re: So every close election is “fraud” unless republicans win?

You can’t talk logic to a soy idiot that is a notre dame fan

quote:

---

NC_Tigah

---

Yes, that is the only article that my search found, too. One reporter used the word “conviction.” I think we are agreed that reporters are not bright people. He provided no reference to any substantive facts regarding this purported “conviction.”

The only thing I can find was a judicial finding in May 2018 that she destroyed some ballots that were the subject of a civil lawsuiit about a recount. (Newspaper article). Again, “shady,” but that is not a criminal conviction.

Again, what crime? When and where?

I predict continued victory dances about a reporter who misused the word “conviction,” and no link to ant ACTUAL conviction.

So only the Dems can question the legitimacy of elections?

Broward county is:
1 - Criminal
2 - Criminally stupid

quote:

---

Again, what crime?

---

Wrongdoing was the term used.
She was found by the courts to have overseen illegal destruction of of ballots. What term would you use?

quote:

---

Wrongdoing was the term used.

She was found by the courts to have overseen illegal destruction of of ballots. What term would you use?

---

AUStar specifically used the word “convicted.”

What term would I use? The same one that you and I have already used ... “judicial finding.”

I would certainly not say that someone had been convicted of a crime, when no charges have even been brought.

This is just another example of the tendency to demonize political opponents by lying or (at best) exagerating negatives, when the ACTUAL negatives are quite enough cause for concern

quote:

---

I would certainly not say that someone had been convicted of a crime

---

Nor did he.

Broward, dude, Broward...

Explain that, and put your sex toy strawman you're fricking back in the closet

quote:

---

Nor did he.

---

Are you serious, Clark?

quote:

---

AUStar

already convicted

---

Perhaps you have a unique dictionary, but mine says:

quote:

---

con·vict
verb
past tense: convicted; past participle: convicted
/k?n'vikt/Submit
declare (someone) to be guilty of a criminal offense by the verdict of a jury or the decision of a judge in a criminal trial or criminal proceeding, which ends in a judgment or sentence that the prisoner is guilty as charged. .

---

So, again, where is the “conviction.”. When?”

Again, a judicial finding in a civil proceeding is not a “conviction.”. Do you lack the intellectual honesty to make even that simple admission?

You Dems certainly learned your lesson in 2000. Not a single recount “let every vote count” operation has gone for the GOP since then.

Well done.

Richly stated after a two year investigation into Russian collusion.