- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 3/26/25 at 2:38 pm to OchoDedos
Fully agree, but records laws exist for a reason... why else do you think Hillary's email server was such a big deal? But I doubt you had a need to know about that stuff either huh?
fricking hypocrites on this site my god
fricking hypocrites on this site my god
Posted on 3/26/25 at 2:43 pm to Kraut Dawg
quote:
On their face, no, Hegseth's comments are not "classified." But they are pieces to a puzzle.
A puzzle with missing pieces isn't an accurate representation of the picture. There are plenty of missing pieces in Hegseths posts, never once jeopardizing mission outcome to prying eyes. This story is complete bs.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 2:45 pm to HeadCall
quote:
most of our cabinet is pretty professional and like they actually give a shite about doing the right thing
I agree that they handled it pretty darn well. The conversation is very professional outside of a couple emojis but who really cares about that. The only issues I have with it is Goldberg being invited in and no one seemingly noticing it or not caring that he was there. It's carelessness at best from people that should absolutely know better and it makes you wonder where else this has happened and who has seen what when they shouldn't have. Secondly, I don't like that the messages are going to be deleted in 4 weeks. I'm not sure that is legal and even if it is... I still don't like it because we need records of what is happening for transparency sake.
ETA: Not a fan of sharing that the strikes were about to happen. That goes back to the carelessness I mentioned. Let them happen and then comment. Loose lips used to sink ships and whether we like it or not and whether it was intentional or an accident that Goldberg was added in there was a pair of eyes that reviewing it. That could've been someone truly adversarial and the mission could've been compromised. That would've been truly disastrous with far reaching consequences.
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 3/26/25 at 2:48 pm to Kraut Dawg
quote:
What I saw everyone else posted wasn't this critical info. But Hegseth? He screwed up, bigly.
Nah
Posted on 3/26/25 at 2:49 pm to Figgy
quote:
where else this has happened
They actually referenced other similar groups in the text chain so it has been happening... lord knows what they've been sharing confidential or not that we'll never see....
Using signal isn't illegal at all... using it to share details of a military strike however....
quote:
carelessness at best
Most likely answer... doesn't build confidence
Posted on 3/26/25 at 2:58 pm to HeadCall
Because the left says so.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:00 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
Its a symptom of sloppiness and a lack of professionalism
Like you pick your team on just loyalty and not if they can do the job.
Hegseth is a meathead we were warned
Like you pick your team on just loyalty and not if they can do the job.
Hegseth is a meathead we were warned
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:00 pm to Figgy
quote:
The only issues I have with it is Goldberg being invited in and no one seemingly noticing it or not caring that he was there. It's carelessness at best from people that should absolutely know better and it makes you wonder where else this has happened and who has seen what when they shouldn't have.
That right there.
But the Magatards will never admit to it.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:01 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
The important question is how the reporters number was listed under someone elses name.
This guy was known for sending his contact to politicians with his phone number, but someone else’s name. He would use names of people that that person often communicated with.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:01 pm to HeadCall
N
O
T
H
I
N
G
O
T
H
I
N
G
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:05 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
Its a symptom of sloppiness and a lack of professionalism
It’s not sloppy to have someone perhaps even maliciously add someone to a text string.
The reporter wasn’t on it from the jump.
quote:
Like you pick your team on just loyalty and not if they can do the job.
That’s rich coming from the party who sat by and watched a mentally deficient person in the office of the president for four years and then ran him former-election right up to the moment it couldn’t be hidden any longer. The good news there are fewer and fewer people buying your bullshite.
quote:
Hegseth is a meathead we were warned
Nah. We were warned he was a womanizing alcoholic. No one said anything about him being a meathead.
Of course, none of that is true but you do you.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:05 pm to HeadCall
Its just a straw they are grasping at. Absolutely nothing is going their way and they have to REEEEEEEE about something.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:06 pm to tketaco
quote:
Signal and Session are the only ones that the government doesnt have a back door to.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:08 pm to alphaandomega
I’ve had CNN on most of the afternoon. It’s wall to wall coverage of the Signal scandal.
“Hegseth, Vance and other high ranking administration officials leak ‘potentially’ classified information”
Yet not once have the actually shown the messages or even reported what the messages said. That tells me that they don’t want their audience to see what was said because then no one will care.
“Hegseth, Vance and other high ranking administration officials leak ‘potentially’ classified information”
Yet not once have the actually shown the messages or even reported what the messages said. That tells me that they don’t want their audience to see what was said because then no one will care.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:08 pm to HeadCall
Nothing if people would shut the frick up about them, they would fade away
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:11 pm to HeadCall
It's just like when CNN had Jake Tapper & Chris Cuomo tell you that you'd better not read the Wikileaks reveal of the Hillary/Podesta/DNC emails. They'd tell you what you needed to know about the matter.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:12 pm to OchoDedos
This post was edited on 4/12/25 at 1:24 am
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:13 pm to HeadCall
quote:
So what’s so damning about these Signal messages?
Nothing. The Dims know that all they have to do is act like something is amiss and their base will believe it an follow suit.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 3:14 pm to atlgamecockman
quote:
Well the messages auto-delete so they are intentionally avoiding FOIA and communication preservation by using it unless they upload the chats to a secure server for documentation purposes
No one gives a flying frick about this. Keep grasping for outrage though.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News