- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PSA, If you are a White Woman, don’t plan on taking the bus or stand at the bus stop.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:47 pm to wackatimesthree
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:47 pm to wackatimesthree
Cubbies
Can you respond to wacka’s post?
Your response to that post would be a big value add to the thread.
Can you respond to wacka’s post?
Your response to that post would be a big value add to the thread.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:48 pm to Audustxx
quote:the age/gender demo that actually does this = 2%
13%
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:51 pm to Kafka
quote:
the age/gender demo that actually does this = 2%
And at least 10% don't even care.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:52 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
The context in which you are posting it frames it in such a way as to implicitly claim that white women are in all cases safer being around white men that they know rather than black men that they don't know.
In all cases? No. White women have been victimized by men of all races. As a white woman, I am aware that men of all races are dangerous. I don’t think that’s a secret.
In terms of violence, wonen (and men) are typically victimized by people they know. Not strangers.
This post was edited on 12/21/25 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:59 pm to LordSaintly
I know I know
It was just genuinely funny thinking deeply about those guys cutting off their friend and the conversation they’d have.
I don’t have a single friend who wouldn’t be beaten to within an inch of their lives if we saw them do that. And half would make sure our entire town/central Florida knew what happened. Forever. You’d probably have to leave Lakeland if you did that in my friend group. Where would one even be welcomed after that?
It was just genuinely funny thinking deeply about those guys cutting off their friend and the conversation they’d have.
I don’t have a single friend who wouldn’t be beaten to within an inch of their lives if we saw them do that. And half would make sure our entire town/central Florida knew what happened. Forever. You’d probably have to leave Lakeland if you did that in my friend group. Where would one even be welcomed after that?
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:03 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
White women have been victimized by men of all races. As a white woman, I am aware that men of all races are dangerous.
Then why did you frame your posts to the contrary? And if that wasn't really the point of the posts, what was?
quote:
In terms of violence, wonen (and men) are typically victimized by people they know. Not strangers.
Which is exactly why:
1. It's NOT significant that white men (and women) are statistically most likely to assault each other, and also...
2. It's HIGHLY significant that black men manage to buck that trend by a factor of 12 in the case of murder
That's the whole point.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:03 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
In terms of violence, wonen (and men) are typically victimized by people they know. Not strangers.
True, but we are talking about random stranger violence, which you have always been a supporter of if given the choice between immigration enforcement and ignorance.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:03 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
I'm not shocked that was your takeaway though.
Coincidentally, the angel we picked from the angel tree at church this year had a DV shelter on it. We donated like 50 tubs of play doh for the kids there. I can imagine your disapproval that these women chose to get beaten up by the fathers of their kids while the real victims of violence are white women who black men prey on that we learn about from Kentucky Girl on Twitter.
Your pomposity is palpable.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:04 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
In terms of violence, wonen (and men) are typically victimized by people they know. Not strangers.
There's another interesting thread you oughta visit... a career criminal of 72 arrests that a judge let go and he proceeded to set another person on fire.
In case you were wondering... it was a black dude and a white woman.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:05 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
We donated like 50 tubs of play doh for the kids there. I can imagine your disapproval that these women chose to get beaten up by the fathers of their kids
You dumb runt... if they were in a DV shelter, of course they decided to NOT be some man's punching bag.
This post was edited on 12/21/25 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:05 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
4cubbies
One person is "many?"
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:05 pm to djsdawg
quote:
but we are talking about random stranger violence, which you have always been a supporter of if given the choice between immigration enforcement and ignorance.
Y’all have some active imaginations.
I don’t condone violence of any kind.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:07 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
if they were in a DV shelter, of course they decided to NOT be some man's punching back.
So now these women didn’t have agency in getting beaten up? What changed since your previous post?
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:08 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
One person is "many?"
She is legion.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:09 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
So now these women didn’t have agency in getting beaten up?
Are you retarded? Hard of reading, perhaps?
Women in DV shelters have decided to not get beaten- hence their presence in the DV shelter.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:10 pm to 4cubbies
You cannot be a real person
Has Slow ever taken time to discuss these numbers or similar numbers and narratives with cubbies?
I find it statistically impossible for him to have not done that by now, given his propensity for correcting wildly ridiculous takes.
How is it that we don’t see him meticulously discuss things like this with our left wing posters?
His excuse has always fallen MILES short with me. “There aren’t any left wing posters on the poli board” or another one that’s “they’re so wrong why bother.”
shite don’t smell right here.
Has Slow ever taken time to discuss these numbers or similar numbers and narratives with cubbies?
I find it statistically impossible for him to have not done that by now, given his propensity for correcting wildly ridiculous takes.
How is it that we don’t see him meticulously discuss things like this with our left wing posters?
His excuse has always fallen MILES short with me. “There aren’t any left wing posters on the poli board” or another one that’s “they’re so wrong why bother.”
shite don’t smell right here.
This post was edited on 12/21/25 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:11 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Coincidentally, the angel we picked from the angel tree at church this year had a DV shelter on it. We donated like 50 tubs of play doh for the kids there. I can imagine your disapproval that these women chose to get beaten up by the fathers of their kids while the real victims of violence are white women who black men prey on that we learn about from Kentucky Girl on Twitter.
You seem to be having a really hard time understanding that someone who gets beat up at home and someone one who gets beat up at a bus stop are both equally victimized (whether all other aspects of the situation are equal is highly debatable, but I'll let that one go for now.)
All you have to do is post a video of some man or woman getting beat up at home and it will get the same condemnation as this one did.
The whataboutism tactic does invite distracted responses, but it doesn't maintain the smoke and mirrors for very long.
This post was edited on 12/21/25 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:12 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Has Slow ever taken time to discuss these numbers or similar numbers and narratives with cubbies?
I find it statistically impossible for him to have not done that by now, given his propensity for correcting wildly ridiculous takes.
How is it that we don’t see him meticulously discuss things like this with our left wing posters?
His excuse has always fallen MILES short with me. “There aren’t any left wing posters on the poli board” or another one that’s “they’re so wrong why bother.”
shite don’t smell right here.
If only there was a historical explanation for that.
Popular
Back to top



0





