Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Received this from Bill Cassidy just now.

Posted on 2/12/21 at 1:59 pm
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 1:59 pm
It was in response to my e-mail to him the other day which went something like, "Congratulations on ensuring I will never cast another vote for you after that vote." That's it.

In response, I got this canned horseshite...

February 12, 2021


Dear Mr.,

Thank you for writing in with your comments on the second impeachment trial of former President Trump. This is an important topic and I appreciate hearing from you.

The House of Representatives impeached Trump for the second time on January 13, 2021 with the charge of “inciting violence against the government of the United States.” On January 25, 2021, the House impeachment managers delivered the single article of impeachment to the United States Senate.

At issue, are the events that took place on January 6, 2021. As you are aware, rioters violently breached the halls of Congress in an attempt to disrupt the electoral vote certification and the peaceful transfer of power. This was wrong, seditious, and ultimately resulted in the deaths of multiple individuals.

There was a vote on the constitutionality of having a trial for a former president on February 9, 2021. I voted that it was constitutional. We heard arguments from both sides. The House Managers quoted the Constitution, conservative jurists, including the cofounder of the Federalist Society, Founding Fathers, the Federalist Papers, and different documents that influenced the writing of the Constitution. They made clear that it is constitutional. They did such a great job that the President’s lawyers got up and said that they did a great job and that they would change their strategy. They then spent two hours talking about everything but his issue, except for maybe five minutes. They effectively conceded their point. If you disagree with my vote and would like an explanation, I ask that you listen to the arguments presented by the House Managers and former President Trump’s lawyers. The House managers had much stronger constitutional arguments. The president’s team did not. This vote was not a prejudgment on the final vote to convict. I’ve also heard that there are some folks who think that I should put President Trump above the Constitution. That’s not Conservatism. That’s not Republicanism. And I reject it.

While I am strongly against the actions that took place on January 6, 2021, I will keep an open mind at the trial and look forward to hearing the arguments of both sides and getting answers. Just like the first impeachment trial, I will uphold my oath to be an impartial juror and vote based on the evidence presented. Everyone, even a former president, is entitled to a defense and to have all of the facts be heard. The vote on February 9, 2021 was not a prejudgment on the final vote to convict. Please know that I understand all points of view on this impeachment trial, even those that disagree with me.

I will continue to represent the views of my state and do so through hearing from constituents like you. Please continue to reach out, either by phone or by email, when you have another question or concern. You can reach my office in Washington DC at 202-224-5824 or submit an email at LINK .

Sincerely,

Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D.



Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95333 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:00 pm to
Senator Cassidy,

FOAD.

Signed,
Teke
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:02 pm to
Due to our tight fiscal situation, we regret to inform you we are still going to have to close your station. Good luck in Sherbune, John. And give your men my best. Sincerely, Governor frickhead.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
19442 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:03 pm to
Same here.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26206 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

In response, I got this canned horseshite...


Were you expecting anything other than a pre-written response? Pretty foolish if so.
Posted by MorningWood
On the coast of North Mexico
Member since May 2009
2668 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:10 pm to
He or the correct member of his staff have yet to return the voicemail I left him.
Posted by danny d lsu
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2007
1542 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:11 pm to
Received the exact same email.
Posted by M. A. Ryland
silver spring, MD
Member since Dec 2005
2050 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:12 pm to
That actually is a pretty reasonable response letter...
You have to agree that the question of whether it is constitutional to impeach a President after he has left office is independent of the question of whether this President did anything worthy of impeachment.
Posted by Kattail
Member since Aug 2020
3327 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:13 pm to
I received the same letter
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26206 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

You have to agree that the question of whether it is constitutional to impeach a President after he has left office is independent of the question of whether this President did anything worthy of impeachment.


You must not have been reading the threads on these topics this week. The poli board is cognitively incapable of separating the two issues.
Posted by Patato Salad
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2009
620 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

In response, I got this canned horseshite...


First time writing your congressman, huh?
Posted by Nicky Parrish
Member since Apr 2016
7098 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:15 pm to
Mother should have named him Dick
Posted by DotBling
Member since Oct 2019
2911 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

You must not have been reading the threads on these topics this week. The poli board is cognitively incapable of separating the two issues.


Ok, then explain what he said in his interview. It was NOTHING like this. He said the Dems presented a good argument and Trump's team was unorganized, so he went with the good argument. I'll await your response.
Posted by caliegeaux
Member since Aug 2004
10145 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:17 pm to
Dearest Bill,

French kiss my a-hole.

Un-respectfully,
98% Of Louisiana
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26206 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Ok, then explain what he said in his interview. It was NOTHING like this. He said the Dems presented a good argument and Trump's team was unorganized, so he went with the good argument. I'll await your response.


His original justification was garbage and made him look like a low-IQ fool. No disagreements there.

That doesn’t mean that the two issues are not separate questions.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64655 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:18 pm to
While I am strongly against the actions that took place on January 6, 2021, I will keep an open mind at the trial and look forward to hearing the arguments of both sides and getting answers. Just like the first impeachment trial, I will uphold my oath to be an impartial juror

You low goal piece of worthlessness. There is no need for a jury and you have helped to continue the charade.
Posted by DotBling
Member since Oct 2019
2911 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

His original justification was garbage and made him look like a low-IQ fool.


That's the problem here.
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Communist USA
Member since Nov 2007
12115 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 2:21 pm to
I got the same chicken shite form letter. If he thinks this impeachment fiasco was remotely constitutional he needs to resign and go back to high school civics. I hope Cassidy was a better Doctor than he is a Senator. He sucks....
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram