Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Question about SCOTUS transgender ruling?

Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:10 pm
Posted by BFIV
Virginia
Member since Apr 2012
9267 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:10 pm
quote:

In the highly anticipated rulings in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, the high court upheld state laws requiring student-athletes to compete on sports teams that correspond with their biological sex at birth rather than their gender identity.


IF a state has no such law, does that mean that transgenders can compete against girls? And if a state that has these laws, then rescinds that law, can transgenders then compete against the girls again? I'm not sure this ruling is what we thought it was?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
117400 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:14 pm to
The court ruled having such laws does not violate Title IX or the Constitution.

The next question (presently unanswered) is whether laws allowing mentally ill men compete against biological females violate Title IX or the Constitution.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
45445 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:24 pm to
The NCAA and Olympic bans also stay in place.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
129735 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:29 pm to
Worth noting that the tranny boy in the case was accused of sexual harassment of the females on the team.

Who could’ve seen it coming?
Posted by lsursb
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
12369 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:32 pm to
i was wondering the same thing. It seems like it is saying it's still ok for a state to ban them from girl's sports, but it is up to each individual state to set the rules. People are saying they "can't" compete in girl's sports anymore.

That doesn't seem to be what the ruling says. It just says WV didn't violate the law by banning them. is that correct?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
129735 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:34 pm to
I think your reading is correct.
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
24778 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

It seems like it is saying it's still ok for a state to ban them from girl's sports, but it is up to each individual state to set the rules.


SCOTUS did not go that far. This was simply a case where a far leftist group filed suit against West Virginia to try to invalidate their law banning mentally disturbed dudes from competing against girls. That was the only question before the court. And, of course, the court said that West Virginia can ban transgender freaks in sports based upon biological sex.

It would’ve been nice had they gone that extra step, but they chose not to. The next case will have to be a “real” female filing suit against a state that allows transgender freaks to compete in girls sports. As someone mentioned above, that will almost certainly involve Title IX.
Posted by AcadieAnne
Space Force Cadet 1st Class
Member since May 2019
1871 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:43 pm to
Correct. A clarification that Title IX is only for biological females is a good first step. Now the buzz in anti-trans spaces is that girls in somewhere like CA, for example, where mentally ill boys are allowed to participate in girls' sports, can sue and get this applied nationwide.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
82561 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

People are saying they "can't" compete in girl's sports anymore.



One of the national articles said they were banned from playing sports. Which is 100% false.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38465 posts
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

IF a state has no such law, does that mean that transgenders can compete against girls? And if a state that has these laws, then rescinds that law, can transgenders then compete against the girls again? I'm not sure this ruling is what we thought it was?

It’s a State matter. If the State wants boys playing girls sports, the State can choose that.
Posted by BFIV
Virginia
Member since Apr 2012
9267 posts
Posted on 7/3/26 at 9:52 am to
quote:

IF a state has no such law, does that mean that transgenders can compete against girls? And if a state that has these laws, then rescinds that law, can transgenders then compete against the girls again? I'm not sure this ruling is what we thought it was?


quote:

The U.S. Supreme Court has codified the protection of laws in 27 states that prevent biological males from competing in women's sports.

"Still, 23 states do not have such a law, and 19 of those states actively allow transgender athletes in girls' sports. The remaining four states restrict participation through state education agencies or athletic association rules rather than official state legislation."


It appears my question has been answered. This SCOTUS decision really hasn't completely protected women's sports after all.

Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69666 posts
Posted on 7/3/26 at 9:54 am to
What are you worried about? It now seems to be up to the individual schools.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
45381 posts
Posted on 7/3/26 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Worth noting that the tranny boy in the case was accused of sexual harassment of the females on the team. Who could’ve seen it coming?


Not SammyTiger.

Evidently he likes it when guys beat the shite out of little girls.

Then again, he is a leftist.

Posted by BFIV
Virginia
Member since Apr 2012
9267 posts
Posted on 7/3/26 at 10:06 am to
quote:

What are you worried about? It now seems to be up to the individual schools.


Worried? Not really. Concerned? Absolutely. I don't want your transgender, mentally unstable, sick, twisted pervert male friends competing against my granddaughters.
Posted by RIPMachoMan
Member since Jun 2011
9469 posts
Posted on 7/3/26 at 10:10 am to
As long you live in a state that bans this, you’re all set.
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
2644 posts
Posted on 7/3/26 at 10:17 am to
There are cases working their way up the ladder that challenge the ability of states to allow biological males to compete against biological females under Title IX. So, most likely we will see that case before SCOTUS in a few years.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram