- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pro-lifer struck with cane, shoved by pro-choice demonstrators
Posted on 5/29/19 at 11:46 am to bfniii
Posted on 5/29/19 at 11:46 am to bfniii
quote:Well, I did address all of that, and you continued to rely upon the purely philosophical concept of personhood (which I grant is SOMEWHAT related). I came to realize that I could answer your questions 100 times and that in your 101st post you would still insist that I was not doing so.
hank wants to pin everything on something even more elusive - higher brain activity because ( ) that's what separates humans from animals. higher brain activity (he likes to sound sophisticated and use the term sapience which is even more vague) is a moving target, subjective and hank gives absolutely no reason why this should be the deciding factor other than you just have to take his word for it. now that i've narrowed him down on that, he's been scarce around here and definitely hasn't shown up in the other thread.
I honestly cannot decide if you are a troll or simply an idiot. I lean toward the latter. Either way, I decided not to waste further time on you.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 11:47 am
1
Posted on 5/29/19 at 11:52 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Well, I did address all of that, and you continued to rely upon the purely philosophical concept of personhood (which I grant is SOMEWHAT related). I came to realize that I could answer your questions 100 times and that in your 101st post you would still insist that I was not doing so.
Literally 100% of arguments that say the baby CAN be aborted at some point have the same challenge that literally 100% of them cannot overcome.
If one argues "you can kill it on X day or when it meets X criterion", one still has to deal with what precise microsecond did this magic transition take place?
It would literally be different for ever pregnancy.
The bottom line remains. EVERYONE agrees that you can't kill it 5 minutes from popping out(well, I used to think everyone agreed on this.........but liberals are starting to prove me wrong).
Thus, since all but the worst nutjobs agree on this, and babies do NOT develop in "steps", we have a "magic moment" problem.
Posted on 6/27/19 at 8:49 am to oogabooga68
quote:
He's a raging Narcissist like his Leftist heroes....
Seriously, Buckeye has some VERY REAL problems....not kidding....
He must have been banned again. haven't seen him spamming these threads in a month or so.
Posted on 6/27/19 at 9:23 am to AggieHank86
quote:
When one sees himself using rhetoric similar to Gaspergou, one would be wise to reexamine one’s approach.
frick off, Hank. Your need to be seen as board sage is stupid. Just piss the hell off and try your stupid shite in real life.
Page 10 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News