- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Putin says if NATO allows Ukr to launch long range missiles into Rus, then it’s direct war
Posted on 9/13/24 at 5:51 am to N.O. via West-Cal
Posted on 9/13/24 at 5:51 am to N.O. via West-Cal
quote:
Who gives a crap what that POS Putin says!? He invaded a sovereign nation, thereby engaging in direct war. He can unilaterally end the “direct war” that he started.
Makes sense why you think this.
quote:
West-Cal
1
Posted on 9/13/24 at 5:54 am to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
Washington and this dangerous administration in particular, along with the devil worshiping WEF types in Europe, seem to want to burn the world to the ground.
Of course they do. That's the plan. The old system must be destroyed to install another system. Everything you see the Marxist doing to destroy America is intentional.
Stop pretending and start trusting what you see happening.
Posted on 9/13/24 at 5:57 am to N.O. via West-Cal
quote:
Who gives a crap what that POS Putin says!? He invaded a sovereign nation, thereby engaging in direct war. He can unilaterally end the “direct war” that he started
I guess that logic works for you, but it's not reality. Putin won't stop until the reason he invaded is no longer a threat to Russia.
Do more research. This shite isn't hidden in a secret vault.
Posted on 9/13/24 at 5:58 am to OMLandshark
Send that eye patch wearing mother fricker too
Posted on 9/13/24 at 6:01 am to N.O. via West-Cal
quote:
Who gives a crap what that POS Putin says!? He invaded a sovereign nation, thereby engaging in direct war. He can unilaterally end the “direct war” that he started.
If it escalates into a war involving nukes a lot of people are going to "give a crap"
Posted on 9/13/24 at 6:05 am to OMLandshark
quote:I wish you were right but you know what's going to happen.
so the ones who put us in this situation are the first to go. Sorry, that’s fair.
They'll send a generation of our young men to die in fire for eastern Ukraine. Then when they come home we won't take care of them. They'll go to sleep cold in the streets with no mental healthcare at all while our government takes our money and redistributes it to illegals immigrants.
If the US decides to go to war with Russia there should be a full rebellion in the US.
We cannot risk real nuclear war, this is insanity.
Posted on 9/13/24 at 10:31 am to Solo Cam
In the next 45 days there will be a Cuban missile crisis type / like event. It will end the same way, maybe with egg on our face this time as far as who backs down which is warranted given that we are the aggressors this time, , but no actual nuked cities.
Perhaps a battle-field nuke use in a NATO country against a tactical target as worse-case scenario.
Biden does not have access to the buttons.
Putin is working with the white hats to help take our country, and really the world back from the puppet masters that have been controlling it and want to enslave us all, kill off a bunch of us and bring about the new globalist world order with AI replacing us and then ruling over it all.
Even though in one sense (the WWIII part) it’s all a sham / a show, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Millions of lives are at stake, just in a different way / from a different threat.
Listen when they tell you who they are. They want to drastically reduce world population to save the climate.
This is not an ordinary 4 year election. It will be too big to rig, we can’t take the chance.
The WWW III precipice event will wake up / bring over a huge percentage of the democrats sheep to our side.
We were told.
Trump was asked to run by Mil Intel in 2015 to bring all this about, so we didn’t have to go through a hot civil war.
So don’t go crazy and do anything drastic at the height of fear, it’s going to be ok
Things will be great again soon, greater than they ever have in our lifetimes.
NCSWIC
Oh and the market is going to crash soon too.
Perhaps a battle-field nuke use in a NATO country against a tactical target as worse-case scenario.
Biden does not have access to the buttons.
Putin is working with the white hats to help take our country, and really the world back from the puppet masters that have been controlling it and want to enslave us all, kill off a bunch of us and bring about the new globalist world order with AI replacing us and then ruling over it all.
Even though in one sense (the WWIII part) it’s all a sham / a show, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Millions of lives are at stake, just in a different way / from a different threat.
Listen when they tell you who they are. They want to drastically reduce world population to save the climate.
This is not an ordinary 4 year election. It will be too big to rig, we can’t take the chance.
The WWW III precipice event will wake up / bring over a huge percentage of the democrats sheep to our side.
We were told.
Trump was asked to run by Mil Intel in 2015 to bring all this about, so we didn’t have to go through a hot civil war.
So don’t go crazy and do anything drastic at the height of fear, it’s going to be ok
Things will be great again soon, greater than they ever have in our lifetimes.
NCSWIC
Oh and the market is going to crash soon too.
This post was edited on 9/13/24 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 9/13/24 at 10:45 am to OMLandshark
Biden administration doesn't want war but they will get us into it. Biden has no confident leadership on world stage.
Posted on 9/13/24 at 10:59 am to Load Toad
They don’t want direct confrontation with Russia, but they keep the proxy war nice and hot.
