- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So the internet has mostly worked great all these years...
Posted on 12/15/17 at 8:27 am to GeauxxxTigers23
Posted on 12/15/17 at 8:27 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
quote:
Do you really think these corporations have us in our best interest?
Am I supposed to assume the government does?
0
Posted on 12/15/17 at 8:31 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
When Comcast is the one with the power to block certain sites I can absolutely see sjw's protesting them saying "why are you allowing Breitbart who advocates hate to exist on your network?" and they'll win. Domain registry's have already moved into blacklisting certain sites, now that the ISP's are able to you think they won't?
So SJWs want net neutrality to protect conservatives from SJWs?
Posted on 12/15/17 at 8:47 am to starsandstripes
quote:
Any pro-NN person will not be able to defend NN after reading the item above and reading the CIWA.
What is the CIWA? I cant find it
This post was edited on 12/15/17 at 8:48 am
Posted on 12/15/17 at 8:51 am to TigerGman
quote:
So the internet has mostly worked great all these years...
The founding father Al Gore did a fantastic job!
Posted on 12/15/17 at 8:58 am to SLafourche07
quote:
So SJWs want net neutrality to protect conservatives from SJWs?
I have no idea what sjw's want and honestly I don't think they know what they want themselves, but they'll use this as a means to an end though.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 9:01 am to ShortyRob
Net Neutrality is crap. Regional, government-enforced ISP monopolies is also crap.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 9:11 am to starsandstripes
I really didn't feel like reading all that shite. But I'm glad I did and everyone should, left or right leaning. The measures described could have just as easily been utilized by a GOP admin against prog "propaganda" as well.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 9:37 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Am I supposed to assume the government does?
Anything that's put back to the way it was before Obama, is fine by me.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 9:38 am to the LSUSaint
quote:
Anything that's put back to the way it was before Obama, is fine by me.
This is the worst way to look at issues. So if Obama had put in a plan that solved world hunger(at no cost to you) you would be against it because Obama put it in?
Posted on 12/15/17 at 9:45 am to Greace
quote:
This is the worst way to look at issues. So if Obama had put in a plan that solved world hunger(at no cost to you) you would be against it because Obama put it in?
Show me the plan. I gurantee you it's funded by putting tax payers further in debt and not taking a penny from the welfare recipients.
So yes,
Posted on 12/15/17 at 9:51 am to ShortyRob
quote:
We need to make fundamental changes to it why?
Just Republicans coddling the rich and powerful, their pay masters, all in the name of the almighty dollar. Telecoms were already violating the law and throttling services and trying to charge for things that were free. Expect that to explode now. Corporations aren't trustworthy and you can take them at their word. Telecoms are the worst companies on the face of the planet.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 9:53 am to the LSUSaint
You guarantee me that a fake plan I just made up is funded by tax payers and it doesn't take any money from welfare recipients?
Posted on 12/15/17 at 10:44 am to Greace
quote:
You guarantee me that a fake plan I just made up is funded by tax payers and it doesn't take any money from welfare recipients?
Yes, if Obama devised it, it will be part of wealth distribution model that makes America weaker.
You make up a stupid fake statement, and it gets answered by historically supported assumptions....and you're taken back by the answers? LOL
Stay on point and this wouldn't happen
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:51 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Domain registry's have already moved into blacklisting certain sites
This is part of my issue with the, now former, NN rules: registrars could black list anything they wanted, DNS providers (Google) and backbones (Amazon I believe) could STILL censor and throttle all they wanted under the rules. It doesn't sound even a little suspicious that these entities wanted handcuffs placed on the other power players in this space?
Forgive me if this isn't 100% accurate, I haven't been able to find anything but fear mongering propaganda from Google and Reddit re: NN for months despite pretty solid efforts.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News