- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RI middle school had mural of Moloch?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 2:19 pm to Mo Jeaux
Posted on 2/20/26 at 2:19 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
It was reported by the same woman who made the original claim. There has been no corroborating evidence shown at all.
Also reported by Libs of TikTok. And this was reported by a different person:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. We can use our minds and realize there is a deep problem at this school based on what is clearly years of evidence.
1
Posted on 2/20/26 at 2:20 pm to Salviati
quote:
Do you have a source for the school system's released statement other than a link to a Ramona Bessinger tweet, the source of the original tweet?
You can be a moron all you want, but that doesn't mean the rest of us have to join you.
Do you have any evidence that this person is lying, or is that just you hoping?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 2:22 pm to imjustafatkid
That’s a different picture. Where did Libs of TikTok find the press release?
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 2/20/26 at 2:23 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Do you have any evidence that this person is lying, or is that just you hoping?
All of the evidence is pointing to her lying.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 2:24 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
All of the evidence is pointing to her lying.
I have seen no such evidence.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 2:27 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
I have seen no such evidence.
I haven’t seen any evidence of the press release being real or the picture itself (in the context in which has been claimed) for that matter.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 2:29 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
I haven’t seen any evidence of the press release being real or the picture itself (in the context in which has been claimed) for that matter.
But you have. You just admitted you saw that it was reported. You just don't believe the source, even with no basis not to believe it.
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 2/20/26 at 2:29 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:You mean the interpretation of the linguistic and archeological record.
All of this goes against the linguistic and archeological record.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 2:30 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
But you have. You just admitted you saw that it was reported. You just don't believe the source, even with no basis not to believe it.
Are you retarded?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 2:55 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
You mean the interpretation of the linguistic and archeological record.
So tell us what is incorrect about that interpretation, other than the fact that it conflicts with the Biblical narrative.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 3:17 pm to FooManChoo
quote:this guy gets it
No. I believe that the Israelites were covenantally called by God out of Ur (Abram/Abraham), moved to Canaan, moved to Egypt, and then moved back to Canaan where the descendants of Ham, Noah's son, were already living there. The Israelites conquered the Canaanites and lived among them. Many even intermarried with them, even against the command of God.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 3:22 pm to LakeSide Lovin
Maybe you can tell us why that account differs from the linguistic, archeological, and (as SFP pointed out) genetic record then.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 3:24 pm to LakeSide Lovin
quote:
this guy gets it
That interpretation goes against basically all evidence we have on Earth, outside of the Bible. Historical, archeological, linguistic, genetic, etc.
That was the point of my question to permit him to establish if he was looking at the evidence we have on Earth or the Bibble.
And I'm sure that the pivot-defense will be "well the Devil created the confusion to make people doubt the Bible".
Posted on 2/20/26 at 3:33 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:It's based on naturalistic assumptions.
So tell us what is incorrect about that interpretation
quote:That's certainly a big factor. The evidence is not brute, and therefore it needs to be interpreted. That's how it is with all science.
other than the fact that it conflicts with the Biblical narrative
Posted on 2/20/26 at 3:34 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
It's based on naturalistic assumptions.
Explain what you mean by this?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 3:54 pm to Night Vision
you guys do know that Instagram isn't an actual news source, right?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
SFP.. lol, this fricking retard
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:28 pm to Madking
The king of the Dunning Kruger Effect speaks
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
Now that’s funny coming from someone so fraudulent he doesn’t even realize it lmao. You probably breast fed until 10 years old.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 4:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Canaanite
Page 16 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News