Started By
Message

re: Remember gold star mom Tina Peters is sitting in prison today because of corrupt Dems

Posted on 5/26/25 at 8:20 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466157 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

They get nervous about protecting that election.

Lindell had that data and could show nothing. It was a huge L for him, as basically every exhibition was. Hence why he still owes someone $5M.

Lindell taking an L is a completely separate topic from discussing what Tina Peters did.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
39605 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 7:41 am to
quote:

Lindell taking an L is a completely separate topic from discussing what Tina Peters did.


I didn’t bring him into this discussion.

We are talking about Tina.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466157 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 7:46 am to
quote:

I didn’t bring him into this discussion.

He's specifically tied to this discussion and your assertion that people are scared to analyze the election.

Lindell did have this data. It did not support his thesis. Why would anyone be scared of him taking another L promoting the conspiracy?

quote:

We are talking about Tina.

Tina illegally accessed and distributed the data to...Lindell
This post was edited on 5/27/25 at 7:47 am
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
8217 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 8:33 am to
quote:

SlowFlowPro


Somehow in your above the fray, unbiased position you always take the democrat side.

"Sure, we cheated, but if you try to prove it and can't you go to prison."

This shite is not going to hold forever.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466157 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Somehow in your above the fray, unbiased position you always take the democrat side.

This is not true, and what you're discussing (admittedly histrionic to the level of dishonesty) is a sampling error.

The ratio of Dems to non-Dems on here is what? 500:1? 1000:1?

MAGA says a lot of stupid shite, and since their population is so overwhelming on here, there is much more to correct. Gone are the days of a real Dem-Left population on here where there was any real posts of substance to reply/correct. Now what you get are MAGA bringing curated stories from the echo chamber to create "the Left" from which they reply.

People also don't notice when I call out DEMs/Leftists b/c it's non-controversial. A great, recent example is the MN judge. However, you still had the emotional-dishonest types who projected a straw man that I defended the judge....because they don't live in a reality based in truth.

quote:

"Sure, we cheated, but if you try to prove it and can't you go to prison."

Not an accurate description of the situation at all, but, as I pointed above, the dishonesty is primarily from your tribe these days.

quote:

This shite is not going to hold forever.

If the truth fails and succumbs to your tribe's silliness, we have a lot to worry about moving forward.
This post was edited on 5/27/25 at 8:47 am
Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
3234 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Sure, we cheated, but if you try to prove it and can't you go to prison

5 years later, maga is still spinning their wheels in the same sport regarding trump's baseless claims of a stolen 2020 election. meanwhile, tina peters disabled security cameras and let an unauthorized entity copy info from voting machines using a fraudulent id, which was then shared with the likes of mike lindell
not one thing about the info she stole indicated voter fraud. unfortunately for her, it was indicative of several criminal acts
it would be comical if it wasn't so pathetically sad
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466157 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 9:02 am to
quote:

not one thing about the info she stole indicated voter fraud


And therein lies the true tragedy for Tina Peters, ultimately.

She got caught up in charlatan BS and thought she'd be some hero, but ultimately the data she smuggled to Lindell was worthless for the "Stop the Steal" movement.

That's why the "what are they scared of?" memes are super silly.
Posted by HangmanPage1
Wild West
Member since Aug 2021
2030 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 9:36 am to
SFP is a clown. Also the 2020 election wasn’t stolen. Under the guise of Covid, the Dems pushed for mail in voting, to cheat? No. To get every bum and leech to vote? Yes. 2020 showed us that not everyone should vote. Funny that when we went back to get off your arse and go vote, numbers went down.

The problem in our country is a large segment of the population are complete morons. Are they on both sides, yes. However one side has morons that promote nationalism and more traditional values. The other side doesn’t.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
23787 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 9:53 am to
quote:

We are a separate sovereign.”


Lincoln disagreed.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
53758 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Says some voting machines were compromised when she was attempting to check for voter fraud with some other folks.

Did she do something calculated there or did they get her for just having folks around the machines when they weren’t supposed to be?


I believe she gave confidential data to a third party who had no authorization to possess the data, without proper authorization, and prior to that illegally accessed the database to download/transfer the data.

This was a pretty clear cut case IIRC.



If I recall Ms Peters conversation with Steve Bannon on his War Room show, Ms Peters said she was trying to get an another backup from the machines before the voting machine vendor wiped the original database. I think Ms Peters said she didn't trust the backup that had been given to the state/precinct officials was safe from tampering so she wanted another for comparison purposes.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466157 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Ms Peters said she was trying to get an another backup from the machines before the voting machine vendor wiped the original database.

She's clearly lying.

If this was solely about protecting the data, why did she create a scheme to literally give that backup away to an agent of Mike Lindell?

quote:

I think Ms Peters said she didn't trust the backup that had been given to the state/precinct officials was safe from tampering so she wanted another for comparison purposes.

After she gave the illegally-obtained data to an unauthorized third party, she had no backups to preserve. If she was making this backup for preservation purposes, why didn't she, you know, keep one?

This question ignores her scheme, the fraud, and the lack of following proper protocols, chain of custody, etc.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
39605 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

This question ignores her scheme,


What was her scheme?
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
53758 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

This question ignores her scheme,


What was her scheme?


Exactly, what did she have to gain? Thank you.
Posted by The Squonk
Member since Nov 2023
250 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 12:50 pm to
Wikipedia:
was born to an Ashkenazi Jewish family. His grandparents survived the Holocaust, and his mother, Estare, was born in the Buchenwald concentration camp in 1945.
Posted by PoppedRiser
Member since May 2025
856 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

We know it won’t be Ashli Babbitt trying to break in to free her


Your frickass is the reason libs like you will be hanging on the street poles. Toxic little count you.
Posted by The Squonk
Member since Nov 2023
250 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Milk toast creep!


Sad
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466157 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

What was her scheme?


She led Woods on that he was being hired as an IT guy, which allowed her to create a badge for him that could access the data. This in itself was not protocol. However, the real scheme started when quickly took the badge back, and effectively told Wood he wasn't going to be hired. She then permitted an agent of Lindell to use Wood's badge to access the data (so it would be associated with Wood, not her or Lindell's guy), and permitted Lindell's agent to keep the data (while not keeping a backup copy herself).

Oh, and she also arranged for the cameras to be turned off while the impropriety was going on.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466157 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Exactly, what did she have to gain?


Notoriety in a movement created by charlatans. She thought she was crucial to proving "The Steal" and, as I pointed out, it's sad where she ended up listening to people like Lindell.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84490 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 1:41 pm to
Love how my response to this post:

quote:

Would be terrible if someone resorted to violence.


Drew these types of reactions:

quote:

Your frickass is the reason libs like you will be hanging on the street poles. Toxic little count you.


Mention Ashli Babbitt fricking around and finding out and the fishing shirt chucklefricks get



Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
2217 posts
Posted on 5/27/25 at 2:57 pm to
Wowww you are suck a disingenuous lying piece of shite.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram