- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Russia says any peacekeeping troops must be from Non NATO Countries
Posted on 3/16/25 at 4:36 pm to John Barron
Posted on 3/16/25 at 4:36 pm to John Barron
quote:Sixty percent is above average ?
and my List was above average 6/10.
That might get you a job cleaning bedpans
but in the real world and every educational standard it's failure
0
Posted on 3/16/25 at 4:40 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
because I wasn't pathetic enough to ask AI about myself
I didn't ask about myself Owl. Gumbo started the thread and asked who was the top posters on the poliboard and it gave names and breakdowns. Stop trying to twist shite like you always do
LINK
This post was edited on 3/16/25 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 3/16/25 at 4:47 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
K. Glad you're caught up, sport. 
Posted on 3/16/25 at 4:47 pm to John Barron
quote:I didn't say you did,, only I wasn't pathetic enough to do... I'm not twisting anything I'm saying for the public record i'm not pathetic enough to seek out or put value in AI's opinion of me
I didn't ask about myself Owl. Gumbo started the thread and asked who was the top posters on the poliboard and it gave names and breakdowns. Stop trying to twist shite like you always do
I know people have tried but do you not understand how AI works
it's just tabulating all of the efforts on here
it's can't really assign any true value
And if AI somehow recognizes the exhaustive and exhausting efforts you make on here
no shite
It tabulates effort it does not check facts
all a high ranking by AI does is prove you try too hard
But if I started posting sixty threads a day and then engaging everybody that commented on those threads and get upvote by posting inane shite
I'm pretty sure I could raise my profile with AI
You do realize when people upvote your post they're upvoting a tweet or the information you've shared
they're not necessarily saying that you as a bedpan cleaner are valued as a deep thinker on issue of geopolitical importance
This post was edited on 3/16/25 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 3/16/25 at 4:48 pm to John Barron
You realize that you posting about Ron almost exclusively and then calling anyone else obsessed with Ron is completely retarded, right?
I sure hope this is just a part of your retard act and it’s not actually how your pea brain works.
I sure hope this is just a part of your retard act and it’s not actually how your pea brain works.
This post was edited on 3/16/25 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 3/16/25 at 4:57 pm to roadGator
quote:
You realize that you posting about Ron almost exclusively
You realize how dumb you look when less than 1% of my threads are about Ron DeSantis. The majority of my post were Polls during the election, Trump News, and Russia/Ukraine War. You are projecting again roadgator...You are the one obsessed with Ron, not me. Matter of fact on Twitter... it's a known illness of the DeSimps
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 3/16/25 at 4:59 pm to John Barron
quote:
Jjdoc Barron
Why did you stop posting on your main account?
Posted on 3/16/25 at 4:59 pm to John Barron
I realize someone so stupid can’t see it.
Just clearly say you aren’t Ronsessed. So we can laugh.
Just clearly say you aren’t Ronsessed. So we can laugh.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 4:59 pm to John Barron
quote:Less than one percent could easily still be in the hundreds which would still make you the most obsessed poster about De Santis
You realize how dumb you look when less than 1% of my threads are about Ron DeSantis.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 5:02 pm to roadGator
Iowa didn't take Note. Chris pegged you guys early 
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 5:06 pm to John Barron
quote:
I didn't ask about myself Owl. Gumbo started the thread and asked who was the top posters on the poliboard and it gave names and breakdowns. Stop trying to twist shite like you always do
quote:
what’s observable: post frequency, thread longevity, and mentions across discussions, including some X chatter about the site.
quote:
- **John Barron**: Active and prolific, he’s been spotted starting threads that trend—like one on March 3, 2025, about the Trump admin refusing to co-sponsor something (details vague without full access). His volume and engagement hint at respect for keeping the board buzzing, even if it’s MAGA-leaning red meat.
quote:
names like these carry cred for different reasons: volume (John Barron)...Without full data, this is a snapshot—respect there is as much about surviving the scrum as winning it.
Let me interpret this for you:
It has access to not much more than names and titles.
It links being obnoxious and prolific with "respect".
Posted on 3/16/25 at 5:09 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
You realize that you posting about Ron almost exclusively
He said almost exclusively Owl. I know reading comprehension is not your cup of tea but this is getting a little ridiculous.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 5:20 pm to John Barron
quote:You do realize that me pointing out that you still post more about de Santis than anybody else was the point I was making ,,,
He said almost exclusively Owl. I know reading comprehension is not your cup of tea but this is getting a little ridiculous.
the obsession, as indicated by raw numbers
something AI might pick up on.
This is a separate criticism from exclusively posting about the desantis
I was not responding to him I was responding to you ,, hence quoting you
Reading comprehension
This post was edited on 3/16/25 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 3/16/25 at 5:24 pm to John Barron
Knew you couldn’t say it.
Because you are a dishonest pussy.
Because you are a dishonest pussy.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 5:30 pm to Lynxrufus2012
quote:
Japan, Australia, Argentina, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia
This is the way.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 5:32 pm to roadGator
Now I realize why you DeSimps were so mad when I started posting positive Trump polls. You thought he was going to lose and Ron was going to be the new Face of the Republican party in 2028...
Meanwhile he could not beat Nikki Haley in his home state
Meanwhile he could not beat Nikki Haley in his home state
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 3/16/25 at 5:34 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
Japan, Australia, Argentina, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia
This is the way.
So with this math would you be expecting the United States to pick up the difference in the Pacific theater v potential China and North Korean aggression/interests
and if you suggest India pick up that slack..
with a looming Pakistan falling into civil war and nuclear weapons available to Muslim warlords it would be inevitable to strain India's resources
Posted on 3/16/25 at 5:34 pm to John Barron
quote:
Jjdoc Barron
Why did you stop posting on your main account?
Posted on 3/16/25 at 5:36 pm to Lord of the Hogs
quote:you're a retard
but they would be more trustworthy than any NATO force
Posted on 3/16/25 at 5:37 pm to John Barron
So you're trying to change the conversation in this thread to Desantis even though you started THIS thread talking about Russia-Ukranian settlements in regard to peacekeeping forces
I really shouldn't say talking about
you were reposting other people's efforts, including AI which you tried to pass off as your own
And bragged about getting sixty percent
as if that's an accomplishment
Oh and you also tried to criticize me for reading comprehension yet you were the one who couldn't comprehend the flow of the conversation by reading who was responding to what
I'd say you're doing a lot worse than sixty percent in this thread
I really shouldn't say talking about
you were reposting other people's efforts, including AI which you tried to pass off as your own
And bragged about getting sixty percent
as if that's an accomplishment
Oh and you also tried to criticize me for reading comprehension yet you were the one who couldn't comprehend the flow of the conversation by reading who was responding to what
I'd say you're doing a lot worse than sixty percent in this thread
Page 5 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News