re: SlowBrennanPro weighs in on Iran actions

quote:

---

I dont cheer wars. I am not stupid enough to fall for the israel peed in my wheaties and killed Charlie nonsense.

If you cant see the divisive op you are part of it as a useful idjet.

Tucker bowtie Carlson has spouted off a lot of untruth for 40 years. He was not detained. He wasnt arrested...and no one is spying on his dumbass anymore than you and I..

But I dont gets leaks from Joe Vindman Kent, nor do I communicate with Iran...

All of Tuckers bullshite should be monitored. So cry in your cereal some more.

---

What does any of this have to do with his actual post?

that pile of shite really needs to be in jail

quote:

---

I asked what happened to him and he spouted off the no forever wars Tucker was spied on tired crap.

---

This was the post to which you responded:

quote:

---

I haven't changed.

I've been consistent for years on my views regarding military misadventurism, regime change, freedom of speech, the CIA, the FBI, etc etc etc. I'm not the one cheering the launch of a war in the Middle East against an Islamist country of 90M people that controls almost 25% of the world's oil flow in an election year. And I'm not the one openly posting for the FBI to spy on and arrest people because they say bad things about the war or our foreign policy.

I'm standing here wondering where everyone went. Then I see a poster I knew as MAGA walk by, high fives me over Iran, and says come on man we're over at Liz Cheney and Lindsey Graham's places.

And I'm a bit astonished.

Especially because I see a freight train coming in November and people cheering on what I think are profoundly strategic mistakes.

---

Where did he reference Tucker?

Where did he reference Tucker was spied on?

quote:

---

Blame israel

---

Where did he reference Israel?

quote:

---

need a fricking ignore button

---

Aww cher bb, this not a safe enough space for you?

40K+, lol

Someone is lying. But an expensive gift we won't see tho

quote:

---

They weren’t on a payroll & there is zero evidence they were pursuing nuclear weapons at any point in time overlapping when the US remained part of the deal.

---

Iran was NOT allowing nuclear inspectors access to all potential facilities.

Was that not part of the original agreement?

quote:

---

SlowBrennanPro

---

That is funny as f#@!

Lol, he said "Hunter Bidens Laptop"

quote:

---

Iran was NOT allowing nuclear inspectors access to all potential facilities. Was that not part of the original agreement?

---

Just for the record I wouldn’t downvote you for asking a question. IAEA could inspect whatever they wanted, they just had to give notice for certain types of sites. It was pretty intrusive as it were. Had unlimited access to supply chains.

It wasn’t perfect, but it laid a foundation for diplomacy. We replaced it with sanctions. Things escalated from there.

If the regime survives you’ll have to make another deal like that one where the only thing that changed is we hate each other more and trust each other less lol.

quote:

---

IAEA could inspect whatever they wanted, they just had to give notice for certain types of sites.

---

That is simply not true.

quote:

---

The IAEA has the right to inspect nuclear facilities in Iran under its safeguards agreements, but access to certain sites, especially military ones, has been restricted by Iran. This limitation has hindered the IAEA's ability to verify the full scope of Iran's nuclear activities.

---