- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for Dems re: Russia
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:01 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:01 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Natalia was working directly for the Russian government
Natalie isn't an agent of the Russian government. You know this.
You'd might have a point if she's an actual agent of a foreign government doing work for a foreign government but she wasn't.
1
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:03 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Cite the legal statute such a meeting violates.
52 U.S. Code § 30121 (a)(1)(A)
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:03 pm to atlgamecockman
quote:Evidence enough of WHAT? Before you embarrass yourself further, try to cite the law you think was broken.
The fact that Jr. took that meeting with Kushner and everyone else because they thought they were getting dirt on Hillary and were going to use it is evidence enough
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:03 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Natalie isn't an agent of the Russian government
Per our intelligence services and her own admonitions to Trump, she is (was?).
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:05 pm to NC_Tigah
see the post above yours for the relevant statute.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:05 pm to BamaAtl
If you keep shitposting you’ll get banned like WillieNelson
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:06 pm to BamaAtl
quote:You should read that.
52 U.S. Code § 30121 (a)(1)(A)
Then when you understand it, you should get very quiet and slip away.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:06 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Evidence enough of WHAT?
Conspiracy to defraud the US. Haven't you been paying attention AT ALL?!
Please stop showing your arse here, champ.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:06 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
Article from The Federalist noting connections between the Russians at the meeting and US intel, FBI and Clintons. Weird associations for Russian spies.
Smells like a setup
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:07 pm to Pussykat
It was a setup from the word go
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:07 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
why would his intel baws help manufacture the Steele dossier to assist the DNC and Hilldawg?
They didn't? Steele gathered intelligence himself from sources cultivated over a decades long career in Russian intelligence for MI6.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:07 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
Article from The Federalist
Does Russia still fund the Federalist?
And yet, you believe things they post?
Jesus, you're gullible...
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:08 pm to BamaAtl
quote:I assume you're referring to the meeting with Trump's son. It's difficult for me to know what you're referring to because you keep changing your accusations and you're never specific enough to know what you're referring to.
Are they false when Trump openly admits that this is what happened?
If my assumption is correct, what election help did the Russian government give Trump's son at the meeting? You wrote earlier that Trump illegally accepted election assistance from the Russian government. What was THE assistance that Trump accepted?
This is your last chance to answer that question or I'll know you can't answer it.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:09 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Per our intelligence services and her own admonitions to Trump, she is (was?).
She formally worked for a government entity in Moscow. That's not the same as an "agent of a foreign government".
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:10 pm to LSURussian
quote:
If my assumption is correct, what election help did the Russian government give Trump's son at the meeting? You wrote earlier that Trump illegally accepted election assistance from the Russian government. What was THE assistance that Trump accepted?
There doesn't have to be for taking the meeting is against the law in itself. You maga boys keep getting wrapped up in the "they didn't actually get anything!" thought. It does not matter.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:11 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
She formally worked for a government entity in Moscow. That's not the same as an "agent of a foreign government".
Do you listen to yourself?
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:11 pm to atlgamecockman
quote:
quote: why would his intel baws help manufacture the Steele dossier to assist the DNC and Hilldawg? They didn't? Steele gathered intelligence himself from sources cultivated over a decades long career in Russian intelligence for MI6.
Wrong dummy, I've listened to several reports that stated Steele met with Russian intelligence weeks prior to dossier being drafted in order to get the unsubstantiated BS.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:11 pm to atlgamecockman
quote:Meeting with a foreign nation is not against US law.
There doesn't have to be for taking the meeting is against the law in itself. You maga boys keep getting wrapped up in the "they didn't actually get anything!" thought. It does not matter.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:11 pm to LSURussian
quote:
I assume you're referring to the meeting with Trump's son.
Has he admitted to other instances in which he broke the law? I mean, other than the felony FEC violations around Stormy, of course.
quote:
It's difficult for me to know what you're referring to because you keep changing your accusations and you're never specific enough to know what you're referring to.
I've been pretty clear- they're guilty of knowingly conspiring with a foreign government to receive aid to win a federal election. This is a crime under US law - the statute has even been cited. Can't get much more specific than that, little buddy.
quote:
what election help did the Russian government give Trump's son at the meeting?
We don't know yet. However, conspiracy doesn't require them to have actually received the help, merely that they sought it.
quote:
What was THE assistance that Trump accepted?
A meeting promising dirt on Clinton from the Russian government to help win a federal election.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:11 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Nope. Doesn't apply. No monetary or other contributions of value were promised, offered or accepted.
52 U.S. Code § 30121 (a)(1)(A)
Try again.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News