Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS to hear gay Wedding cake case

Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:55 pm to
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67874 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

he made cakes that look like vaginas


What religion does vagina imagery violate?
Posted by Tigerdev
Member since Feb 2013
12287 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

I haven't read this whole thread, but WTF, is that true? Or are you using hyperbole to make a point?
According to the case its true.

quote:

Lawyers for Mr. Mullins and Mr. Craig claim that Mr. Phillips’ argument is specious because he regularly bakes his famous “Vagina Cake,” and “Clitoris Eclairs” for bachelorette parties, which proves he’s actually discriminating against their gay clients based on sexual orientation.
Its a court case so either side could be exaggerating
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37618 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

Tigerdev


Read this nitwit and then come back and post

LINK
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61265 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Lawyers for Mr. Mullins and Mr. Craig claim that Mr. Phillips’ argument is specious because he regularly bakes his famous “Vagina Cake,” and “Clitoris Eclairs” for bachelorette p
I don't think he should be forced to bake cakes he doesn't want to bake (nor should anyone else be forced, for that matter), but if that's true then for me his whole argument about his devout Christian values goes out the window. I don't know any devout Christians who would condone baking vagina cakes. Isn't his argument that he's trying to uphold the sanctity of marriage? With a vagina cake? Please.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46507 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:18 pm to
The guy is such a raging hypocrite that it's laughable, BUT he should have the right to be. Nobody should be able to tell a private business who they have to serve.

Besides, most of the time a business that openly refuses service to a group of people will not survive in this day and age. There are exceptions when it comes to niche businesses but generally speaking it's not a sustainable practice.
Posted by Tigerdev
Member since Feb 2013
12287 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

sn't his argument that he's trying to uphold the sanctity of marriage? With a vagina cake? Please.
I tend to agree...Plus his own statements on the matter state clearly that his motives for refusing service have to do with the customer's homosexuality. This brings it into civil rights territory for me...
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46507 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

I don't think he should be forced to bake cakes he doesn't want to bake (nor should anyone else be forced, for that matter), but if that's true then for me his whole argument about his devout Christian values goes out the window. I don't know any devout Christians who would condone baking vagina cakes. Isn't his argument that he's trying to uphold the sanctity of marriage? With a vagina cake? Please.


If you dig deep enough, it's usually the case with these stories. At the end of the day the angry liberals are usually right in these cases in practice (though not in principle). It's rarely a genuine moral dilemma.

But again, it doesn't change things in principle. He should be allowed to tell any customer he so chooses to piss off.
Posted by crazyatthecamp
Member since Nov 2006
2100 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:30 pm to
Bs. Refusal because of a homosexual marriage celebration.

No different if 2 straight people wanted a gay wedding cake for their sister.

Its the wedding part. The gay wedding part.

Gay birthdays? Fine.
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:34 pm to
Any business should be able to refuse any service to any person for any reason.

Posted by baobabtiger
Member since May 2009
4720 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

Actually, it's worse than that. The bakers agreed to sell them a stock wedding cake..no problem


Those homos were looking to stir up trouble. They’ll get theirs.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 7:36 pm
Posted by Perfect Circle
S W Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6846 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:48 pm to
But don't privately owned businesses have the right to refuse service to anyone?
That's how many of these bars operate. They have a sign prominently displayed saying this very thing.
What's the difference here?
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

But don't privately owned businesses have the right to refuse service to anyone? That's how many of these bars operate. They have a sign prominently displayed saying this very thing. What's the difference here?


Yes, a business owner can refuse to accommodate anyone, without reason. However, and it's a big however, he cannot consistently refuse to serve customers from a group, whether it's a protected group or not. That is discrimination.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 8:03 pm
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

Nope. Just refusing to return to it.

I doubt you ever left it. Try to learn something new.
Posted by Lee Chatelain
I love the OT!
Member since Oct 2008
11342 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

Gay couple should have just went to another store. That's the beauty of our country.


Wonder why they didn't?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140393 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:29 pm to
You have no right to a cake. Schools, yeah. Cake? Hell no. Go to another gay friendly baker.

Hell, I bet half of bakers are gay AF.
Posted by mattgr1983
Austin, Tx
Member since Oct 2012
2434 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

Too bad our country has fallen to the point that a case like this is even necessary



I know, right? Just bake the fricking cake.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140393 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:32 pm to
Bake your own cake for your soon to be husband.
Posted by Tigerdev
Member since Feb 2013
12287 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:36 pm to
Negative. Civil Rights Act of 1964...private businesses cannot refuse service on the basis of race, religion etc.

So what you posted is inaccurate in terms of the statement "businesses have the right to refuse service to anyone"...they cant if its on the basis of something covered by civil rights act
Posted by mattgr1983
Austin, Tx
Member since Oct 2012
2434 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

Bake your own cake for your soon to be husband.



Oh, I get it. I must be gay because I think discrimination should be illegal.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140393 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:37 pm to
No. You are not a woman?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram