- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Question about SCOTUS transgender ruling?
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:10 pm
quote:
In the highly anticipated rulings in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, the high court upheld state laws requiring student-athletes to compete on sports teams that correspond with their biological sex at birth rather than their gender identity.
IF a state has no such law, does that mean that transgenders can compete against girls? And if a state that has these laws, then rescinds that law, can transgenders then compete against the girls again? I'm not sure this ruling is what we thought it was?
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:14 pm to BFIV
The court ruled having such laws does not violate Title IX or the Constitution.
The next question (presently unanswered) is whether laws allowing mentally ill men compete against biological females violate Title IX or the Constitution.
The next question (presently unanswered) is whether laws allowing mentally ill men compete against biological females violate Title IX or the Constitution.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:24 pm to BFIV
The NCAA and Olympic bans also stay in place.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:29 pm to BFIV
Worth noting that the tranny boy in the case was accused of sexual harassment of the females on the team.
Who could’ve seen it coming?
Who could’ve seen it coming?
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:32 pm to BFIV
i was wondering the same thing. It seems like it is saying it's still ok for a state to ban them from girl's sports, but it is up to each individual state to set the rules. People are saying they "can't" compete in girl's sports anymore.
That doesn't seem to be what the ruling says. It just says WV didn't violate the law by banning them. is that correct?
That doesn't seem to be what the ruling says. It just says WV didn't violate the law by banning them. is that correct?
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:34 pm to lsursb
I think your reading is correct.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:41 pm to lsursb
quote:
It seems like it is saying it's still ok for a state to ban them from girl's sports, but it is up to each individual state to set the rules.
SCOTUS did not go that far. This was simply a case where a far leftist group filed suit against West Virginia to try to invalidate their law banning mentally disturbed dudes from competing against girls. That was the only question before the court. And, of course, the court said that West Virginia can ban transgender freaks in sports based upon biological sex.
It would’ve been nice had they gone that extra step, but they chose not to. The next case will have to be a “real” female filing suit against a state that allows transgender freaks to compete in girls sports. As someone mentioned above, that will almost certainly involve Title IX.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:43 pm to lsursb
Correct. A clarification that Title IX is only for biological females is a good first step. Now the buzz in anti-trans spaces is that girls in somewhere like CA, for example, where mentally ill boys are allowed to participate in girls' sports, can sue and get this applied nationwide.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:44 pm to lsursb
quote:
People are saying they "can't" compete in girl's sports anymore.
One of the national articles said they were banned from playing sports. Which is 100% false.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:51 pm to BFIV
quote:
IF a state has no such law, does that mean that transgenders can compete against girls? And if a state that has these laws, then rescinds that law, can transgenders then compete against the girls again? I'm not sure this ruling is what we thought it was?
It’s a State matter. If the State wants boys playing girls sports, the State can choose that.
Popular
Back to top
5









