Started By
Message

re: Should the "con" - servative influencer soda whores ever be trusted or followed again?

Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:33 am to
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
18361 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:33 am to
I think there are very few people in politics, or on social media, who aren't bought relatively easily. Newsflash: Most of them are in it for the money.
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
13582 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:36 am to
quote:

Ian Miles Chong


Malaysian SDVTiger
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
42679 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:43 am to
Is their a list of these $ellouts anywhere? If I ever watch any of them, I would stop if I knew who they were.

Jenna Ellis is hardly a surprise. She stabbed Trump in the back over the bogus Georgia case. Trish Regan is another one I would wonder about. She hops on the Trump Train when things are going well, and hops off anytime she catches a little heat.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
87852 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:44 am to
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
13582 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:46 am to
Keep it. They might not let you buy your hot pockets with food stamps anymore so you’ll need it. Well, your mother will.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
87852 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:48 am to
You need new material
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
13582 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:49 am to
Why waste new material on the biggest loser on this website? You are the joke.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
87852 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:50 am to
K
Posted by SallysHuman
With Sally
Member since Jan 2025
3363 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:50 am to
quote:

Is their a list of these $ellouts anywhere? If I ever watch any of them, I would stop if I knew who they were.


Go at it like this- assume they are ALL sellouts. Treat their posts as information, don't BE 'influenced'.
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
13582 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:52 am to
Truth hurts, huh?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
87852 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 7:52 am to
Im devastated

Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59512 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:01 am to
My complaint with soda purchases on SNAP is a financial one. Soda is expensive.

It has nothing to do with health.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
282540 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:02 am to
quote:


Go at it like this- assume they are ALL sellouts.


They are. Actors with a script
Posted by SallysHuman
With Sally
Member since Jan 2025
3363 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 8:03 am to
quote:

My complaint with soda purchases on SNAP is a financial one. Soda is expensive.


No joke. I like soda, but don't buy it often because of how expensive it is.

But that also explains why Soda Companies depend on their product being covered by SNAP... cuz the rest of us aren't buying $11 12pks.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
54942 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:15 am to
I opposed Bloomberg's bans because that was direct government action telling us what we can or cannot eat or drink.

That is a BIG difference from saying we, the taxpayers, should not fund cokes and sugar drinks for others. Just because you have a right to eat it does not mean you have a right to make me pay for it.

Something lost on these so called influencers.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
150264 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:50 am to
I agree. Government banning sodas altogether is way different than restricting them from food programs.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
69820 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 3:00 pm to
apples and oranges.
This post was edited on 3/30/25 at 3:01 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram