- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS votes 5-4 against Texas, Biden admin can remove border razor wire
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:30 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:30 pm to Indefatigable
It’s been broken for 40 plus years. They’ve been making openly political decisions that hurt us for decades now.
1
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:31 pm to Indefatigable
On this Roberts is being consistent. He has been against the Court being used as a legislative body of last resort. Just like in Obamacare. He's basically saying that this should be a legislative issue and he is not for using the court to rescue the legislative where it fails
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:35 pm to KiwiHead
Texas is being forsaken by the government. We can't rely on them to protect our border. We are now not allowed to defend it ourselves. We are sinking faster than the titanic.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:37 pm to loogaroo
quote:
This is the court's responsibility by design.
Sure, it’s the courts responsibility to tell Congress that it’s Congress’s problem.
The founders absolutely never envisioned or intended for the Court to make policy determinations.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:37 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
He has been against the Court being used as a legislative body of last resort. Just like in Obamacare. He's basically saying that this should be a legislative issue and he is not for using the court to rescue the legislative where it fails
You mean, like exactly what he did do in Sebelius?
There was a glaring, fatal flaw in the law and he was more than happy to "save" the law by adopting a position that even Obama's DOJ wasn't arguing.
And don't even get me started with the absence of a severability clause, which means the whole law should have been tossed when the mandate was deemed unconstitutional.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:38 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
The courts & many other government entities have decided that we are the enemies
Maybe so. But if this is the decision you’re using as evidence, you’re off base.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:38 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
The founders absolutely never envisioned or intended for the Court to make policy determinations
Yet, it has, since almost its beginning.
This post was edited on 1/22/24 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:38 pm to udtiger
quote:
You don't get decisions like Obergfell and Seblius from courts that honor the Constitution.
The present court didn’t render those decisions.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:39 pm to udtiger
quote:
Yet, it has, since almost it's beginning.
I said nothing about whether it has or hasn’t. I addressed a comment about the founder’s intent.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:39 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
They’ve been making openly political decisions that hurt us for decades now.
And so they should just keep doing it?
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:41 pm to udtiger
quote:
There was a glaring, fatal flaw in the law and he was more than happy to "save" the law by adopting a position that even Obama's DOJ wasn't arguing. And don't even get me started with the absence of a severability clause, which means the whole law should have been tossed when the mandate was deemed unconstitutional.
No one here disagrees.
That means more bad decisions should be made in the future?
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:41 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
quote:
You don't get decisions like Obergfell and Seblius from courts that honor the Constitution.
The present court didn’t render those decisions
Oh, please...
The Constitution is the Constitution.
The law is the law.
These were anti-constitutional POLICY DRIVEN decisions written by Anthony Kennedy (GOP appointee) and John Roberts (GOP appointee).
The very thing you Pollyannaishly claim it doesn't do.
The Court makes the decisions it wants to make.
Five black robed traitors want open borders.
So frick them.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:42 pm to Fun Bunch
Biden has gone against SCOTUS rulings several times.
TEXAS SHOULD BE TEXAS AND DO WHAT TEXAS NEEDS TO DO TO SUPPORT THEIR BORDER.
Roberts can GFH he is such a tool.
TEXAS SHOULD BE TEXAS AND DO WHAT TEXAS NEEDS TO DO TO SUPPORT THEIR BORDER.
Roberts can GFH he is such a tool.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:44 pm to udtiger
Mmk. Yea frick the Court. Let’s undermine its legitimacy constantly.
That will work in our favor.
That will work in our favor.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:45 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
None of them wear their Catholicism on their sleeve the way ACB does. None of them are driven by their religion.
Justice Thomas regarding his Catholic faith:
quote:
He said his Catholic faith does not conflict with judicial opinions and that his favorite prayer, one which hangs on the wall of his office, is the Litany of Humility.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:49 pm to ob1pimpbobi
Then demand of your legislators that they do something. Don't rely on the Court to allow the legislative to punt. That is what both sides are doing or not doing and hoping that SCOTUS does their job for them. The border and immigration are federal responsibilities that NEED to be addressed by the legislative end and enforced via the executive end.
Do you really want to let them abrogate their responsibilities to 5 unelected judges? Make Congress do its job. Then compel the Executive branch enforce the law. I'm all for controlling and limiting immigration and border enforcement.......I want Congress and the President to do it.....it's their job
Do you really want to let them abrogate their responsibilities to 5 unelected judges? Make Congress do its job. Then compel the Executive branch enforce the law. I'm all for controlling and limiting immigration and border enforcement.......I want Congress and the President to do it.....it's their job
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:51 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Maybe so
There ain't no maybe so
The DOJ is currently going after Catholics Christians parents anyone with white skin or anyone who dares to be a Republican
Do I even need to add all the current discrimination taking place in schools colleges & corporate America with no recourse?
It is the truth & people are rotting in prisons and jails for political persecution right this very second
Your constant pacifist posting to anything that concerns anything right wing while making constant excuses for the Dem side of things is clear as day
You stink to high heavens
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:51 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Let’s undermine its legitimacy constantly
You presume it has any left.
Roberts and Barrett have been cowed by the response to Dobbs, even though it was 100% the correct decision constitutionally.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:53 pm to udtiger
quote:
Abbot should refuse. Period. It's time to get this the frick over with.
“You want treason? Okay we’re outta this mother fricking union. Peace.”
Posted on 1/22/24 at 7:53 pm to Fun Bunch
Page 12 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News