Started By
Message
locked post

Republicans Eye Boom in Oil and Gas Leases to Pay for Tax Cuts

Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:26 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29244 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:26 am
quote:

Republicans in Congress have drafted plans for a significant increase in oil, gas, and coal lease sales in order to foot the bill for President Trump’s tax cut plans, Bloomberg has reported, citing the draft.

Per that document, the House Natural Resources Committee is eyeing at least four lease sales for the coastal plain of the Alaska Arctic National Wildlife Refuge over the next ten years. The plan also envisages a restart of the lease sales in the National Petroleum Reserve of Alaska plus quarterly onshore oil and gas lease sales and new offshore tenders.

Coal tenders are set for a comeback under the committee’s plan as well, Bloomberg reported, as legislators look for ways to offset the loss of tax revenue, seen at $4.5 trillion. Plans for handling this loss include spending cuts of $2 trillion, Bloomberg noted in its report.

The change in oil and gas lease sale policy follows a tumultuous four years during the Biden administration, which made a solid effort to do away with these as part of its transition efforts and when that failed, the admin tried to limit the acreage on offer. Eventually, a pro-transition judge canceled the administration’s last lease sale on the grounds that it had failed to take into account the effect of exploring for oil and gas on the climate.

With the change of the guard at the White House, energy policies changed, too. Now, the Department of the Interior plans to hold an offshore lease sale again, as soon as this year. The new management at the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is eyeing some 27 billion barrels of oil and close to 55 trillion cu ft of gas—which translates into a lot of federal budget revenues over the years. This is what the point of the House Natural Resources Committee plans are as well—boosting budget revenues while working to establish that energy dominance that helped get Trump elected.


LINK
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Member since Jul 2018
8067 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:43 am to
Whatever it takes. I can't continue spending $70,000 a year in taxes.
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
3738 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:49 am to
Cheap energy + Tariffs to offset income tax is a worth the exercise.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
102789 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:52 am to
quote:

spending cuts of $2 trillion,


Is this per year or 2 trillion over 10 years bullshite
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477249 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:53 am to
quote:

Cheap energy + Tariffs to offset income tax is a worth the exercise.

the math doesn't work and our SOL and economic standing will decline.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
102789 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:55 am to
quote:

the math doesn't work



Show your work for the class
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
9806 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:56 am to
So now you’re an economist. Brilliant!
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29244 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:59 am to
quote:

Is this per year or 2 trillion over 10 years bullshite


It's safe to assume over 10 years. That's how cuts and deficit reductions are always reported by Congress and the White House, no matter who's in charge of either.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
102789 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:07 am to
200 bn a year isn’t even going to make a dent

Needs to be half a trillion minimum per year cut
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29244 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:22 am to
I don't think you can get there without doing something with SS, Medicare and Medicaid, and no one wants to touch that.
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
13204 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 8:26 am to
And moron.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11397 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:11 am to
quote:

200 bn a year isn’t even going to make a dent

Needs to be half a trillion minimum per year cut


You have to start somewhere. What will happen is that Johnson will put forth a spending cut and all the "principled" politicians will vote with the democrats against it, because it is not enough. No spending cut is better than a smaller cut if you can't get the large cut you want to many.

I don't understand why people think everything needs to be done at once. Smaller cuts provide a softer landing than cutting $2 trillion in a single year. Everything is done steps. No project or agenda goes from 0% to 100% overnight. But people have to have everything now.

People need to start appreciating steps in the right direction instead of constantly bitching that it's never good enough.
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
38089 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:16 am to
quote:

I don't think you can get there without doing something with SS, Medicare and Medicaid, and no one wants to touch that.


I don't think anyone truly knows what the numbers are until the DOGE audits throughout each and every department of the United States government is complete.

I am strongly convinced the entire house of cards needs to fall down before we see relief. Eliminating the FED is going to be a HUGE step in the right direction.
Posted by caliegeaux
Member since Aug 2004
12778 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:21 am to
quote:


quote:
Cheap energy + Tariffs to offset income tax is a worth the exercise.

the math doesn't work and our SOL and economic standing will decline.


whelp, i was on the fence, but after reading this, i'm 100% FOR. (ps i wasn't really on the fence.........drill baby drill)
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37623 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:50 am to
Leases do not necessarily equal drilling or production. The companies pay at an auction type of setting for the rights to drill if economically feasible
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
40429 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:51 am to
Reduce taxes and spending and we won’t have tohave Oil pay for it.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
31417 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:52 am to
Every CITIZEN that is the age of majority of the United States should get royalyies from the production from Public lands. If you pay taxes the royalties would go to you directly to you. If you are on the dole it offsets whatever Governemnt benefits you recieve. States should do the same thing.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29244 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:49 am to
quote:

I can't continue spending $70,000 a year in taxes.


That's it?

What bad decisions did you make in life to make you a poor?
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29244 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:51 am to
I think Alaska does something like that with royalties from production on their state lands.
Posted by caliegeaux
Member since Aug 2004
12778 posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Leases do not necessarily equal drilling or production. The companies pay at an auction type of setting for the rights to drill if economically feasible


no kidding.........permitting drives that bus. but not having lease sales for almost 2 years doesn't give them much new exploration either. we used to have 2 per year. thankfully we have 1 on the books now, and going to be 2 per year again.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram