- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Salon: What if the DNC Russian “hack” was really a leak after all?
Posted on 8/15/17 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 8/15/17 at 2:52 pm
A new report raises questions media and Democrats would rather ignore
This is the report by The Nation Salon is referring to: I started a thread on it last week.
Is this how you let the left wing down easily from confirmation bias fueled by their leaders?
This is the report by The Nation Salon is referring to: I started a thread on it last week.
Is this how you let the left wing down easily from confirmation bias fueled by their leaders?
Posted on 8/15/17 at 2:53 pm to GumboPot
that cartoon
i love that meme
i love that meme
Posted on 8/15/17 at 2:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
that cartoon
i love that meme
I was looking for a reason to post it.
Posted on 8/15/17 at 2:55 pm to GumboPot
Yes, it will be a slow burn. No one will outright admit it. But at some point, everyone will privately agree and then people will be saying "I never thought that."
Posted on 8/15/17 at 2:58 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
There is no evidence for any of these theories — and neither VIPS nor Lawrence in his article attempt to link Rich’s murder to the hack/leak of information from the DNC. (Washington police have said since the night of Rich’s death that he was the victim of an armed robbery attempt that went wrong.) Nonetheless, the emergence of this information may lend credence to those theories for those who want to believe them.
aka, WE HAVE PROOF.
HIS NAME WAS SETH RICH
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:03 pm to GumboPot
Salon bends the knee! MAGA!
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:06 pm to GumboPot
Conveniently coincides with idiot Nazi LARPers showing their arse in a way that hurts Trump.
Funny that Spencer would embrace this stupid shite now after being careful to avoid it for so long.
Mighty (funny)
Funny that Spencer would embrace this stupid shite now after being careful to avoid it for so long.
Mighty (funny)
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:19 pm to GumboPot
quote:
A new report raises questions
Nope.
Well maybe it raises questions for you if you know very little about the hacking.
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:19 pm to Decatur
quote:
Well maybe it raises questions for you if you know very little about the hacking.
until we get an independent analysis of that server, statements like that are pretty ironic
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:20 pm to Decatur
Decatur, why do you think Salon would publish this? Seems like a silly thing to report on
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:22 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Decatur, why do you think Salon would publish this? Seems like a silly thing to report on
It is very silly. Where are their editors?
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:24 pm to Decatur
Could this be some vague red meat for Bernie bros? At least on Internet forums, they aren't as intrigued by Russia hacking as your average Dem, and instead blame Dem party/Hillary for all the woes
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:24 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
everyone will privately agree and then people will be saying "I never thought that."
Not everyone. Maxine Waters types will go to their graves saying," Muh Russians!"
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
until we get an independent analysis of that server
This might be the biggest red herring of the lot.
Multiple firms have checked Crowdstrike's work while other firms have gone beyond leveraging other data.
Some people just want to muddy the water on attribution for some reason.
This post was edited on 8/15/17 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:26 pm to Decatur
quote:
Some people just want to muddy the water on attribution for some reason.
uh, not allowing actual, first hand, and independent analysis of the server is not "some reason"
that's a big deal
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
uh, not allowing actual, first hand, and independent analysis of the server is not "some reason" that's a big deal
It is wholly unnecessary. You can doubt their findings all you want. The people who do this for a living and who would have a lot to gain from discrediting a competitor all agree on the findings.
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
There is much more information about all of this in the public domain than many posters here would lead you to believe. You always hear about Muh Crowdstrike around here but their analysis (at least the portion made public) is very limited.
It's public knowledge which spoof sites the hackers created, partial targeting lists, command and control architecture used, etc.
Anyone claiming the DNC was not hacked should be laughed out of the room.
It's public knowledge which spoof sites the hackers created, partial targeting lists, command and control architecture used, etc.
Anyone claiming the DNC was not hacked should be laughed out of the room.
This post was edited on 8/15/17 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 8/15/17 at 3:43 pm to Decatur
Anyone still hanging on to collusion as the reason Hillary lost needs to be mocked til death.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News