re: She strikes again

quote:

---

WHAT? Is she serious? What's her reasoning why college should be free? 

---

why shouldn't it be? The average student in Louisiana leaves college $28,000 in debt. you think that's a good idea?

to make college free, for every student in America, would cost $47 billion, and without even blinking we just INCREASED the defense budget by $60 billion, so don't tell me we can't afford free tuition.

quote:

---

Huh? Maybe they should clean themselves up before asking us to clean them up.

---

they are "us". they're Americans. the Fed has now spent almost 150 billion cleaning up after Katrina. were you Mr Self Reliance then too?

quote:

---

He isn't a he FYI

---

Yeah i figured bloodflow was a broad.

quote:

---

In fact there are quite a few who I believe should lose the vote long before most women do.

---

Ok. The woman thing was not what you were saying. You just want to be the arbitor of who votes and who doesn't. Cool.

“Free” college might actually be the worst idea ever. Too many people go to college as is.

quote:

---

suffrage is simply the right to vote in a political election and thus has nothing to do with gender, except in such cases as suffrage is denied because of gender. I have never suggested that should be the case.

In fact there are quite a few who I believe should lose the vote long before most women do.

---

I know that...like I said, it's not the voting that's the problem, it's the stupidity of the voter, regardless of gender.

quote:

---

Ok. The woman thing was not what you were saying. You just want to be the arbitor of who votes and who doesn't. Cool.

---

Uh, I've always been quite upfront about that on this board . We allow too many idiots to vote, PERIOD. That's how you end up with morons like this woman running for office. We can get mad at the idiots in Congress all we want, but it's pointless, because they are the crooked piles of shite that we elected. Term limits won't solve this, the only that will is a smarter electorate. Now realizing this, we must also realize that some people just are never going to be smarter.

That these standards would for sure disenfranchise a larger percentage of some groups than others is being honest about things. I mean you surely wouldn't suggest , for example, that because the average Asian is smarter than the average Caucasian that some smart Asians be disenfranchised just to "make things fair" would you?

quote:

---

Uh, I've always been quite upfront about that on this board . We allow too many idiots to vote, PERIOD. That's how you end up with morons like this woman running for office. We can get mad at the idiots in Congress all we want, but it's pointless, because they are the crooked piles of shite that we elected. Term limits won't solve this, the only that will is a smarter electorate. Now realizing this, we must also realize that some people just are never going to be smarter.

---

Yeah, picking who can vote and not vote would never backfire. Not at all..

quote:

---

Bush:
- Incredibly expensive war

---

Would not have been necessary if Clinton had taken the Sudan up on their offer to come and get bin Laden back in the late 1990's ( true story)

quote:

---

- Bailouts

---

Won't argue, other than most of the bad lending criteria was cheered on by Democrats . They started all of the b.s. of championing 100% financing......and then when the market acted properly, were all too happy to embrace Bush's bailouts

quote:

---

Trump:
- Cuts the frick out of taxes while.trying to build a wall.

---

Overall negligible cost........Subsidies provided to people(and insurance companies) under the ACA dwarf the cost of 2 walls

quote:

---

increased defense spending.

---

WE are going to need all that stuff for the war with Russia you guys are trying to start

quote:

---

wants "space force."

---

This idea has been on the books since the Clinton Admin and will continue to be a brain fart

quote:

---

wants infrastructure bill.

---

Not a bad idea

quote:

---

Measured for fiscal years 2001-2008, Federal spending under President Bush averaged 19.0% of GDP, just below his predecessor President Bill Clinton at 19.2% GDP, although tax receipts were substantially lower at 17.1% GDP versus 18.4% GDP."

---

Is it your contention that we should donate more to our overlords in Washington so they can find really stupid things to spend it on. That just means we were paying Clinton too much money during the 1990's


You are still a twat.

quote:

---

There are entirely too many uninformed people voting. However, you do not get to impose arbitrary limits on voting rights any more than others get to impose arbitrary limits on 2nd Amendment rights, free speech rights or any other rights guaranteed by the Constitution

---

Of course I don't get to, but I do get to advocate for changing the COTUS so that I can do so.

Which is exactly the reason I laugh at people who bitch about those who would like to change the 2nd Amendment. Hello, that's exactly how our system of government works..