- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Respect for Marriage Act passed by Senate. Goes to House for final vote.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:15 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:15 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
quote:
"God forbid that we look at the actual language of the [LBGQ+ Polygamy+ / Bestial+ Marriage] legislation..."
Aaah, yes -- "looking at the language" AND "Legislation" -- two altogether different issues (as though any of us got a chance to look at this particular piece of LBGQ+ Guano.)
Other than citing "muh State" bullet points, *have* you actually "looked at the language *fine-print*??
Btw, it's NOT "God" who "forbids" the examination of "special" Acts like this garbage or 'The Patriot Act' for example; It's the Overlord subversives' any proposed Legislation that's been enacted in hours because *IF* read, examined and scrutinized without public debate or consent, said Guano would NOT not pass muster as heads rolled.
quote:
"God forbid that we look at the actual language....when arguing about what the legislation does"
Seriously now??
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 1:18 pm
1
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:15 pm to AggieHank86
quote:No nitwit.
Hence Mick’s use of the word “bill” rather than “statute.”
The bill must pass congressional muster. At that point language in the bill is finally set. The bill has not arrived at that stage. The bill is currently in the House pending approval. Then the bill is sent to the POTUS for his signature.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:16 pm to AggieHank86
Can't the courts say any federal legislation on those topics is unconstitutional if they take power away from states to legislate these areas?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:17 pm to Liberator
I read you post, and must ask one question … are you high?
Most of your posts are incomprehensible gibberish. This one more so than most.
Most of your posts are incomprehensible gibberish. This one more so than most.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:19 pm to AggieHank86
quote:it's already been determined that you're incapable of understanding unless it's written in legalese.
Most of your posts are incomprehensible
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:21 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
It has not passed, Mickey.
Mickey's defense of this Bill is built upon a lie.
He is arguing that the Politicians pursuing this bullshite will NOT do what they most certainly WILL do based on the wording of a Bill which has yet to be modified, changed and raped along it's way to being passed.
Mickey is a fool who takes Politicians, Lawyers and Judges at their word.
Reasonable people do NOT and are simply awaiting the wheeling, dealing, GOP caving and general fkery that ALWAYS accompanies a Bill such as this.
Before all is said and done and this is put to a final vote, Democrats WILL find a way to destroy the lives of normal, productive people who do not fall in line with their agenda.
Anyone who argues otherwise is a liar or a fool.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:22 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Here's the cheatsheet:
Tell me about the rights of two 18y/o's to elope and marry in Nebraska. Illegal.
Tell me about the right of an 11y/o w/ parental consent to marry a 30y/o in California. Legal.
How about, the right of that 11y/o w/ parental consent to marry a 30y/o in Arkansas. Illegal.
How does the US Constitution address those "rights"? It doesn't.
I am not arguing that a state or the fed cannot put in a reasonable curb on a persons right. I believe it is a fundamental right that two consenting have the right to marry. So for your cheat sheet, I would 1&2 are unconstitutional and 3 is not.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:23 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:I do quite well with Standard American English, thank you.
it's already been determined that you're incapable of understanding unless it's written in legalese.
I am STILL trying to identify the language that Liberator was using. The words look like a form of English, for the most part, but the grammar and syntax are another matter entirely.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:25 pm to SoonerK
quote:
I believe it is a fundamental right that two consenting have the right to marry
Because you believe does not make it so.
Should cousins marry? Because many states don't allow first cousins to marry.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:27 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Can the Catholic Church be sued for refusing to marry a gay couple?
Being sued for this is the least of the reasons the Catholic Church should be worried about. If you know, you know.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:27 pm to SoonerK
quote:But they aren't.
I would 1&2 are unconstitutional
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:27 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I do quite well with Standard American English, thank you.
Grammar Nazi Hank DOES have problems differentiating between "accept" and "except", however.
Perhaps a local Community College offers a free remedial reading course hosted by Drag Queens....you should look into it.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:28 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The bill must pass congressional muster. At that point language in the bill is finally set. The bill has not arrived at that stage. The bill is currently in the House pending approval. Then the bill is sent to the POTUS for his signature.
This bill is unlikely to change at this point. The big hurdle was getting Senate approval. Now that it has, the House won't risk it going back to the Senate again. Especially given the fact that they are running out of time to get it passed.
It is extremely likely that this current version of the bill which just passed the Senate will pass in the House next week, then get signed into law by Biden.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:29 pm to squid_hunt
quote:
Where is marriage in the Constitution?
One of the big fears of James Madison when he wrote the Bill of Rights would be that the masses would believe that if it is not listed specifically in the Constitution that they would believe that right does not exist. You are who he was worried about.
Here's what he said in relation to the BoR."The exceptions here or elsewhere in the constitution, made in favor of particular rights, shall not be so construed as to diminish the just importance of other rights retained by the people".
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:30 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:I'd agree with that. But as they say, "Many a slip between the cup and the lip."
It is extremely likely
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:30 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
This bill is unlikely to change at this point. ....It is extremely likely .......
Faith in Democrat Politicians?
Idiot.....
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:32 pm to SoonerK
quote:... and then, there was Amendment Ten.
One of the big fears of James Madison when he wrote the Bill of Rights would be that the masses would believe that if it is not listed specifically in the Constitution that they would believe that right does not exist.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:35 pm to SoonerK
quote:
One of the big fears of James Madison when he wrote the Bill of Rights would be that the masses would believe that if it is not listed specifically in the Constitution that they would believe that right does not exist.
I can see Madison now. "Well of COURSE the supreme court can tell the states they must recognize gay marriage! Duh!!".
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:35 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I would 1&2 are unconstitutional
But they aren't.
Just because it is a law, does not make it constitutional. Have either of those three been challenged to the SC?
How about this. Would it be unconstitutional for a state to pass a law that could arrest you for having sex with another consenting adult?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:36 pm to SoonerK
quote:
consenting adult?
You keep using this term like it means something.
Page 12 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News