Started By
Message
locked post

"Rent is Theft" - a new communist meme

Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:00 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421771 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:00 pm
and when i say communist, i mean the actual commies of today . more liberal posters on here are seen by many as legit leftists, but the real leftists see our humble liberal posting clique as conservatives. the real commies want to completely destroy your way of life and take all of your property, remember that when you're insulting fellow posters who are not anywhere close to this level

this is one of my favorite leftist/communist memes because you can tell it hits home for many of them. urban centers, especially on the coast, are legit expensive as frick to live in these days. the scarcity of land, the scarcity of acceptable cities, liberal zoning, oppressive governments, etc dictate a high cost for living in these areas. when you flood these (expensive) areas with lots of left-minded kids with lower earning potential, conflict will emerge

we will start with the website Rent is Theft. About Rent is Theft

quote:

A free magazine dedicated to proposing radical alternatives to the mainstream discourse regarding gentrification and housing in general.


with such amazing articles as Beyon the Illusion of Democracy.

quote:

For the members of BSolid that went inside, the evening was not so enjoyable. What was billed as a “round-table discussion” was actually more of a walking tour of the dizzying labyrinth that is the mainstream political process. Participants were invited to give their opinions on various proposals for Bushwick in the form of stickers and post-its on poster board. Many of the proposals were vague and contradictory. What struck us was how the conversation had been framed in favor of so-called “development” without an alternative. The topics had already been predefined prior to residents attending, thus our “feedback” was limited to the patronizing activity of sticking post-it notes around to indicate our approval.


can't properly contribute to the political process? DESTROY IT

quote:

Though all of this “unity” and “compromise”, one must ask: Why do we have to negotiate with the real-estate moguls destroying our neighborhood? Shouldn’t it be they who are negotiating with us? It is our neighborhood after all. And if we decide we don’t want them here, why is it that we can’t walk away from the negotiations? In a truly participatory process, we would have the option of saying “no”, and stave off the onslaught of condo infestation. But in this process, to walk away would be to ensure our displacement. This process was not designed to regulate real estate capital, it was designed to regulate us.


quote:

We have another vision for Bushwick. We don’t see “development” as an inherently good thing. All the dog parks in the world won’t mean anything if you can’t afford to live anywhere near them. Furthermore, we don’t believe that nice things should only be enjoyed by the rich. Why should seeing a newly paved road, or a fresh new park, or a brand new bar, or hearing the words “community investment” fill us with such anxiety? It’s because we know these things aren’t built for us. They’re built for the yuppies that will replace us once we’ve been evicted. BSolid believes that we should be able to have a beautiful neighborhood without the fear that we won’t be able to afford our rent.

They want us to sit idly by as “community leaders” and “community organizations” sell-out our neighborhood to the developers, but BSolid is committed to fighting the onslaught of gentrification and committed to never selling out, and never compromising with false friends for the sake of “unity”. We are the only group who has vocally come forward to say “no” to the developments at Rheingold, with or without its deceptive promises of “affordable housing”, and we will be unwavering in our determination to stop the development.


an ancom page i follow on FB recently posted this meme



it was filled with enlightening discussions, such as:

quote:

quote:

Property is theft.


quote:

But what if it's something I create?


quote:

what was it made from ?

and how does it adhere to you?


quote:

Property isn't theft, but hoarding is definitely violence. You already have a phone, unnecessarily having 2 would be hoarding. BS dismissed.


quote:

Property is theft because it inherently induces privation.



quote:

The only way rent isn't theft is if it is a reasonable cost for services provided.

So, if every month you pay into an escrow account. Then, if the building needs a new roof, or a landscaper needs to be paid, or pest abatement. If the money is used only to maintain and improve the property, and not to create wealth for a landlord, then it is not theft.


quote:

Correct Ortiz no one is owed anything by anyone. But if you use the government to secure your absentee property and charge a fee for it's use to those who are legally denied finding their own way in life you are committing theft.




many of these pages are legit subtle trolls, and this one may be, but these comments are not
Posted by starsandstripes
Georgia
Member since Nov 2017
11897 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:01 pm to
I invite them to begin their campaign of violence.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84947 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:02 pm to
Taxation is theft.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421771 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Taxation is theft.

certainly what they're going for
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32642 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:03 pm to
Lol WTF is “absentee property”?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421771 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:04 pm to
property you don't actively live in

so even if you own an apartment and live in one, all the other apartments are "absentee"

see: hoarding is violence
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32642 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:05 pm to
So when I park my car at the store, it’s absentee property and subject to confiscation/reappropriation?

