- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Since I Couldn't Get SFP To Answer My Questions, I'll Ask the PT Board.....
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:500k posts is nothing to sneeze at tbf
This isn't exactly a hotbed of DEM activity, if you didn't know.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:22 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
they were plenty of posts about Trump never sniffing the WH, or Joe being sharp as a tack o
You asked about the election loss and Kamala
quote:
can you link me to your threads mocking dims for cackles loss?
What does Joe Biden have to do with that?
quote:
yet I can't recall a single post of yours even disputing this ridiculous stupidity
You didn't pay attention, but here's a post from JUNE 2024
Kamala was an auto-loss and I said so from the literal get go.
quote:
You'd think in a half million posts you'd have one right Mr non partisan?

Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:23 pm to KCT
YES
YES
YES
& don’t plan on any of the communist supporters to respond because there is no logical answer that doesn’t implicate their own people they support.
YES
YES
& don’t plan on any of the communist supporters to respond because there is no logical answer that doesn’t implicate their own people they support.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What a total fraud you are.
Just take the L and stop flailing.
Check the upvote/downvote, fool. Despite your protestations to the contrary, people here aren't stupid. They can see that, once again, you've used deflective, nuanced, and inconseguential language to escape from truth and reality.
Seriously, what's "irrelevant" about a question regarding whether or not Obama used his minions to spy on/surveill James Rosen? You know damn well that Obama did just that, but you don't want to admit the obvious truth.
I don't know if you're married. If you are, I feel sorry for that woman. Narcissistic jerks like you are INSUFFERABLE.
And, obtw, I have made you look like the foolish fraud that you are on numerous occasions. For a so-called lawyer, you can't debate worth a damn.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:30 pm to KCT
quote:
Seriously, what's "irrelevant" about a question regarding whether or not Obama used his minions to spy on/surveill James Rosen?
A government LEO agency getting warrants has no direct relevance to governance or policy.
I told you we could talk policy all day long and that would be very relevant to the discussion of whether or not I ever supported Obama.
quote:
They can see that, once again, you've used deflective, nuanced, and inconseguential language to escape from truth and reality.
You are the one who used "spy", not me. I tried to let you walk back the dishonesty, and you just got mad
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:30 pm to Westbank111
quote:
don’t plan on any of the communist supporters to respond because there is no logical answer that doesn’t implicate their own people they support.
As proven over and over again by sfp.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:31 pm to KCT
quote:
As proven over and over again by sfp.
You mean like when I responded to less-framed wording?
Yes they were SURVEILED. That's an appropriate description.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You mean like when I responded to less-framed wording? ?
Yes they were SURVEILED. That's an appropriate description.
When you can't win an argument, resort to a euphemism so you can then run and hide.
You're lucky you're just a divorce lawyer. You don't even come close to possessing the skillset to actually argue a conventional case in court.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:44 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Someone ask SFP about the 14th amendment. IT'S A HOOT
Hell, I'd like to see him try to explain away the 10th Amendment and how 90% of what the federal government does isn't grossly unconstitutional.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 5:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:yeah you are really dunking on dim posters hard enough to get banned
You didn't pay attention, but here's a post from JUNE 2024
Stating the obvious that cackles was a shite candidate wasnt some revelation. Where are the dunks on the hapless dims? You got banished to the OT for your thread on Trumps kangaroo trial even though you admitted it was a partisan judge. An officer of the court laughing about that shite. Let's see you doing the same shite to the VORs or Tboys saying Trump will never sniff the WH again or the Russiagate/laptop clowns. 500k posts there's gotta be ONE calling them out surely. Let's see it
Posted on 11/3/25 at 5:11 pm to KCT
quote:
SFP
Didn’t she get outed as fricking homeless men?
Posted on 11/3/25 at 6:31 pm to KCT
quote:I try to not make fun of SFP because I know SFP can't help mental illness or autism or whatever it is SFP has. Having said that, there is nothing wrong with holding SFP accountable for showing up in a thread with some farcical assertion that can't be supported.
This response is a typical example of why myself and so many here have "SFP Fatigue."
SFP always runs
Posted on 11/3/25 at 6:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Nope. You're just SFP. Those were simple yes or no questions and they are super important
He has major framing issues with his questions
quote:You are the absolute worst at being dishonest, fraud
dishonest questions
Posted on 11/3/25 at 6:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:How many pages will SFP drag this out?
That's part of me not responding to dishonesty
Posted on 11/3/25 at 6:35 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Shut up loser. You and your stupid tariff takes.
This is just another MAGA masturbatory thread
Hey, why don't we just let China manufacture all of our important stuff and stick to a "service economy." Yeah, that's a great idea.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 6:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Oh so you're being pedantic?
That's rich
Tell us more about the 14th amendment
Posted on 11/3/25 at 6:39 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Ok halfwit
anyone still on the tariff train by now has to be illiterate
quote:When you want to have a grown up discussion, let us know. Until then, those shelves aren't going to stock themselves
you folks do not or cannot read them
Posted on 11/3/25 at 6:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:This has all gone exactly according to script. SFP makes some stupid, autistic assertion. When people start to ask for substantiation, SFP obfuscates for pages on end.
I specifically had the opposite position of it being "fine", but I just apply my position generally and not based on partisanship
Posted on 11/3/25 at 6:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Wrong
Which he answered long ago
Popular
Back to top


0




