- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:54 pm to texridder
quote:
Prove it, asswipe.
You were believe all women with Kavanaugh. When someone called you out in the Tara Reade thread, you were nowhere to be found. That was (D)ifferent.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What does that have to do with bribes?
So... Nixon was immune ... Interesting take. You should be so proud. Sharp legal mind and all ..,
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
It’s extremely relevant. Anyone can accuse anyone of anything. Some legitimate threshold of Evidence and solid legal foundation matters.
Trying to box a politician in to an immunity defense using hocus pocus, to manufacture a legal precedent to bail your own guy out is Soviet level bullshite.
We don’t have to entertain this as something it isn’t just because you want to.
Trying to box a politician in to an immunity defense using hocus pocus, to manufacture a legal precedent to bail your own guy out is Soviet level bullshite.
We don’t have to entertain this as something it isn’t just because you want to.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:17 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Some legitimate threshold of Evidence and solid legal foundation matters.
That's already been met.
That's why the motion to dismiss is based on immunity instead.
quote:
We don’t have to entertain this as something it isn’t just because you want to.
It's literally a motion that is going before the Supreme Court in time.
It's being entertained by people much more important than us in the legal system, so I think we can discuss it.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That absolute immunity means absolute immunity? Absolutely
What if you are wrong and they do have it?
Doesn’t that potentially help Biden, in the event that Trump is elected?
On a final note, are you excluding the UCMJ?
I mean, as CiC, a president could have “absolute immunity” from civilian prosecution, but still be prosecuted via the UCMJ.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:21 pm to texridder
quote:
Prove it, asswipe.
Easy. You still believe in muh Russia.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
Presidents should not have immunity, Congress should not be allowed to inside trade, all political office should have term limits.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:23 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
What if you are wrong and they do have it?
Then we better pray for absolutely honorable men mobility forward.
quote:
you excluding the UCMJ?
I don't see how that would apply.
The President does not enlist in, and he is not inducted or drafted into, the armed forces. Nor, is he subject to court-martial or other military discipline.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
It being injected into a corrupt system and having to be addressed means very little in terms of the legitimacy of the charge. GTFO with this logic. They can do anything they want.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:30 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
means very little in terms of the legitimacy of the charge.
That has literally nothing to do with this discussion.
Stop trying to create a digression.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What about taking bribes after he's in office?
Yes. You satisfied now pussy?
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:38 pm to jorconalx
quote:
SFP is trying to play gotcha. It’s his thing. I wish people would ignore him and maybe he would disappear
Late to the party. Not sure if it's been explained to Super Slow Flow yet but ALL of the publicly exposed bribes and overwhelming evidence of his family's corruption happened before Hyden Biden was installed as POTUS.
What PDJT is claiming as Presidential Immunity is simply fascist, neo-communist Lawfare Bull Shite charges that would have occurred while he was the POTUS.
Is this a trick question phrasing it While in Office? It is possible considering Hunter was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for his shite paintings that any reasonable person knows was simply a payoff like book deals and Netflix Contracts?
If it can be proven he was in on the negotiations for the price of Hunter's so-called art, why would this be any different from a Nixon or Watergate situation?
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
Stop trying to police what’s discussed in the thread. If your arguments aren’t strong enough, get new arguments
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The President does not enlist in, and he is not inducted or drafted into, the armed forces. Nor, is he subject to court-martial or other military discipline.
Iirc, if the court system is suspended, for whatever reason, then non-military personnel can be tried via the UCMJ, but only for sedition and/or treason. Am I wrong on this?
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:42 pm to Speckhunter2012
Every American President since the end of WW2 would be hung if the Nuremberg laws were applied to them. The idea that Trump is some sort of deviation from decency is not only a lie, it may be the biggest one ever told by the American political establishment other than Oswald killed Kennedy.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:48 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
Every American President since the end of WW2 would be hung if the Nuremberg laws were applied to them.
Didn’t Obama knowingly drone a US citizen? I mean, he was supposedly aligned with terrorists, so that is something to consider (context). Yet, wouldn’t that still be considered murder under the legal system?
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:50 pm to jimmy the leg
I'm not an expert on the UCMJ but I don't think it's jurisdiction extends beyond those in the military.
The President is a civilian position and the Constitution makes it 100% clear this law cannot apply to him..
The President is a civilian position and the Constitution makes it 100% clear this law cannot apply to him..
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:54 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Didn’t Obama knowingly drone a US citizen?
Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki. He was a 16 year old boy. He also had a secret kill list that his administration fought against becoming public. He also prosecuted more whistle-blowers than every prior administration combined. Obama was simply a neocon disguised as a generational reformer.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 9:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Should Joe Biden be immune from prosecution for taking bribes while in office?
Step one: House impeaches.
Step two: senate convicts and removes.
Step three: DOJ prosecutes for any crimes the sentate finds the president guilty of under the criminal standard.
This post was edited on 1/6/24 at 9:55 pm
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News