foul and the perpetrators admit as much.
quote:
As to the allegations, they are calling for a Federal investigation...not a trial by public opinion. Pushing it through and finding more info later doesnt seem wise. Its a political move...
How do you investigate - federally or anything - when there’s no when, where, or who? How about the 6 inquiries into his past that have already taken place?
You’re doing anything and everything to stay blind to the injustice being done to Kav and the American people as a whole, for purely political reasons as you admit.
quote:
but the conservatives are in a tough bind
How? They’re on the verge of shutting it all down and voting. The DEMS are in a tough bind, with a “victim” that has no credibility and no evidence. The American populace sees it all.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:51 pm to roadGator
quote:Umm the Rs didn't give a hearing so you are about the same?
I'm not as considerate as the Rs though.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:51 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
Garland
Did Obama ever even mention his name again ONCE after the day he put him up for "nomination"?
If he did, I don't remember.
Seems weird if this was such a huge deal and horrible thing by the Republicans.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:51 pm to Tigerdev
Trump will be appointing several more before his two terms are up. Buckle up buckaroo
Posted on 9/20/18 at 11:52 pm to Tigerdev
No. I'm less considerate I would have held the hearing and run him through like Spartacus and the rest of the resistance fighters. Then voted no.
This post was edited on 9/21/18 at 12:00 am
Posted on 9/21/18 at 12:12 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Ford wants Kavanaugh to testify first, her second
She can get bent.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 12:14 am to Tigerdev
quote:
I hate it but Trump has the right to appoint qualified SCOTUS. That said, Garland changed everything. Dont expect another reasonable appointment in an election year ever again.
Sure you can choose to believe this in your own little feaux reality but it doesn't change
The ACTUAL facts Biden started this precedent in the early 90's. Just because you keep saying it doesn't make it true. Garland was reaction to Biden.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 12:15 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
"Senator, I wouldn't touch that thot with your dick."
Posted on 9/21/18 at 12:19 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
“a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty.”
Posted on 9/21/18 at 12:26 am to Tigerdev
quote:
You think i had due process when i got my ts?
lol
Posted on 9/21/18 at 12:39 am to bigbowe80
Biden proposes the no vote in an election year rule.
Reid eliminates the 60 seats needed to confirm rule.
Trump stacks the USSC with conservatives for a generation
Reid eliminates the 60 seats needed to confirm rule.
Trump stacks the USSC with conservatives for a generation
This post was edited on 9/21/18 at 12:40 am
Page 5 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News