When Z and his Azov pals launch a few ATACMS into downtown Moscow, it will push the US and Russia right to the brink. And we all know that Z Man will do what it takes to drag the US in.
It’s insanity
When Z and his Azov pals launch a few ATACMS into downtown Moscow, it will push the US and Russia right to the brink. And we all know that Z Man will do what it takes to drag the US in.
It’s insanity
Posted on 9/13/24 at 11:17 am to Buryl
So let's say the US and Mexico have an altercation. Mexico reclaims Baja California, and hostilities break out between us and them. We get the upper hand (expected), but then Mexico decides to call in help. Russia, China, North Korea (whoever you want to place in that column) begin to supplement the Mexicans with long range missiles capable of making strike in OKC, Dallas, Los Angeles, Denver, etc. They begin lobbing them over the border with no real utility other than to create chaos and undermine our daily living. How quickly do you think the US citizens would call for a strike on those providing those weapons? How long before we reach out and attempt to bitchslap the group supplying them?
I don't think that someone of you think to clearly about this situation. Three years ago when the altercation occurred in Crimea where Ukrainians and Russians exchanged fire and several troops were killed, I predicted a war and was told there is nothing going to happen. This goes n all the time. Well, you see how incorrect that was. The world is at a tipping point and these "little" things quickly escalate into bigger things.
Suppose that an American aircraft carrier is struck by a Russian sub, or vise versa? What little thing may be the apple that upsets the cart?
This administration needs to think really hard before allowing this action if they want to contain this exercise of futility. Striking Russian might be the awakening of a sleeping bear. They are not the immasculated thug they are being described here. They have and will continue to be a formidable enemy if the gloves are taken off.
I don't think that someone of you think to clearly about this situation. Three years ago when the altercation occurred in Crimea where Ukrainians and Russians exchanged fire and several troops were killed, I predicted a war and was told there is nothing going to happen. This goes n all the time. Well, you see how incorrect that was. The world is at a tipping point and these "little" things quickly escalate into bigger things.
Suppose that an American aircraft carrier is struck by a Russian sub, or vise versa? What little thing may be the apple that upsets the cart?
This administration needs to think really hard before allowing this action if they want to contain this exercise of futility. Striking Russian might be the awakening of a sleeping bear. They are not the immasculated thug they are being described here. They have and will continue to be a formidable enemy if the gloves are taken off.
Posted on 9/13/24 at 11:26 am to DocYatesVA
quote:
So let's say the US and Mexico have an altercation. Mexico reclaims Baja California, and hostilities break out between us and them
Let’s fix the errors in this scenario.
The Corrected version would be more like this:
The US invades Mexico. With a full blockade, thousand missle bombardments leveling small towns, attacks on nuclear power plants and energy infrastructure, kidnaps children, holds fake elections to claim US territory, and slaughters 10s of thousands of civilians indiscriminately.
The international community would support Mexico until the US left them alone.
Posted on 9/13/24 at 11:30 am to AGGIES
Isn’t that exactly what we did to Iraq?
Posted on 9/13/24 at 11:34 am to lsuoilengr
quote:
Isn’t that exactly what we did to Iraq?
Not exactly, Iraq was more surgical, and most of the things I listed that are happening in Ukraine did not happen in Iraq.
But George Bush and the US was wrong to go after Saddam Husain. Iraq was not behind 9/11 - so the US should have been after Bin Laden.
Posted on 9/13/24 at 12:54 pm to Cuthbert13
Resorting to ad hom right off the bat reflects poorly on the substance of your position. Regarding the Russian invasion of Ukraine, I take it you’re fine with Putin taking it over in total, right? How about Lithuania? Poland?
I favor providing Ukraine with weaponry and materiel to defend their country but would not favor involvement of US troops. What is your position?
I favor providing Ukraine with weaponry and materiel to defend their country but would not favor involvement of US troops. What is your position?
Posted on 9/13/24 at 12:59 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
then it’s direct war
They haven't been fighting a direct war so far?
Posted on 9/13/24 at 3:55 pm to Sidicous
quote:
World War III is one hell of an October Surprise I’ll give the Dems that one. DimProgFilth will try to somehow make it Trump’s fault too.
They will leave him a big mess to clean up AND blame him.
Posted on 9/13/24 at 3:57 pm to OMLandshark
So what was Putin's invasion of Ukraine? Indirect war?
Posted on 9/13/24 at 3:58 pm to 632627
Ask nato. Putin said he would invade if nato got closer. FAFO
Posted on 9/13/24 at 3:59 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Putin says if NATO allows Ukr to launch long range missiles into Rus, then it’s direct war
I would say 'no more mean tweets' but OMB is back on X
Democrats couldn't even accomplish that
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News