Started By
Message

re: Rfk Jr tweets about his admiration of pedophile Harvey Milk

Posted on 5/23/24 at 7:41 am to
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 7:41 am to
quote:

I think as AG, RFK is going to be so busy making the scumbags that actually fricked over this country pay that he’s not going to have any time whatsoever to deal with the Second Amendment.


Garland has been busy going after Americans he doesn't like, and he's still made time to frick over the Second Amendment.

quote:

I believe he will do it, which is why I insist Trump appoints him to a major position to oversee this. Fauci murdered my Uncle, and I want RFK to have his head cut off after a fair trial for it.


Trump enabled Fauci and gave him a commendation for murdering your uncle. Why would he allow RFK to do any of that?
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55430 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 7:45 am to
Supporting him and acknowledging that are 2 entirely different things
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
17395 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 9:54 am to
I thought all Democrats voices was bad !!
This post was edited on 5/23/24 at 10:13 am
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Hmmmm…. A lot of RFK negative posts on this board lately

I smell a rat…..


You're right.

Why would RFK tweet "admiration" of Harvey Milk -- of ALL people? I don't believe this was legit.

Some older "incriminating" vids of RFK have emerged reflecting his pre-"awakening" of political reality.

SPECULATION:

Might RFK Jr been "influenced" or "advised" to self-destruct?

Is there a operation afoot to have RFK discredited and removed as a potential "political threat" to the (D)'s?

There was another recent video here at the PT of RFK running down conservatives and Republicans and radio -- it appeared at least 7-8 years old. MANY Progs have since changed many political previous views and positions since then -- including RFK.
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 10:17 am to
quote:

He favors abortion. Strike one
He favors gun control. Strike two
He admires a pedophile Strike three


I believe the man has evolved on several positions -- just as several Dems have since seeing the light (c.2020).

(Moreover, I believe there is an op afoot to discredit and take out RFK from (D) Candidacy consideration. This absurd Harvey Milk tweet makes ZERO sense; It has to have been made either under duress OR was a prank.)
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
14421 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 10:21 am to
quote:

you have the emotional intelligence of a teenage girl


And the actual intelligence of a teenage Labrador
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Trump enabled Fauci and gave him a commendation for murdering your uncle. Why would he allow RFK to do any of that?


I’m pretty sure the AG is decently independent from the President and can do his own thing. Now Trump could stop him from doing it, but I’m relatively confident the first chance RFK got that he’d arrest Fauci and the other Covid criminals.
This post was edited on 5/23/24 at 10:34 am
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
71158 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 10:31 am to
What if this was actual 4d chess to get the media off his arse and actually pull some proggy votes from Biden. It’s not, but kinda fun to think so
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 10:38 am to
The Attorney General can be removed from office. That alone removes any notion of one acting independent of a president.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 10:48 am to
quote:

The Attorney General can be removed from office. That alone removes any notion of one acting independent of a president.


Well I’m aware of that, my point is Trump should be hands off if he makes RFK his AG. Both DeSantis and Vivek said had they won they were going to have RFK in their cabinet, and that’s the most likely position for him, although I’m not sure if the Senate would allow him to be AG.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10861 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 11:15 am to
quote:

It's weird how folks around these parts believe he's gonna peel votes away from Trump.


It's not weird.

Start a thread asking how many posters here would vote for RFK if Trump picks someone they don't like for VP. Do it. You'll be amazed at how many of them will.

Or how many people would like to see RFK be the VP.

Again, populism has no underlying principles. They don't look at RFK's policies or care about them.

There are certain stances on certain policies that they will claim means someone is "Establishment," but that's a ruse. It's just an excuse to attempt to appear objective. If someone they have already accepted as being "Anti-Establishment" takes the same stance, they are completely unconcerned about it.

Policies don't matter to them. Only someone's supposed street cred. Which is why Trump can add $8T to the debt, bomb Syria, follow Democratic Socialist trade policies, scoff at reforming SS/Medicare, etc., etc., etc., and they couldn't care less, but let him float the idea of picking Nikki Haley for VP and they will turn on him with the quickness and pledge to vote for RFK, because that guy opposed COVID vaccines.

(Never mind that he opposes ALL vaccines and has done so for decades, never mind that they have given their children every one of the other 30 or so doses that RFK also opposes without a second thought, never mind that if COVID had never happened they'd laugh at him and call him a nutter instead of "anti-Establishment"...he opposed the one vaccine that identifies him as being "anti-Establishment."
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Trump should be hands off if he makes RFK his AG.


What makes you think he'd be hands off if RFK did something he didn't like?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 11:28 am to
quote:

What makes you think he'd be hands off if RFK did something he didn't like?


Well he’ll stop him then, but if he goes after Fauci and his other conspirators, this is all Trump has to say: “Look, I read Bobby’s book, and there’s a lot of things in there that he’s accused Tony and his associates over. Maybe it’s true, maybe it’s not, but these people will have their day in court and I’m staying out of it. But if even half of what Bobby accuses Tony of is true, then Tony is an absolute disgrace and justice must be served. Thank you.”
This post was edited on 5/23/24 at 11:31 am
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Well he’ll stop him then, but if he goes after Fauci and his other conspirators, this is all Trump has to say


There's a frick ton of wishcasting going on here. Trump still defends Warp Speed. He gave commendations to Fauci and Birx well after most folks knew what was going on. He doesn't regret any of it one bit, and he won't let someone in his cabinet make him look foolish.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10861 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Trump still defends Warp Speed.


And this is exactly what I was talking about above.

I would say he does more than defend it, I would say he still brags about it.

What do you think the reaction would be if Nikki Haley said, "It's a good thing we got the COVID vaccine when we did?"
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 11:39 am to
quote:

I would say he does more than defend it, I would say he still brags about it.


Great point.
Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
35572 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 11:41 am to
Nobody, I mean nobody has the same views/opinions on EVERY SINGLE THING.

This is the fallacy that makes social media so destructive.

Having said that, frick RFK and Milk.
This post was edited on 5/23/24 at 11:42 am
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
14421 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Well he’ll stop him then, but if he goes after Fauci and his other conspirators, this is all Trump has to say: “Look, I read Bobby’s book, and there’s a lot of things in there that he’s accused Tony and his associates over. Maybe it’s true, maybe it’s not, but these people will have their day in court and I’m staying out of it. But if even half of what Bobby accuses Tony of is true, then Tony is an absolute disgrace and justice must be served. Thank you.”


Seek help.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Trump still defends Warp Speed. He gave commendations to Fauci and Birx well after most folks knew what was going on. He doesn't regret any of it one bit, and he won't let someone in his cabinet make him look foolish.


I’m aware and this tied with his continued defense of the intelligence agencies is my biggest frustration with him. Someone needs to tell Trump that there’s no shame in him being fooled in 2020. Almost all of us were to one extent or another, like I got vaxxed (not boosted) and it’s the biggest regret of my life, so there’s no shame so long as you learn your lesson.

The good news is Trump is surrounding himself with people who know this and can hopefully talk some sense into him. I’m hoping he learned his lesson last time because Trump’s friends and enemies have now clearly revealed themselves.

My best hope is that Trump is lying so these fricking assholes don’t flee the country or assassinate him, and his Inauguration will resemble the Red Wedding and destroy the Deep State in one fell swoop.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10861 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Nobody, I mean nobody has the same views/opinions on EVERY SINGLE THING


Sure, but I just looked at his website and he's got 8 policy positions listed.

Of those, I could tell that disagreed with five right off the bat and the other three are sufficiently vague as to be likely disagreements once the details of the agenda are known. Even if I'm wrong about that, that's still only 3/8.

In what absurd universe would I vote for that guy?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram