re: Shortage of economically attractive partners for unmarried women to marry

LINK

quote:

---

Clark examines and compares surnames in such diverse cases as modern Sweden and Qing Dynasty China. He demonstrates how fate is determined by ancestry and that almost all societies have similarly low social mobility rates. Challenging popular assumptions about mobility and revealing the deeply entrenched force of inherited advantage, The Son Also Rises is sure to prompt intense debate for years to come.

---

Clark suggests that mobility doesn’t really exist. Not in the way we thought.

It takes several generations to see any actual mobility. And that has a lot to do with inherited genetic advantages, and the culture that is passed down to us as children.

He found that government intervention had no effect on rates of social mobility, mobility rates are the same in the US and Sweden.

India, with the caste system, had absolutely zero social mobility.

quote:

---

Women decided the reasons men used to be attracted to them and want them as partners were all bad...……..so, they've set about eliminating those reasons...…...leaving only the pussy remaining.

---

I have often said similar things. Men wanted women who had the skills to keep a home. They wanted a woman who could cook, clean, sew, etc. Women told women that these skills were outdated, so most women abandoned them. Men wanted a woman who was polite, kind, nurturing, and would make them feel relaxed and welcome when they came home from work. Women told women that men need to pull their weight, that women should be competitive and demanding. Men want to eventually become fathers. Women told other women to focus on their careers first and that being “just a a mother” made them somehow less-than.

So, women, by and large, have basically become nagging, insufferable children with no home-making skills, no common-interests, no interesting hobbies other than bad reality tv, no desire to raise children (they might want to have them, but don’t want to raise them personally) and cannot understand why men seem to only be interested in them for casual sex.

Women who make an effort to be interesting to men in ways other than sex attract men’s interests in sex AND other things.

Short version: feminists told women to not care about most of the things men want in relationships other than sex leading to men only being interested in women for sex because they have nothing else worthwhile to offer as human beings.

quote:

---

But, what I see is a society where women become more and more disposable in terms of partnerships and paradoxically, as they become more affluent themselves, they become essentially ONLY good for one thing to men...………...fricking.

---

see: hookup culture in college

this mindset/culture plus a severe sex ratio imbalance has made a generation of college women nothing more than frick toys

I believe it is because children are easier to coral, manipulate, and control. It’s the same reason manipulative people treat their SO’s like children. They want them to think like children so they can control them like a parent rather than a partner.

quote:

---

I have often said similar things. Men wanted women who had the skills to keep a home. They wanted a woman who could cook, clean, sew, etc. Women told women that these skills were outdated, so most women abandoned them. Men wanted a woman who was polite, kind, nurturing, and would make them feel relaxed and welcome when they came home from work. Women told women that men need to pull their weight, that women should be competitive and demanding. Men want to eventually become fathers. Women told other women to focus on their careers first and that being “just a a mother” made them somehow less-than. So, women, by and large, have basically become nagging, insufferable children with no home-making skills, no common-interests, no interesting hobbies other than bad reality tv, no desire to raise children (they might want to have them, but don’t want to raise them personally) and cannot understand why men seem to only be interested in them for casual sex. Women who make an effort to be interesting to men in ways other than sex attract men’s interests in sex AND other things.

---

Absolutely right. My wife is a ninja in the kitchen and with a sewing machine. 11th anniversary coming up, no affairs, no end in sight.

quote:

---

Men wanted a woman who was polite, kind, nurturing, and would make them feel relaxed and welcome Those qualities are still very attractive.

---

IDK, my wife is not polite, kind or nurturing.
She's attractive, fit, intelligent and sarcastic as hell. But I find those qualities more appealing than polite, kind and nurturing.

quote:

---

a lot of women had to settle for guys they didn’t really want that much

---

The men they married were matches for the better of the group and society and prioritized familial/community bonds. Now women could marry a dude they met on tinder a week ago.

The problem is are women prioritizing the right things when dating? Same goes for men.

What's happened is most men/women are growing up playing the "dating game" and then marriage is just an extended dating game to them. They're addicted to the vanity of dating where you never have to take off the mask, where both people try to match without ever revealing themselves.

quote:

---

And eventually she wont be attractive or fit. How will you see her then?

---

I won't see her. I'll be dead. Unless she gets fat and ugly in the next ten years.

quote:

---

I knew things were getting weird when I started seeing so many childless adults regularly going to Disney, having a Disney honeymoon, etc

---

They sound emotionally stunted.