You know what, don’t answer SFP. These people are legit nutty or a fabulous troll
Posted by wareaglepete
Lumon Industries
Member since Dec 2012
10936 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:05 pm to
You know they could move. Pretty sure there are Starbucks locations in Middle America where they could work, don't have to be in LA, NY, or Miami.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94877 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:08 pm to
These fricktards probably don’t realize that “tenant friendly” policies like rent control, section 8, set asides, etc, pretty much limit the available housing pool.

Because why would you build new housing in Manhattan or San Francisco if you couldn’t charge market value or had to take welfare scum in the same building as luxury apartments / condos?
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:08 pm to
I literally fricking abhor Communists. They are truly the lowest of the fricking low.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421771 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:08 pm to
leads to an interesting question

are all Sonics without active fighting absentee properties, or does their putative status as the go to location for internet-based fights make them technically occupied at all times in perpetuity?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94877 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:09 pm to
Ones without active fighting are just waiting for the employees to go on break and start shooting at each other.
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32652 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

I literally fricking abhor Communists. They are truly the lowest of the fricking low.
They are a toxic, self-loathing immoral group from my experience.
Posted by celltech1981
Member since Jul 2014
8139 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:21 pm to
There are libertarian socialists who are all about this movement.
Posted by tigrbabe08
Member since Apr 2017
219 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:21 pm to
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32652 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

are all Sonics without active fighting absentee properties, or does their putative status as the go to location for internet-based fights make them technically occupied at all times in perpetuity?
I think the communist answer would be that since the Sonics are used by multiple parties to fight then they are reserved/occupied in perpetuity.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112417 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:23 pm to
Kroger's is theft.
Would I pay for my groceries if I could have them for free? Nope.
So, why do I pay for my groceries?
Because they make me give them money. It's theft.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70097 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

A free magazine dedicated to proposing radical alternatives to the mainstream discourse regarding gentrification and housing in general.


I had my first real life "run in" of sorts with the attitude that gentrification is evil. I was reading about a new community development plan for some neighborhoods here in St Louis that aren't too far from my own.

I read the whole proposal that's going through that was two years in the making and put together by several neighborhood improvement organizations. It all looks like good stuff, I'm excited about it. And there are even some things they can do to jumpstart improvements that don't cost a ton of money.

But as I was reading it, I got to the SWOT analysis. I figured I'd see what they see as the strengths of the area and especially how realistic they were about the threats to the area.

Listed in the threats:
- Continued disinvestment
- Potential gentrification of the area.

fricking insane. They were listed right there one after the other. With no apparent regard for the fact that they are complete opposites.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48295 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

So, if every month you pay into an escrow account. Then, if the building needs a new roof, or a landscaper needs to be paid, or pest abatement. If the money is used only to maintain and improve the property, and not to create wealth for a landlord, then it is not theft.


And who do they suppose will build these buildings for nothing?
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48272 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

I invite them to begin their campaign of violence.


Revolutionary Violence, at this point in time, IMHO, is premature. The Left should continue forward on the Long March, as demonstrated by Mao's own Long March.

The Left now control our pop culture, our education, our mass media and our FedGov. Yes, I know, many will retort: "FedGov &^% dumbass the GOP have both Congress and the WH" but look closely -- have the GOP really won? They fight Trump with more gusto then they fight the Left.

Trump is temporary -- probably 4, and maybe 8 years. After that Leftist Progress continues to consolidate political power and indoctrinate the masses, especially youth.

Revolutionary Physical Violence is really one of the final solutions to the problem of political dissent -- it is a tool to make an example of dissidents only after political power is totally consolidated into a totalitarian entity.

There are other forms of revolutionary "violence" against political enemies, and it is being waged right now against Trump, his family and all of his associates, allies and employees. There's a massive effort to destroy and bankrupt all of them -- to make examples of them.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram