15
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Remember kids, there is no such thing as lawfare…
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:59 am
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:59 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Democrats and Rep. AOC say they have SO MANY lawfare investigations to launch against Donald Trump's allies, she doesn't even know where to start
"There are so many CRIMINALS in this administration, it's hard to figure out the order of operations! There will be many, many, many investigations, I imagine many subpoenas." ??
Misreading their midterm win JUST AS EXPECTED
2026 was "affordability" and "Iran war" for them, now it's "LAWYER UP" and "INVESTIGATE" as their number one priority
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:04 am to Placekicker
For sure R Congress will be immune from D investigation and subpoenas.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:05 am to Placekicker
quote:
Democrats and Rep. AOC say they have SO MANY lawfare investigations to launch against Donald Trump's allies, she doesn't even know where to start
If I was Trump, each and every time the Democrats brought forward a name or person to "investigate" with their lawfare, I would immediately issue a pardon for that individual. Do it one at a time, every time the Dems issue a subpoena or "investigation". He can do this for the next two years.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:07 am to Placekicker
This is one of the primary plays in the color revolution playbook.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:07 am to BFIV
Go for it Dems - my nephew works in the administration and they have been shredding docs for months they knew the midterms would be a slaughter.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:08 am to Placekicker
@ SFP + BoosietheracistPosted on 11/11/26 at 9:08 am to Placekicker
I’d like to see wiles go down, her daughter made a lot of money.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:11 am to Placekicker
2 years of getting nothing done
Yay
Yay
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:14 am to Placekicker
"Lawfare isn't real"
~Slippin' Jimmy
~Slippin' Jimmy
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:21 am to Placekicker
These people are GIDDY right now. The Democrats are going to play themselves right out of the White House in 2028 over the next 2 years. They have no plan on anything. They are going to spend all of their time on the revenge tour and by the time we hit the election cycle in 2028 they're going to be still standing there, probably even a little more left than they are today, with absolutely nothing to hang their hat on.
However, I never underestimate the Republican's ability to divide themselves and frick up everything so there's that.
However, I never underestimate the Republican's ability to divide themselves and frick up everything so there's that.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:22 am to SDVTiger
quote:
@ SFP
Where did I ever say the DEMs wouldn't investigate possible corruption with Trump's inner circle and family?
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:23 am to hogcard1964
quote:
"Lawfare isn't real"
~Slippin' Jimmy
If these investigations expose illegality or corruption, are they "lawfare"?
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Where did I ever say the DEMs wouldn't investigate possible corruption with Trump's inner circle and family?
How big of a chubb do you get at the thought of Trump and/or his kids getting arrested? Be honest.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:27 am to SlowFlowPro
You have a half a million posts and expect that anyone calling out your BS to have some encyclopedic knowledge of it. Tolstoy would blush had he written novels as long as your ramblings on this site.
And you have repeatedly made the argument that lawfare was not a thing, but here you obfuscate by pivoting that you never said Trump et. al, wouldn't be a target. Which was not the argument of the OP.
Don't be exceptionally obtuse.
And you have repeatedly made the argument that lawfare was not a thing, but here you obfuscate by pivoting that you never said Trump et. al, wouldn't be a target. Which was not the argument of the OP.
Don't be exceptionally obtuse.
This post was edited on 11/11/26 at 9:29 am
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:27 am to Placekicker
6 pages of Sir Jacob of House Calcasieu not addressing the meat of the story and arguing the definition of the term lawfare.
It's all very tiring.
It's all very tiring.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If these investigations expose illegality or corruption, are they "lawfare"?
Was investigating jack Smith lawfare in your opinion?
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If these investigations expose illegality or corruption, are they "lawfare"?
You are the definition of hypocrite. When the shoe is on the other foot, you cry lawfare. But now, you waffle on the definition because you approve on who is being targeted.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:31 am to Placekicker
quote:
"There are so many CRIMINALS in this administration, it's hard to figure out the order of operations! There will be many, many, many investigations, I imagine many subpoenas."
If no crimes were committed, we'll just imagine some.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If these investigations expose illegality or corruption, are they "lawfare"?
Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 9:32 am to Placekicker
Hunted.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News