- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Roberts and Barrett - the moment was too big for them
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:36 pm to TFH
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:36 pm to TFH
Attention dumbass: the 13th amendment ended slavery, 14th amendment gave slaves citizenship, and 15th amendment gave them the right to vote. Congrats on your TEMU education, it’s quite impressive!!
1
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:39 pm to the808bass
Gonna' name mine Berthriterroriss
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:44 pm to the808bass
quote:
Holy shite. Do you think that wasn’t the purpose?
Is purpose more important than text?
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:46 pm to Rip Torner
quote:
Attention dumbass: the 13th amendment ended slavery, 14th amendment gave slaves citizenship, and 15th amendment gave them the right to vote. Congrats on your TEMU education, it’s quite impressive!!
If I’m a dumbass then you don’t even merit mention. Might want to check with the Supreme Court as to who the 14th gives citizenship to. Hint: it wasn’t just the slaves. If they wanted it to be just about slaves then they would have said it
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:47 pm to i am dan
quote:
Is it abiding to the constitution or is it abiding to an interpretation of the constitution?
Since the Supreme Court is the final arbiter on the constitution and these treasonous snakes are disagreeing with them….
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:47 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Is purpose more important than text?
No. Did you work on that one for a while?
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:47 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Is purpose more important than text?
Sometimes it is. The doctrine of Legislative Intent. Look it up.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:47 pm to TFH
quote:
Do y’all want justices who follow the constitution or justices who do what you want?
Should decide with the knowledge of the true intentions of the original law
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:48 pm to Bass Tiger
A massive failure by Trump
Appointing ACB….
Appointing ACB….
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:49 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
That system worked for decades when we were living in a different world. Now, we're living in a world where we and other western societies are being legitimately invaded by third world anti-white, anti-American savages who are moving here--and other Western societies--to destroy us, and/or to usher in their islamic sharia law... and take over. Birth right citizenship wasn't conceptualized to allow that and "birth tourism." If you're fine with that you're a fricking moron.
How dense are you that you can’t comprehend the difference between working within the system and “being fine with everyone getting citizenship”?
The Supreme Court is the final authority on what the constitution says. The legislative branch can change the constitution. That is working within the system. Whining like a little bitch about what the Supreme Court says is not working within the system.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:51 pm to NytroBud
quote:
Should decide with the knowledge of the true intentions of the original law
How do we decide intent?
Maybe by interpreting the very words left by those who wrote the legislation? Until you invent a fricking time machine, you’re shite out of luck. You have two options: continue whinging like a little bitch or fight like hell for an amendment.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:52 pm to Snipe
quote:
Lighten up Francis.
The SCOTUS was never going to end birthright citizenship. It's a constructional issue and they are constitutional law justices.
Funny, we came within 1 vote of constitutional law justices coming to a very different conclusion.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:56 pm to TFH
Most here seem to want originalism on some things and others not so much.
That’s why it’s laughable when laissez- faire small govt. Ted Cruz is brought up as a USSC choice around here.
That’s why it’s laughable when laissez- faire small govt. Ted Cruz is brought up as a USSC choice around here.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:56 pm to TFH
quote:
The Supreme Court is the final authority on what the constitution says. The legislative branch can change the constitution.
Oh yeah. Good luck with that. Half of Congress is made up of commies who hate this country and want to "erase whiteness," aka colonial American descendents, history, principles, and culture.
The 14th Amendment was not created so anyone and everyone can come here, especially the millions coming here now with malicious intent and hatred for this country, to shite out a bunch of babies to automatically be "legal U.S. citizens." If you think the 14th Amendment was conceptualized and passed for that purpose, to intentionally harm, invade and destroy the USA... YOU are a fricking retard. frick you.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:58 pm to TFH
quote:
quote:
Should decide with the knowledge of the true intentions of the original law
How do we decide intent?
Maybe by interpreting the very words left by those who wrote the legislation? Until you invent a fricking time machine, you’re shite out of luck. You have two options: continue whinging like a little bitch or fight like hell for an amendment.
"Legislative intent refers to the underlying purpose, goals, and specific meaning that lawmakers had in mind when drafting and passing a particular law. When a statute is ambiguous, vague, or doesn't directly address a modern scenario, courts use legislative intent to interpret and apply the law correctly."
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:59 pm to TFH
Sure thing in the late 1860’s when those amendments came into being literally right after the end of the Civil War they addressed slavery in the other two amendments but the 14th was really referencing Guatemala lol see yourself out boy wonder
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:59 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Oh yeah. Good luck with that. Half of Congress is made up of commies who hate this country and want to "erase whiteness," aka colonial American descendents, history, principles, and culture.
The 14th Amendment was not created so anyone and everyone can come here, especially the millions coming here now with malicious intent and hatred for this country, to shite out a bunch of babies to automatically be "legal U.S. citizens." If you think the 14th Amendment was conceptualized and passed for that purpose, to intentionally harm, invade and destroy the USA... YOU are a fricking retard. frick you.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 2:01 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Sometimes it is. The doctrine of Legislative Intent. Look it up.
When the text is clear and unambiguous nothing further is needed, as it was here
Posted on 6/30/26 at 2:01 pm to boosiebadazz
frick you in your commie cock holster leftist arse too, BoozieBitchAzz.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 2:02 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
quote:
Sometimes it is. The doctrine of Legislative Intent. Look it up.
When the text is clear and unambiguous nothing further is needed, as it was here
WRONG. Again.
Legislative intent refers to the underlying purpose, goals, and specific meaning that lawmakers had in mind when drafting and passing a particular law. When a statute is ambiguous, vague, or doesn't directly address a modern scenario, courts use legislative intent to interpret and apply the law correctly.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News