Started By
Message

re: Raffensperger’s Aide Jordan Fuchs Lied About President’s Phone Call to Far-Left WaPo

Posted on 8/27/23 at 7:02 pm to
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

What exactly is your basis for making that statement


Audio of the actual call.

What is your basis for claiming it's a lie, other than your being in a cult?
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
5528 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 7:24 pm to
At least you admit you're wrong.

quote:


I still don't see how this is a big deal


This from thebigmuffaletta should help

quote:

“I know we’ve been lying for several years now but what’s the big deal?”


And those lies were used to indict a former POTUS.

If you can't understand this, you're either being obtuse, & choosing to ignore it, or not very bright.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
9553 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

I don't understand why Trump doesn't release his official recording of the phone call and cut all this back and forth out.


You really don’t understand? …. never been in court?
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
9069 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

the honor of the GA Republican Party


They are "Principled Republicans"

I roll my fricking eyes every time I hear it.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2393 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

And those lies were used to indict a former POTUS.

If you can't understand this, you're either being obtuse, & choosing to ignore it, or not very bright.


Those "lies" were NOT used for any of this, which is why I don't see this as a big deal

The investigation originated due to the call to Raffensperger, not the call to Watson. No one lied about Raffensperger's call ((although the media misrepresents some of Trump's statements).

Willis had had the full recording of both calls for over 2 years, so how is an earlier misquote even an issue today?
This post was edited on 8/28/23 at 2:24 pm
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2393 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Now it's the accused investigating himself and he voted for Trump. Got it.


Raffensperger is not investigating himself. He has the SOS investigators looking into county election issues. Also the GBI making investigations.

quote:

Show you? You have dropbox videos destroyed, ballot images lost or destroyed, chain of custody issues, a bogus & errot-riddled RLA, sig verification in one county Cobb), refusal by one county (Coffee) to certify electronic recounts produced by Dominion machines, voting machines in violation of state code, highly questionable conflicts of interest between vendors, VSTL's, the EAC, & officials, VSTL's whose EAC accreditations had expired in 2017, etc...


Some of those claims you just made have merit, and some are just rumors, but here is your problem:

NONE of thise issues prove fraud. Opportunities to commit fraud, does not mean fraud necessarily occurred. If you show something suspicious about handling of ballots, that should be investigated...but unless you can show specific fraud occurred it's not very helpful.

And your complaints about the voting machines are just too bad. Based on the original lawsuit, the State went out and bought all new machines which produced paper ballots. The judge still had issues with the new machines, but it was too late to enjoin their use.

Still, even if it turns out those machines violated State law, those were the machines used, and it still doesn't prove anything fraudulent.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2393 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

“I know we’ve been lying for several years now but what’s the big deal?


"Several years?" The record was corrected in less than 3 months.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
21212 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Is not what happened on that call. Instead, Trump was trying to have Raffensperger manufacture 11,780 votes that they both knew didn't exist.

Hence the indictment.


No reasonable person who listens to the call can say without a reasonable doubt, Trump did anything wrong. YOU may interpret it that way due to your bias but nothing conclusive is spoken. Someone else can interpret it another way. This case is nothing more than another example of Dems are Marxist and evil.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56648 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

I agree the media lies about what Trump said in that call, but the recording speaks for itself. Pretty sure Fanni based her indictment on the actual tape and not media reports about the tape.


If you heard the call, then you know there was absolutely nothing illegal or even nefarious happening. So you’re admitting fanni’s prosecution strictly political. I mean it was what she ran for office on. “Get Trump”.
This post was edited on 8/28/23 at 3:47 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56648 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

They won't have to - the prosecution will play the call, because it's that damning.


I absolutely love when you act like you know anything about the law. Specifically, which statements do you claim are damning and illegal? So far I’ve only post lies about what is in the call.
This post was edited on 8/28/23 at 3:53 pm
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
18824 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Raffensperger voted for Trump


No way to verify that. I doubt he voted for Trump in 2020
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75014 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

If this comes out in court it just might take these GA Bush establishment Republicans down.

That's a feature, baw, not a bug.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
41939 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Trump was trying to have Raffensperger manufacture 11,780 votes that they both knew didn't exist.


This is a lie.

He referenced Rattfricker doing his job.

He did NOT ask him to manufacture votes.

You communazi goose-steppers lie profusely.
Posted by NCIS_76
Member since Jan 2021
5246 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Raffensperger voted for Trump



Evidence this happened?
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75014 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Trump was trying to have Raffensperger manufacture 11,780 votes that they both knew didn't exist.

Like those 12k votes were ginned up out of thin air in the first place, right?

Or do we have a distinct goose/gander inequity situation going on?
Posted by KAGTASTIC
Member since Feb 2022
7989 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

Audio of the actual call.

What is your basis for claiming it's a lie, other than your being in a cult?

So you are essentially going off your wanted interpretation. An interpretation thru your own evil cults colored glasses.
Posted by tigersmanager
Member since Jun 2010
9189 posts
Posted on 8/28/23 at 7:06 pm to
He's bias as hell but we should believe him lol
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram