- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Remember when just the swing states simultaneously went to take a smoke break in 2020?
Posted on 12/17/22 at 9:02 pm to doubleb
Posted on 12/17/22 at 9:02 pm to doubleb
all 7 million of the popular vote count difference came from NY and CA
less than 40,000 votes cast for Trump instead of Biden in 4 states would have turned the election for Trump
less than 40,000 votes cast for Trump instead of Biden in 4 states would have turned the election for Trump
This post was edited on 12/17/22 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 12/17/22 at 9:08 pm to Hooligan's Ghost
quote:
all 7 million of the popular vote count difference came from NY and CA less than 40,000 votes cast for Trump instead of Biden in 4 states would have turned the election for Trump
I believe that, but many here act as if Biden received more than 7 million fraudulent votes.
I also know several 100,000 votes in a handful of states could swing the election; thus there was no real reason to gun up 7 million votes fir Biden.
The challenge I made was for someone that believes Biden couldn’t beat Trump by seven million votes is to show from which states the fraudulent votes came from.
Posted on 12/17/22 at 9:22 pm to the808bass
quote:
Milwaukee County’s registered voters for the 2022 elections went down by 50,000 versus the 2020 elections.
quote:
A review of data by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution found that the share of Georgians who registered through the state Department of Driver Services fell from 79% in 2020 to 39% last year.
Pretty smart to register them when they renew their DL. Half of them won't vote and don't care who mails in their ballot.
Posted on 12/17/22 at 9:33 pm to doubleb
less than 40,000 votes cumulative in 4 states
Posted on 12/17/22 at 10:12 pm to Hooligan's Ghost
quote:
less than 40,000 votes cumulative in 4 states
So less than 50K changes everything.
Posted on 12/17/22 at 10:41 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
you should be asking why a country as advanced as the US could EVER have differences of voter registration estimates > 40 MILLION for a single election.
Wait a minute. Your post I responded to was discussing the number of voter registrations Biden added between 2018 and 2020.
I pointed out in my last post that you had cherry-picked your facts. Instead of responding to what I posted, you completely changed the subject.
You switched from discussing the number of added registrations to complaining about the difference in voting registration estimates. You also added a criticism of me for not wondering about the difference in voting registration estimates- something that had not even been discussed before .
You will do anything to keep from admitting you were wrong just like the crap you tried to pull here. First, you change the subject, and then you inject a bogus attack on me.
This kind of horseshite is not an aberration. It's your general MO.
You're a disingenuous fraud.
Posted on 12/17/22 at 10:57 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Tell the board about Russia, Russia, Russia.
To summarize one example, Trump had a Russian lobbyist as his campaign manager. He asked the Russians to hack the Democrats' emails. Then he had another campaign member call and arrange for the emails to be released, 45 minutes after the Access Hollywood audio was released.
Posted on 12/18/22 at 1:42 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
I am one of the most intelligent people you have ever talked to - and I am CERTAIN beyond any doubt whatever that the election was stolen
Oxymoron.
Posted on 12/18/22 at 3:52 am to doubleb
150 of them came from just one single hotel/flop house in Ohio.
From NPR, known bastion of conservatives
Iron clad proof of who you are and where you live - any four numbers between 0-9. What a fricking tragic joke this has become.
We're nearly there, maximum clown world!
quote:
Voting by mail is a better option for many people experiencing homelessness because it allows them to circumvent requirements for government documents
From NPR, known bastion of conservatives
quote:
Many states, including Ohio, require government identification for in-person voting, Leith says, and not all homeless people have something that qualifies.
Leith says voter guides distributed by her organization recommend using the last four digits of a Social Security number as identification.
Iron clad proof of who you are and where you live - any four numbers between 0-9. What a fricking tragic joke this has become.
We're nearly there, maximum clown world!
This post was edited on 12/18/22 at 7:10 am
Posted on 12/18/22 at 5:12 am to texridder
quote:Tex, there are registered voter estimates that vary by 40 million FOR THE SAME YEAR!
Wait a minute. Your post I responded to was discussing the number of voter registrations Biden added between 2018 and 2020.
I pointed out in my last post that you had cherry-picked your facts.
Do you get that?
Because that is the point.
So for someone to contend they know how many new voters registered between 2018 and 2020 when we don't even know within a 40 MILLION variance how many voters were registered in 2020, is ludicrous.
That was/is the point.
I linked the data for you.
You want to compare the delta in one dataset, which I did. But you don't want to extrapolate that data across datasets which is fine, I guess.
The problem is the derived 2018-2020 delta is no more accurate than data itself. The data itself varies by 40 MILLION registered votes in 2020 alone!
So it seems damn reasonable to compare datasets, link those datasets as I did, and provide the implied minimal to max range possibilities in 2018-2020 RV numbers. You seem to have a burr up your arse about it. Tough!
Posted on 12/18/22 at 5:25 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The data itself varies by 40 MILLION registered votes in 2020 alone!
There is no reasonable assurance that the 'one person, one vote' Constitutional principle can be adhered to in a system where mail in ballots flood the zone based on a list of names that no one knows is accurate.
Posted on 12/18/22 at 5:26 am to texridder
quote:When was Trump's defensive briefing on this with the FBI?
To summarize one example, Trump had a Russian lobbyist as his campaign manager.
Ah ... yes ... I remember now.
There was no defensive briefing by the FBI.
Despite that, what did Trump do?
Ah ... yes ... I remember now.
He fired Manafort before the Fall Campaign even began.
quote:In public at a presser, he threw out his arms laughing and said "Hey Vlad, they say you've got Hillary's emails. Release 'em. Release 'em all. Thanks Vlad."
He asked the Russians to hack the Democrats' emails
To imply Trump was serious is bizarre.
Posted on 12/18/22 at 12:10 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
based on a list of names that no one knows is accurate.
We know, in fact, that the lists are not accurate.
Posted on 12/18/22 at 12:12 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Half of them won't vote and don't care who mails in their ballot.
We all know this is what is happening. Some people can say it out loud. Others cannot.
Posted on 12/18/22 at 2:02 pm to FlexDawg
81 million votes for a pederast who can't string three words together and has utterly failed at every other presidential run he's made. Not to mention was responsible for every policy degenerates spent half of 2020 burning cities over...
This post was edited on 12/18/22 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 12/18/22 at 11:25 pm to doubleb
The only thing more troubling than a stolen election is if the election was not stolen. If 81M actually voted for Biden then it’s done, it’s over, stick a fork in western civilization. There’s nothing left to fight for and look to the third world as our future.
Posted on 12/18/22 at 11:46 pm to texridder
quote:
Russia, Russia, Russia.

It’s real to me, dammit!!!!
Posted on 12/19/22 at 11:19 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
dp
This post was edited on 12/19/22 at 11:22 pm
Posted on 12/19/22 at 11:20 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:What does Trump getting a defensive briefing have to do with what I posted?
There was no defensive briefing by the FBI.
The answer is... nothing. You just post irrelevant crap like that because you that's all you got. And of course you are going to respond to that by (convolutedly) explaining how it was obviously relevant and that I'm just not sharp enough to catch the (non) connection you dreamed up.
That's just your go-to horseshite response. Time after time.
quote:That's not what he said. He said the following, and he wasn't smiling:
In public at a presser, he threw out his arms laughing and said "Hey Vlad, they say you've got Hillary's emails. Release 'em. Release 'em all. Thanks Vlad."
quote:
"Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press,"
quote:To suggest he wasn't serious is ignorant. Watch the rest of the press conference where Trump tries to walk it back by saying he doesn't know if it's Russia who has the emails. "I don't know who it is. If it is Russia..." "It's probably China," he blurted out.
To imply Trump was serious is bizarre.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 4:10 am to texridder
quote:Goodness Tex, I assumed as you brought it up, you'd have some rudimentary knowledge about the topic.
What does Trump getting a defensive briefing have to do with what I posted?
You referred to Trump's Campaign Manager. The man's name was Paul Manafort. You called him a "Russian lobbyist." Of course Manafort's connections were actually to Ukraine, like Hunter Biden's. But, be that as it may, Manafort did not divulge those foreign connections to Trump, and they had no basis whatsoever in Trump's decision to bring Manafort on.
Manafort was hired because Ted Cruz was getting beaten at the polls, but outmaneuvering the Trump Campaign with procedural technicalities behind the scenes. Cruz was attempting to manipulate GOP Convention delegates and policies. Manafort arrived with the experience and organizational expertise to shut Cruz down, and he did, very effectively.
In June, Jared Kushner who'd been the main force behind Manafort's hire, became suspicious of PM after Manafort arranged an odd, ill-conceived meeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya, Kushner, and DJTjr.
JK began poking around and by August he'd uncovered various activities Manafort had hidden from the campaign team. Those activities included some of his Ukrainian work. JK passed this on to Sessions and Trump. Trump confronted Manafort, and fired him.
So that's the Manafort story in a nutshell.
---
But what is missing in that whole sequence?
What is missing is a routine heads-up from the FBI.
That 'heads-up' is known as a "Defensive Briefing." It serves purpose to warn politicians and nominees of FBI/IC concerns regarding certain information, contacts, etc.
According to Comey, the FBI was wringing its hands over Manafort's foreign dalliances prior to the Veselnitskaya meeting. Yet, there was no STANDARD FBI DEFENSIVE BRIEFING which is ROUTINELY PROVIDED to a party front-runner in a situation like that.
To the contrary, instead of briefing Trump as they should have done, Comey and the FBI kept the information to itself. They chose instead to work cooperatively with the HRC Campaign and w/ Christopher Steele to concoct a bizarre series of fictional claims targeting Trump.
Given a routine, standard, normal, typical run-of-the-mill defensive briefing when the FBI first registered concerns, Trump could/would have acted on Manafort much earlier, and none of this would have even happened.
Instead, even to this day, someone like yourself is bamboozled into attaching RussiaRussiaRussia to Trump through the Manafort association.
So that's "what Trump getting a defensive briefing had to do with what you posted."
quote:Interesting premise.
Trump tries to walk it back by saying he doesn't know if it's Russia who has the emails. "I don't know who it is. If it is Russia..." "It's probably China," he blurted out.
You say he "tried to walk it back"?
So who did have "those emails"?
Russia? China?
Indeed, which emails are we even referencing?
Because Hillary's cybersecurity was so horrible there were at least three major breaches. Remember?
(1) The John Podesta Phishing Breach: Podesta unbelievably kept years of confidential correspondence on a fricking Google Server! Brilliant! Then even more unbelievably, he was stupid enough fall for a Junior High School level Phish. All of his correspondences were exposed/published.
(2) Hillary's Home Network Wireless Server: While she was Secretary of State Hillary broke numerous national security protocols, but the most egregious was maintaining top-secret information on an open broadcast home network. Her imbecilic negligence allowed any country on the planet with even rudimentary cyber expertise to access some of the Obama Administration's most sensitive materials. It was around that time that several of our spy networks were coincidentally decimated. Later the FBI found out HRC transferred much/all of that info to another residential computer which was routinely accessed by a convicted pedophile. Remember?
3) The DNC "Hack": Actually not a "hack" at all. Just a simple download of information to a thumbdrive which was subsequently provided to wikileaks. Interestingly, the FBI is still lying about the source of the DNC wikileaks data, and perhaps lying about the Seth Rich connection to it. There may have been additional external DNC hacks/access-attempts by outside players. But those were not the source of wikileaks materials. The FBI knows that.
My recollection is Trump's comments referred to #2.
So with regard to "walking it back," neither he, nor you, nor anyone actually knows who had/has information from Hillary's kitchen pantry server network. It could be Russia. It could be China. It could be NoKo. It could be Britain, France, Germany, etc. It likely is all of the above. It's a virtual certainty several countries, allies and enemies, acquired everything that network contained, and whoever has it ... well, they ain't talking.
This post was edited on 12/20/22 at 4:50 am
Popular
Back to top
