re: Scholars say pedophilia is a sexual orientation that should be accepted

quote:

---

When they start claiming that 12 year olds can decide to get permanent, life-altering hormone treatment before they can decide to get a tattoo, they've tossed out the "adult" firewall. It's logically inconsistent to claim in the next breath that the same 12 year old can't decide to have sex with a 25 year old.

---

Point out the sentence where I predict that pedophilia is on its way. I don't think I've used the word prior to your lie about what I posted.

No prison. They cannot be reformed...execution only.

quote:

---

I'm not as impressed with SFP's brain as he is

---

I personally don't think there's anything wrong with his brain.

I think the problem is his ego.

Before I retired I employed medical doctors and they were the same way.

They obviously had high IQs, but they would do some of the dumbest stuff that any five year old could see was stupid, and they would do it in service of their egos, which were substantial.

I had one who was double-board certified in a speciality that required a lot of brain power, but his entire life was total chaos because he wanted to be regarded as an "eccentric," and he could never accept that he was wrong about anything, so he was constantly getting in altercations, refusing to pay bills and having judgements leveled against him, etc. We had to write him paper checks because he was protesting some financial judgement against him and wouldn't keep a bank account to prevent them from tracking his income. He literally cashed his checks and hid stacks of cash around his apartment, in couch cushions and the like. And you can imagine how much money he made.

He thought it made him look really cool to blare hardcore punk music at ear splitting volumes in the middle of the night, so he was evicted from his luxury apartment.

I could go on, but you get the idea.

And that was just one M.D., although he was the worst. I could tell lots of stories about how dumb those smart people acted.

So I'm well acquianted with the SFPs of the world.

Death

Taxes




SFP spending hours and hours trying to convince this board that some painfully obvious sex crime isn't a thing

quote:

---

Back to top
SFP simpin for kiddie diddlers is not even shocking....it's expected.

---

He's just picking up Hanks argument.

A year ago SFP claimed this push for child trannyism wasnt mainstream. that it was fringe.

quote:

---

Point out the sentence where I predict that pedophilia is on its way.

---

You either make the prediction or admit there is no logical association between the two concepts.

quote:

---

When they start claiming that 12 year olds can decide to get permanent, life-altering hormone treatment before they can decide to get a tattoo, they've tossed out the "adult" firewall. It's logically inconsistent to claim in the next breath that the same 12 year old can't decide to have sex with a 25 year old.

---

This statement involves 2 conditions, one that exists (12 year olds undergoing transgender surgery) and one that does not exist (accepting 12 year olds having the ability to consent to sex with 25 year olds).

Either the acceptance of one condition denotes future acceptance of the other (especially "in the next breath" , which denotes future conditions)

or

The two conditions are not logically related in any way, and therefore the condition that does not exist may (or may not) manifest randomly, as it has no actual or logical association with the condition that actually exists.

quote:

---

SFP is confusing opinion and facts.

---

No

The claims and predictions made when gay marriage was legalized are facts (we're not discussing the veracity of them, only that they were made).

The association of transgender surgery and pedophilia is a fact, as they have no real overlap in terms of reality.

quote:

---

SFP spending hours and hours trying to convince this board that some painfully obvious sex crime isn't a thing

---

I've said clearly any child abuse should be prosecuted. It exists and should be dealt with harshly.

quote:

---

Wrong.

---

OK, then

quote:

---

The two conditions are not logically related in any way, and therefore the condition that does not exist may (or may not) manifest randomly, as it has no actual or logical association with the condition that actually exists.

---

quote:

---

We can discuss what I said

---

Your biggest issue is trying to create a logical relationship to the 2 concepts, which was my original response to this line of argument.

You are correct, once it's established there is no logical relationship between the two concepts, there is no future prediction (that was the 2nd way I responded to your argument, FIWW). I fully admit that (and did so in my post).

quote:

---

Your biggest issue

---

Is thinking you could discuss anything honestly.