- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So is "controlling women's bodies" the preferred term over "killing innocent babies"?
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:31 am
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:31 am
Just want to make sure I have my liberal lies straight.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 8:32 am
18
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:33 am to stout
Hell, now they are calling it “a mercy to the baby.”
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:35 am to stout
We absolutely need a requirement that national issues be described in the most efficient, scientific, natural, grammatically correct, words as possible.
When you are gabbing with your safe-space groups you can use any euphemism or lie you want.
BUT when a PUBLIC OFFICIAL make OFFICIAL STATEMENTs about a NATIONAL ISSUE that my lead to LEGISLATION - they should be REQUIRED on penalty of expulsion to use the most efficient and direct description of the issue possible.
ESPECIALLTY in the titles of bills to be debated in congress.
When you are gabbing with your safe-space groups you can use any euphemism or lie you want.
BUT when a PUBLIC OFFICIAL make OFFICIAL STATEMENTs about a NATIONAL ISSUE that my lead to LEGISLATION - they should be REQUIRED on penalty of expulsion to use the most efficient and direct description of the issue possible.
ESPECIALLTY in the titles of bills to be debated in congress.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:35 am to stout
You sound very concerned.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:46 am to stout
liberals/communists are masters of misleading words and phrases
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:49 am to stout
And are we to assume they have no control over getting pregnant?
Sounds like stone age thought to me.
Sounds like stone age thought to me.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:50 am to stout
quote:
So is "controlling women's bodies" the preferred term over "killing innocent babies"?
Exactly. Just like, for some odd reason, "Anti Choice or Anti Women" is the preferred term over "Pro Life". Can't have people being for life. They must be framed as being against something.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:51 am to stout
Same as getting an abortion is conflated as a woman’s health issue.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:52 am to stout
Well it is controlling women’s bodies whether you, me or whoever thinks abortion is right or not. How is that even a tiny bit deniable?
Posted on 5/29/19 at 8:56 am to stout
Yes, because nobody likes to talk about the true reason that feminists so staunchly support abortion.
It is because they HATE with every fiber of their being that evolution has left them at a reproductive disadvantage to men. Men essentially have been granted the "ability" to wine and dine them and then leave them with the check.
The response to this is an attempt to deny reality and declare that there is, in fact, no check - and ripping it apart.
But, as much as they scream and yell and pull their hair, they can't change reality.
The debt is still there.
It is because they HATE with every fiber of their being that evolution has left them at a reproductive disadvantage to men. Men essentially have been granted the "ability" to wine and dine them and then leave them with the check.
The response to this is an attempt to deny reality and declare that there is, in fact, no check - and ripping it apart.
But, as much as they scream and yell and pull their hair, they can't change reality.
The debt is still there.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 8:57 am
Posted on 5/29/19 at 9:12 am to stout
If you want an abortion after 1st trimester, support pro choice and say her choice, you should be forced to watch an abortion. Watch those cells be ripped apart on ultra sound, pulled out and placed on a tray.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 9:34 am to piggilicious
quote:a woman being pregnant does not give her the right to murder a baby for convenience, even if she had no choice in getting pregnant. i've addressed this in this thread
Well it is controlling women’s bodies
Posted on 5/29/19 at 9:35 am to stout
The good news is that 99% of aborted babies are Democrats of one stripe or another
Posted on 5/29/19 at 9:37 am to piggilicious
quote:
Well it is controlling women’s bodies
Back in the day when women didn’t have all these “rights” they were a lot happier and didn’t take all these depression pills
Really makes you think
Posted on 5/29/19 at 9:37 am to stout
quote:i got this response in my thread. that being pregnant is a "burden" to a woman and she should be allowed to murder the baby. of course no one has answered my response to that ridiculous idea
is "controlling women's bodies" the preferred term over "killing innocent babies"?
Posted on 5/29/19 at 9:38 am to IslandBuckeye
quote:so she can't be bothered to have the baby and give it up for adoption? what does that cost her?
And are we to assume they have no control over getting pregnant? Sounds like stone age thought to me.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 9:49 am to bfniii
quote:
a woman being pregnant does not give her the right to murder a baby for convenience, even if she had no choice in getting pregnant. i've addressed this in this thread
But you, as a man I assume, or even the govt has the right to determine what is right for a woman’s body which, again, as hopefully anyone can understand is the control of women’s bodies no matter how you slice it.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 9:52 am to piggilicious
quote:
But you, as a man I assume, or even the govt has the right to determine what is right for a woman’s body which, again, as hopefully anyone can understand is the control of women’s bodies no matter how you slice it.
By law, you are required to wear a seat belt. By law, you cannot simply shoot me in the head because you want to. Are those laws also "controlling women's bodies"?
Posted on 5/29/19 at 9:55 am to piggilicious
quote:Identity politics shouldn't determine morality. Murder should be illegal regardless of the sex of the murderer.
But you, as a man I assume, or even the govt has the right to determine what is right for a woman’s body which, again, as hopefully anyone can understand is the control of women’s bodies no matter how you slice it.
Likewise with abortion, if it's actually taking a human life, it should be condemned by everyone, both women and men. Body control comes second to killing another human being.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 9:58 am to piggilicious
I can keeeeel muh baby if’n I wont to. frick the patriarchy!!! No man gonna tell me what to do.
That’s your logic?
That’s your logic?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News