Started By
Message

re: Remember my thread last week telling y’all what was in redacted Flynn memo?

Posted on 12/13/18 at 1:28 pm to
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

last sentence, baw.

Already had ETAd
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 1:28 pm to
Not while president baw

If he actually said that baw

Maybe he was lying when he said it baw

What to do about lying about lying baw
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
117330 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 1:28 pm to
If this is true - it would make sense why the
Media was trying to drum up outrage over that fat Kelloggi guy
Posted by Dave England
Member since Apr 2013
5107 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

How dumb does Mueller think we are?


I think the members of this board are more likely to split their pants after eating too much at the office XXXmas party than split the atom.

If I had to put a %age with the number of people here who have "attended college" on their resume as opposed to "graduated" , I'd feel pretty comfortable saying about 95%.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
40394 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
117330 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 1:32 pm to
Please post your resume, thank you.
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
5984 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 1:40 pm to
gotcha it's okay to lie about affairs and then paying them to keep quite about it as long as it's not under oath.. sorry all of these rules can be confusing.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 1:43 pm to
quote:


gotcha it's okay to lie about affairs and then paying them to keep quite about it as long as it's not under oath..


Yes.

It is.

And frankly, 100% of liberals think it is too.
Posted by Dave England
Member since Apr 2013
5107 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Please post your resume, thank you.


since you asked so nicely:

Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
117330 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 1:56 pm to
Who did you vote for in 2016?
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

If I had to put a %age with the number of people here who have "attended college" on their resume as opposed to "graduated" , I'd feel pretty comfortable saying about 95%.


ahhh, we have a twitter aficionado on here.

Thanks for playing

Posted by Dave England
Member since Apr 2013
5107 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 2:03 pm to
I wrote in "NIH" for President.

Posted by Dave England
Member since Apr 2013
5107 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

aficionado


I'd be stunned if you actually knew what this meant.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
88188 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

gotcha it's okay to lie about affairs and then paying them to keep quite about it as long as it's not under oath


Basically
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
10610 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 2:11 pm to
Fair enough, my surly fellow.

I suppose Mueller will likely have to settle for false written responses.

(I know, I know. We have to wait...)
Posted by CheniereTiger108
Member since Jul 2014
1650 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

don't know that they preferred Trump in the same way that the Russians did, but it seems they tried to buy him. Doesn't he seem like the sort of guy who can be bought?


No. In fact, that’s a large reason why Dems and establishment Republicans despise him and want him gone. Because he is not beholden to ANYONE and he can’t be controlled.

And to add to that, before running for President, he was on the opposite side of that coin. He donated funds - or “bought” influence from politicians. So he knows the game they’re playing better than they do.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Doesn't he seem like the sort of guy who can be bought?
As opposed to whom exactly?
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
21173 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 2:40 pm to
Well, I don't know why they have to continue. They kinda might have trump on a crime if it is proven he used funds (even personal) in the interest of his campaign and then did not report it when he paid off the dumpsters he was banging before his run. I mean don't they have a tape of him saying to pay cash?


That he tried to cover it up and hide it without reporting is what makes it criminal and not just a campaign violation subject to a fine right?
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
117330 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 2:41 pm to
Did you vote for Hillary?
This post was edited on 12/13/18 at 2:42 pm
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 2:45 pm to
Not sure what's going on with all this but Vin Weber is swamp that hated Trump

quote:

Weber was a member of the now defunct Project for the New American Century (PNAC) and was one of the signers of the PNAC Letter[4] sent to US President Bill Clinton on January 26, 1998, advocating "the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime from power", along with Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and 29 other notable Republicans.[5] Weber opened and managed the Washington, D.C. branch of lobbying firm Clark & Weinstock. In 2006, home mortgage giant Freddie Mac paid Weber $360,297 to lobby on its behalf to fend off meaningful regulation in the lead-up to the subprime mortgage crisis.[6] Weber also lobbied for Gazprom, Russia's state-owned natural gas company


quote:

Weber was one of the Republicans who turned against the surprise Donald Trump candidacy, telling CNBC on August 3, 2016, "I can't imagine I'd remain a Republican if he becomes president
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram