Started By
Message

re: Second Shooter Theory

Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:25 am to
Posted by FreedomBarefoot
42° parallel
Member since Aug 2016
2502 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:25 am to
If there was a second shooter it would be possible he had silencer.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178638 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Wait... this kid was shooting distance with a red dot?


yes but we're pretty sure people are ignoring the fact that he also had a magnifier in front the red dot which is common on AR platforms.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8589 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:26 am to
quote:

We know 100% that Cooks fired first


How many shots?

quote:

how that 2nd assassin-shooter fires last


Who said anything about firing last? Now tell me where in the stands, in relation to Trump were the others hit? Directly behind? To the side? Same plane? Lower? Higher?

quote:

It's all but confirmed


That the FBI and SS can't be trusted with doing this investigation.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
17859 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:26 am to
Man go the frick away
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178638 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:27 am to
quote:

If there was a second shooter it would be possible he had silencer.


which shot killed the shooter?

everyone assume the 2nd one was a finishing shot but not sure why a finishing shot is needed when you blew out the back of his head through the mouth.
Posted by DarkDrifter
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2011
5610 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:27 am to
quote:

If there was a second shooter it would be possible he had silencer


Audio would still pick it up.. and it's a suppressor not a silencer
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475638 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:31 am to
quote:

How many shots?

3, apparently...per the acoustics at least.

quote:

The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A,


quote:

Who said anything about firing last?

We know, per the acoustics that Vox brought up, who fired first and 2nd.

The only one that the acoustics haven't identified 100% (but it's likely) is the last shot.

quote:

That the FBI and SS can't be trusted with doing this investigation.

Take it up with Vox. He's the one who brought this article up in the first place.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475638 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Man go the frick away

No

Keep reading. You may learn something
Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
2906 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Has it been confirmed that the CS team that's been under scrutiny (for the shooter coming off his scope) actually fired?


I’ve watched video of those two, doesn’t appear either fired.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
17859 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:37 am to
lol
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178638 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:38 am to
quote:

I’ve watched video of those two, doesn’t appear either fired.


It’s been reported that they did not and that video wouldn’t have confirmed it neither cause they were cut off the following moments.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47459 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:42 am to
How come we never see you scold the left for their insane takes like “Trump staged this” or “Right wing rhetoric is to blame” or any number of psychotic conspiracies the left has been pumping 24/7 since this happened? And don’t you dare say those ideas aren’t being shared on here.

But the first time someone on the right peddles in conspiracies you move into the thread like a serial squatter.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42506 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:43 am to
quote:

It seems that people are falling into the “there’s more smoke so it must be a fire” trap. They are forgetting that all these sites and podcasters have a vested interest in getting you to click and listen to their latest theory.


There are a lot of people with agendas and with all the BS out there, they are taking attention away from Trump.

Don’t get me wrong, I too want to know how this could happen, and how did the SS become so inept. We need an accounting of his this all went down, but we don’t need people making stuff up.

Remember too, the same government responsible for delivering the mail is also in charge of guarding presidents.
Posted by Speckhunter2012
Lake Charles
Member since Dec 2012
8593 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:47 am to
quote:

a logical fallacy that lack of evidence is evidence of something.

You combine that fallacy with (1) a desire to promote a narrative and (2) ignoring reality, literally any content can be create


And now SFP understands Lawfare. Congrats.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
17859 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:47 am to
Because he’s a douche bag frickin liberal
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475638 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:54 am to
quote:

How come we never see you scold the left for their insane takes like “Trump staged this” or “Right wing rhetoric is to blame”


That is done, but not on here. Why would I address "the left" here? Who is there to address? The opportunity doesn't really exist b/c very few even center-left posters consistently post.

I respond to BamaAtl when appropriate.

quote:

And don’t you dare say those ideas aren’t being shared on here.

Leftist conspiracies are shared on here by non-leftists posters attacking them outright, almost exclusively.

Are you asking me why I don't jump on a dog pile? Why would I?

quote:

But the first time someone on the right peddles in conspiracies you move into the thread like a serial squatter.

Because they've largely destroyed this board and I'm hoping one day it moves back to sanity and actual, intelligent political discussion again.
Posted by FreedomBarefoot
42° parallel
Member since Aug 2016
2502 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Audio would still pick it up.


Even if they shot from inside the open window in vox's post.

quote:

and it's a suppressor not a silencer


You can shop for suppressors at the silencer shop https://www.silencershop.com/ but you be word police
This post was edited on 7/18/24 at 11:03 am
Posted by Mac Power
Member since Jul 2019
463 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 11:01 am to
quote:

yes but we're pretty sure people are ignoring the fact that he also had a magnifier in front the red dot which is common on AR platforms.


That makes a lot more sense. I haven't seen a clear photo of the weapon used yet.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
37737 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 11:02 am to
quote:

When you leave reality, anything is possible.

We know. You have unequivocally proven this theory for many years and we have all born witness to the validity of your claim.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47459 posts
Posted on 7/18/24 at 11:02 am to
No one elected you to “fix” this forum dipshit. Further, no one is longing for some version of this forum that you personally prefer. Most of us dislike you deeply.

So go elsewhere if you don’t like it. You sure af aren’t winning hearts and minds with your one sided, contrarian, war of attrition, acksywully, condescending-arse posting style.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram