re: Rand Paul demands Dems return money raised by "sexual predator" Bill Clinton

I thought Rand was a libertarian. His true stripes come out - just another right wing socialist who believes government belongs in the bedroom.

I await for his call for return of funds raised by David Vitter, Newt Gingrich, Dan Burton, and on and on.

quote:

---

I thought Rand was a libertarian. His true stripes come out - just another right wing socialist who believes government belongs in the bedroom.

I await for his call for return of funds raised by David Vitter, Newt Gingrich, Dan Burton, and on and on.

---

I hope this is a troll.

quote:

---

Women are waking up.
I'm proud to do my part.

---

quote:

---

Anyone else?

---

Juanita Broddrick

Oooops. One more time with feeling.

quote:

---

During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies

---

In Clintonese, I guess it all depends on what the "s" at the end of "advances" means. Broddrick never said he did it more than once.

quote:

---

So, should Hillary be "held responsible" for Bill's behavior? Hillary enables Bill. She is to Bill exactly what Dottie Sandusky was to Jerry Sandusky. She is certainly responsible for that. Now, one can attribute Hillary's actions to misguided devotion, or a desire to preserve the marriage at all costs, or something else. Regardless, her's was/is an active participation enabling her husband to sexually abuse women. Motivations aside, how ever one seeks to explain or justify her actions, they are not those of someone who can legitimately accuse others of a "War on Women".

---

Yep. And Rand knows this and has the cods to hang it around Hillary's neck. He's just getting an early start. Smart guy.

I've got an old image of Bill and Hillary playing volleyball back in college, but I can't copy/paste it. Hillary WAS hot. Damn shame they became liars and cheats. Oh well.

quote:

---

The problem is is Rand is attacking her spouse and not her.

---

No.

The "problem" is that Dems are hypocrites.
Rand is putting that hypocrisy on display and in perspective.

Has nothing to do with Bill. It has to do with folks willing to pal around and fund-raise with him, while tacitly OK'ing his predation -- past, present, future. Meanwhile, in perfect Alinsky form, those same hypocrites accuse the GOP of a "War on Women." If they try to have it both ways, Paul is going to slap them around a bit.

quote:

---

Once more the Feminist base will look at it and say he is afraid to take hilary on directly

---

This is about 2014.
Is Hillary running?

quote:

---

Same thing Bill said I guess they had the same idea of what constituted a sexual relationship

---

Yeah, I mean it's not like they had an opportunity to get their stories straight or anything.

You give a whole new meaning to the phrase "True Believer", dude. You really do.

Yep, NC; I knew you'd make it happen. You rock!

Be well.

I think conservatives have been pretty vocal about the lack of " women's rights" under Shari'a Law. Conservative women's groups were talking about groups like the Taliban and the mistreatment of Afghan women long before 9/11.

Your side however, has John Kerry spouting on about how its really a matter best left for each country to decide. Rather than use his voice to condemn Islam's repeated violations against women he reaffirmed their right to do so! I guess women's rights only really matter to lib-progs when they benefit.

Oh hey, thanks sooooooo much for giving me the opportunity to bring that up!
I wouldn't have thought to do it otherwise!