Started By
Message

re: Qualified Immunity for Concealed Permit Holders?

Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:23 pm to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26492 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Aren't all Marines infantry first, MOS secondary ?

I think, but crayon eater may come in 2nd
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11228 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Let everyone carry concealed as god intended. Fix the law to protect everyone from frivolous lawsuits.


As long as those protections never extend to a criminal.

quote:

The CC permit class isn't some master class that teaches you perfect judgement in bad situations.


It's more than just a class, permit holders also have to undergo an extensive criminal background check and submit fingerprints to the FBI.

As far as perfect judgement.....there's no such thing as a good kill. There is only a reasonable decision. And there is a lot of help available with that.

If you're going to carry and you're going to use it but you don't prepare for the situation, leave it at home.
There is a lot of help available with that.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54753 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Lay out what's wrong with protecting me from a civil lawsuit for a "good" kill.


If you have a "good" kill you don't need qualified immunity. Qualified immunity would protect you individually if you were negligent or made a "mistake" that resulted in a "bad" kill. You're not a member of the government carrying out a governmental function. You shouldn't have qualified immunity...you should think very carefully before discharging your weapon in public in the direction of another citizen or citizens.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21820 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Aren't all Marines infantry first, MOS secondary ?


Every Marine is a rifleman first, not infantry.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28476 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

If you do not have conceal carry permit, you’ll have no protection from being found civilly liable for shooting someone.

False.
La Law already provides various legal protections for use in home, or vehicle, or even in standard self defense situations.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11228 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

RS 14:19 and 14:20


That's criminal code - No?

You have the right to use force to prevent unlawful entry in Louisiana. 14:19 A(b)(i)
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21820 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

..you should think very carefully before discharging your weapon in public in the direction of another citizen or citizens.


So should law enforcement.
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5719 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

There should be plenty of examples of that happening under current law then.


There should be. I described the procedure through which a civil defendant would have to go in resolving a civil claim against him for self defense with a firearm. You previously offered criminal statutes for justifiable homicide and suggested the laws already protect such defendants. I’m not sure why you think criminal statutes are relevant to a civil lawsuit:

quote:

RS 14:19 and 14:20 for starters. I’m sure there are more along with jurisprudence if you care to look for it. You have the right to use force in defense of your selves or others in Louisiana.
Posted by cutigersfan
Member since Jan 2019
584 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:38 pm to
6 of this, half dozen of that.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11228 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Qualified immunity would protect you individually if you were negligent or made a "mistake" that resulted in a "bad" kill.


As usual you're wrong.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28476 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Stand your ground protects you from criminal liability not civil they can still sue you and wether they win or not bankrupt you with legal fees

False, mostly.

§2800.19. Limitation of liability for use of force in defense of certain crimes

A. A person who uses reasonable and apparently necessary or deadly force or violence for the purpose of preventing a forcible offense against the person or his property in accordance with R.S. 14:19 (self defense, non death) or 20 (Justifiable homicide) is immune from civil action for the use of reasonable and apparently necessary or deadly force or violence.

B. The court shall award reasonable attorney fees, court costs, compensation for loss of income, and all expenses to the defendant in any civil action if the court finds that the defendant is immune from suit in accordance with Subsection A of this Section.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11228 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

§2800.19. Limitation of liability for use of force in defense of certain crimes

A. A person who uses reasonable and apparently necessary or deadly force or violence for the purpose of preventing a forcible offense against the person or his property in accordance with R.S. 14:19 (self defense, non death) or 20 (Justifiable homicide) is immune from civil action for the use of reasonable and apparently necessary or deadly force or violence.

B. The court shall award reasonable attorney fees, court costs, compensation for loss of income, and all expenses to the defendant in any civil action if the court finds that the defendant is immune from suit in accordance with Subsection A of this Section.


Thank you.

But could an attorney argue that my ammo was specifically designed to cause death and it was unreasonable and or unnecessary to use it on the victim?

Maybe that's where QI would cover more scenarios.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21820 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

6 of this, half dozen of that.



No.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28476 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Thank you.

It's important that all are knowledgeable of the law and the extent/limitations of it. That way if they ever have to make that split second decision, it can be made with some certainty and avoid dire hesitation.

quote:

But could an attorney argue that my ammo was specifically designed to cause death and it was unreasonable and or unnecessary to use it on the victim?


An attorney can argue anything. But they risk:
quote:

reasonable attorney fees, court costs, compensation for loss of income, and all expenses to the defendant in any civil action if the court finds that the defendant is immune from suit in accordance with Subsection A of this Section

Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23744 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

What if the attempted murderer has a concealed carry permit? This is a dumb law.

The concern is that a hothead has a carry permit and he draws whenever he gets into an argument. If he has qualified immunity and the other person in the argument is dead, he walks every time.

People are crazy. Extend immunity to the general public with a concealed carry permit and this will be abused big time.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73456 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:09 pm to
Big time?

Idiot
Posted by ChanceOfRainIsNever
Far from Louisiana
Member since Oct 2016
2129 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

I am an Army vet. I was just reading your post, and 1 thing caught my attention. Aren't all Marines infantry first, MOS secondary ?


Just like you guys have 11B we have 03s. School trained rifleman as my MOS 0311. And orange crayons are my favorite
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
14739 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

This law would tell the family to frick off.


The family would be told to frick off anyway in your hypo. This law in no way would stop someone from filing a lawsuit for millions.
Posted by zaniesmo12
Member since May 2020
105 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:31 pm to
Criminals should have no right to sue victims at all. Criminals deserve punishment - not victims who must use a firearm in self-defense.
Posted by Dex Morgan
Member since Nov 2022
1336 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:54 pm to
No one should have qualified immunity. Especially not cops who are supposed to be professionals. Currently, as someone who carries concealed, I am held to a higher degree of liability than a cop is if I make a bad shot. And the taxpayers won't be footing the bill for my mistake either. Bad cops face no consequences thanks to qualified immunity.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram