- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS tells trannies/multigenders to eat it
Posted on 11/6/25 at 4:01 pm to BTROleMisser
Posted on 11/6/25 at 4:01 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
They want her to try and redeem herself after the last horrible dissent.
Didn't really work out, did it?
0
Posted on 11/6/25 at 4:17 pm to udtiger
Proper decision for so many reasons.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 4:18 pm to StansberryRules
quote:
or your "place of birth" identity.
Weirdly enough I'm not sure they care much about that on the passport. I wasn't born in the US and no one tried to double check that claim on my passport
Posted on 11/6/25 at 5:13 pm to MMauler
quote:
You forgot the part where it says this, the federal government is likely to win.
That's more of a statement for the legal standard for a stay than a substantive win.
There is a 3-factor test to authorize a stay:
1. Likelihood of success
2. Irreparable harm
3. Balance of hardships
Notice how the court covers all 3? It's just an assessment of meeting the legal standard for a stay.
You're reading too much into it, although I imagine the government will win.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 5:45 pm to udtiger
We're all about our freedoms until we ain't
Posted on 11/6/25 at 5:54 pm to udtiger
Besides the wise latina and the biology expert, who was the third...
Posted on 11/6/25 at 6:17 pm to udtiger
Enough with these people cutting up their genitals in search of new gender identity and then when they regret their decision they expect taxpayers to pay to undo their mistake.
Dude, that's not your vagina - that's your colon.
Dude, that's not your vagina - that's your colon.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 6:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It just looks like a stay was issued on a district court ruling
And what is the immediate impact of this 6-3 ruling? On a federal document thats issued for a 10-year time frame?
Posted on 11/6/25 at 6:47 pm to udtiger
From what I'm reading, even the liberals on the SC are sick and tired of Jackson's antics. 
Posted on 11/6/25 at 6:57 pm to udtiger
What if someone is born a female, but they have a big ol penis?
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:21 pm to Mile40Saskatchewan
quote:
How they allowed a negro woman to attend a college and get a job with educated white folks is a mindboggler. (burp)
This has nothing to do with it.
She is a proven dumbarse regardless of skin color, state of her birth and alleged education.
She was not familiar with specific articles of the constitution and passed on defining what a woman is. Race has nothing to do with her stupidity.
Thanks
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're reading too much into it,
That's rich coming from you.
The believer of all things from collusion hoax to pee dossier to impeached on a perfect phone call, to J6 not being PARTIALLY set up by Pelosi and the PTB in DC.
And the 2 ultimate SFP fails, there is such thing as Lawfare and there is no Sex/Pedo trafficking within our country or being smuggled into our country.
Over 300K still missing kids? I am sure they are in Waterloo Iowa going to private schools.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:37 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:
The believer of all things from collusion hoax t
What?
quote:
to pee dossier t
Again, what?
You're either very ignorant or just lying.
quote:
and there is no Sex/Pedo trafficking within our country or being smuggled into our country.
Lying. You're just lying. Have to be.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:42 pm to udtiger
quote:
Displaying passport holders’ sex at birth no more offends equal protection principles than displaying their country of birth—in both cases, the Government is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment.
quote:
For these reasons, the Government is likely to succeed on the merits. And the District Court’s grant of class-wide re-lief enjoins enforcement of an Executive Branch policy with foreign affairs implications concerning a Government document.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News