Started By
Message

re: So why were the two airliners after the first plane on 9/11

Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:16 am to
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
32931 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:16 am to
quote:

but would it have been better if shooting them down meant crashing into the Woolworth, or the Flatiron?


Heck, even UA175 came close to missing the South Tower entirely and almost broke apart.
Posted by stonedbegonias
Member since Jan 2010
12244 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:20 am to
Go back to bed
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
39673 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:21 am to
quote:

and you need presidential level authorization to shoot down civilian airliners.

Chaney actually made that call on Flight 93 but was later approved when they were able to get up with Bush. But, as we all recall, that was "Let's Roll" from the passengers as they stormed the cockpit and flew the plane into the ground. No telling how many lives were saved by those brave souls. I think the airliner did have some F16s near but weren't used.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
18236 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:23 am to
Shot down by what?

There was mass confusion and not even the realization that it was an attack till the 2nd airliner hit.

There were no jets with weapons to shoot anything down anywhere near the area. And the only jets available to even fly was sent out to the Atlantic because there was no clue where the next may come from.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
39612 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Not shotdown? Just heard the conversation between the air traffic controllers on 9/11 and the hijackers. The air traffic controllers realized the plane was being hijacked then contacted the military to scramble F-16's. It may have not been enough time to save the first plane hitting the tower but clearly they could have shot down the next two. Honestly this was the first time I have heard this conversation in 25 years.


Because magically and 100% coincidentally and in no way completely planned, they were busy running training exercises at NORAD at the exact same time.

Some of which included...hijacked air liners.

As a result, when the real reports came in, they didn't think they were real, so they stood down for a short period of time before finally canceling the training drills and reacting.


Posted by LaMigra
Member since Nov 2022
2802 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:40 am to
quote:

What happened to the plane that was supposed to hit tower 7


Que?
No plane hit tower 7 first time I hear that claim.
Posted by runforrestrun
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
1042 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:45 am to
9/11 has to be exhausting for you conspiracy freaks. Seek help.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19829 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 9:59 am to
Several reasons:

1) The hijackers turned off their transponders. While it might seem this makes it easier to track (the only plane without a transponder), it was the opposite because of how a secondary radar works. A secondary radar is what gives you transponder info and its what FAA looks at almost all the time. Once a pilot turns off a transponder, that plane disappears completely from the secondary radar (it doesn't show up at all). A primary radar can track everything, but it gives you no identifying info for ANY of the planes on the scope. You have to correlate things manually which is difficult.

2) Back then NORAD didn't even have radar pointed inside the U.S. Their mindset was still stuck in the Cold War with Goose and Maverick out chasing Russian MIGs around. NORAD's radar systems were all pointed at the oceans and had no way to track these domestic planes (on their own) even if they wanted to. NORAD did have the ability to "pull up" FAA's radar on their own scopes, but it was still FAA radar, not NORAD.

3) When FAA got in contact with NORAD, the only way to do so was by a phone call and voice chat. You had zero way to share info in real time other than by talking and manually giving out coordinates. While NORAD, as I said, did have the ability to pull up FAA radar on their own monitors, they were faced with the same challenge of identifying anonymous blips.

4) As I mentioned in point 1, FAA was forced to switch to primary radar which shows all planes, but only as blips. (None of the thousands of planes have transponder info on primary radar). What's worse is the "preferred radar" for that area did not offer any primary radar returns at all. When they switched to a backup radar, there was some glitch and the returns were 8 minutes behind real time. Here is the actual quote from the 911 Commission Report:

quote:

Radar reconstructions performed after 9/11 reveal that FAA radar equipment tracked the flight from the moment its transponder was turned off at 8:56. But for 8 minutes and 13 seconds, between 8:56 and 9:05, this primary radar information on American 77 was not displayed to controllers at Indianapolis Center. The reasons are technical, arising from the way the software processed radar information, as well as from poor primary radar coverage where American 77 was flying.

Primary radar contact for Flight 77 was lost because the ‘preferred’ radar in this geographic area had no primary radar system, the ‘supplemental’ radar had poor primary coverage, and the FAA ATC software did not allow the display of primary radar data from the ‘tertiary’ and ‘quadrary’ radars.


So it's worse than I thought. The ATC software had supplemental radar returns behind by 8 minutes and did not allow the traffic controllers to receive other backup (tertiary and quaternary) radar returns at all. The 8 minutes behind thing was a bug, but there's no explanation why tertiary and quaternary radar returns could not be seen at all.

5) NORAD was running simulation exercises that morning, with one of the war games being hijacked planes. You could tell that the NORAD people didn't think it was real and was some sort of exercise. I think even after FAA told them "This is real world, not exercise" they still didn't believe it and thought it was some trick (at least not until they turned on the news and saw it). And then you had FAA having to work their way up the NORAD chain of command (over the phone). One of the FAA guys finally got pissed, went Karen, and basically said "let me speak to the manager." (He actually said "Get me someone who can scramble fighter jets.").

6) NORAD actually did scramble jets fairly quickly after FAA demanded it. The first jets received a scramble order at 8:46 (two minutes before the first plane hit the tower) and were in the air by 9:53 (exactly 5 minutes which is a fairly good time). The issue was that since the hijackers turned off transponders, the F-15's out of Otis did not know where to go, so just ended up going out over the ocean in a holding pattern.

Then there were two F-16's scrambled out of Langley put in task of chasing the Pentagon plane. The odd thing is the F-16 pilots were not told it was a plane hijacking and believed they were looking for enemy fighters or missiles. When one of the pilots got over the Pentagon and saw it burning, he thought it was a foreign military fighter (or missile) that had hit the Pentagon.

TL;DR - Pure chaos. No one knew what to do. No clear chain of command between FAA and NORAD. Way too much playing "phone tag" with each other. No terrorism command center existed. All the hijacking protocols were focused on rational actors who would hijack, land, demand ransom, etc.
Posted by KCSilverTiger
KCMO
Member since Sep 2022
1163 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 10:07 am to
quote:

with 100% certainty that you're shooting down the right passenger jets out of hundreds


Not only that, but you have what? Maybe a couple of minutes to make that call?
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
60462 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

No plane hit tower 7 first time I hear that claim.

Interesting that it fell then
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
9260 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 12:15 pm to
What planes? There were many, many planes flying around. Which two? They wouldn’t know.
Posted by fwtex
Member since Nov 2019
3507 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 12:22 pm to
The military planes were not armed flying over the US. There was not time to have missiles loaded and get planes into the air so they told the planes in the air to use their planes as missiles if required.
This post was edited on 9/11/26 at 12:23 pm
Posted by gumbeaux
Member since Jun 2004
5532 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 12:28 pm to
quote:


Do you understand how many planes fly on any given day? Do you know how many planes were in the air that day? Singling out the other two planes that quickly and scrambling jets to stop them that quickly over a heavily populated NYC is an impossible task.


And the risk of shooting down the wrong plane with passengers on board.
Posted by Bama Bird
Pittsburgh, PA
Member since Mar 2013
22986 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 12:32 pm to
It all happened way more quickly than most remember.

Airspace was closed at 9:42. Sky wasn't even clear until 12:16 because it takes at least 30 minutes to land a single plane... when every plane is trying to land at once, 12:16 is probably record time honestly. It was absolutely chaotic and radio silence wasn't enough to start shooting planes down all over the place.

Korean Air 85 was almost shot down by the Canadians later in the day, but they were able to reestablish contact
Posted by TrueBaldPate
BR
Member since Dec 2019
987 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 12:39 pm to
I believe we scrambled two f-16s with 130 practice rounds and no other weapons. They planed to ram the cockpit and tail. Takes an hour to arm with missles.
The passengers took that one out 40 min before they got airborne. It all was so fast when no rules of engagement were set.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram