Started By
Message

re: Potential Terrorist/BLM Shooting Spree in Fresno

Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:35 pm to
Posted by LSU_Saints_Hornets
Uptown NO,LA
Member since Jan 2013
9739 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

I know you think Michael Brown died for no reason but your argument about this/him makes you look like a fool.



What was the reason?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138889 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:36 pm to
quote:


Dammit you are right. I was wrong here is what was claimed.

quote:
Here are some other truths: Officer Darren Wilson's facial injuries are inconsistent with his claim that Brown assaulted him at close range, causing Wilson to fear for his life and ultimately pull his gun. Wilson was allowed to drive himself back to the station and put the murder weapon in the evidence locker himself.


So if all this evidence was pointing toward Wilson murdering Brown in cold blood, why did Obama and Holder let him walk?
Posted by TheXman
Middle America
Member since Feb 2017
2984 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:36 pm to
He tried to disarm a police officer and the officer feared for his life.

Next question.
Posted by LSU_Saints_Hornets
Uptown NO,LA
Member since Jan 2013
9739 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Dale51


quote:

Pollock, whose Facebook page lists him as the Creative Director for Michael Moore


You reaching now. You care to comment on the facts that were presented in the argument?
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65274 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

They claim that discrimination + power is the only way racism can exist.
Yep. This is their bullshite liberal academic definition. It's designed to rationalize their leftist agenda.

They also preach that all white people are inherently racist, so you don't even have to get out of bed in the morning, much less say anything critical, and you're still a racist. Blacks are not capable of being racist, of course.
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

What was the reason?



He was a dumbass who decided to resist arrest.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87283 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:38 pm to
FYI, Rita Katz, who runs a private intel firm, claims Muhammad posted "Black warriors mount up and ride out" yesterday. Also praised Dallas shooter at the time.

From Twitter.
Posted by TheXman
Middle America
Member since Feb 2017
2984 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

You reaching now.


You've reached during this entire argument man.

This is the reason that people don't take BLM and their agenda seriously.

They use examples like Brown and Sterling where the cops were 100% within their rights (and I would say 100% correct) in doing what they did.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138889 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Yep. This is their bullshite liberal academic definition. It's designed to rationalize their leftist agenda.

They continue to prove that equality is not the end game. They continue to force society into accepting or excusing the weak points of their culture rather than making them improve themselves. Giving everyone else cancer doesn't cure cancer.
This post was edited on 4/18/17 at 4:42 pm
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

You care to comment on the facts that were presented in the argument?


What facts? Yes or no questions are not designed to get to the facts.

In your opinion, based on your linked article and claim of the facts found there, what is the single most powerful fact exposed in that article that should change people minds about the racist thug criminal Michael Brown?
Posted by LSU_Saints_Hornets
Uptown NO,LA
Member since Jan 2013
9739 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

He tried to disarm a police officer and the officer feared for his life.


So the person with the gun is in fear of their life but the person without the gun is not? That sounds like a reasonable defense.
Posted by TheXman
Middle America
Member since Feb 2017
2984 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:43 pm to
It is well within the scope of the law and a police officers abilities to do exactly as he did.

So yes it is an extremely reasonable defense speaking from a perspective of legality.

But you're just making emotional arguments so carry on.
This post was edited on 4/18/17 at 4:44 pm
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

BLM has been pretty calm since the election. If I had to guess this has more to do with radical islam than BLM I'm guessing a combo. I doubt this guy was a radical Muslim in the traditional sense. Probably more NOI than ISIS


One of the Muslims killed by police at the ISIS-claimed Garland, Texas cartoon contest was a black American.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

So the person with the gun is in fear of their life but the person without the gun is not?

Under what dynamic are you presenting this logical fallacy? Can you explain the actions taking place during this situation?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138889 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:44 pm to
quote:


So the person with the gun is in fear of their life but the person without the gun is not? That sounds like a reasonable defense.



So if all this evidence was pointing toward Wilson murdering Brown in cold blood, why did Obama and Holder let him walk?
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

So the person with the gun is in fear of their life but the person without the gun is not? That sounds like a reasonable defense.



If you had a gun and J. J. Watt was mad and tried to take it from you, would you be scared?
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

So the person with the gun is in fear of their life but the person without the gun is not? That sounds like a reasonable defense.

It is very reasonable. People (cops included) have their own guns taken from them and killed because they didn't have the time or the heart to blow them away when they could.

Why should the same defense afforded you, if you met up with someone who could take your gun from you and kill you with it, not be available to a police officer?
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:48 pm to
MSNBC still has not literally said a single word about this Islamic Terrorist Attack.

I am adderall'd up and have had it on the Sonos b/c they have the best election coverage and I swear to God they haven't mentioned it a single time.

Makes me so fricking angry
This post was edited on 4/18/17 at 4:49 pm
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56145 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

So the person with the gun is in fear of their life but the person without the gun is not?


So you're standing there with a gun in your hand and a guy bigger than you is coming at you. You're saying you're going to give up your gun to him to see if he will shoot you with it cause you ain't scared?

Good luck in relating that episode later.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65274 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

They continue to prove that equality is not the end game
Right. Whites dominate the power structure (because we built it) in this country, so the left (not just blacks) have to come up with a philosophical strategy to tear away at it. It could be Indians or Asians and the message would be exactly the same.
quote:

They continue to force society into accepting or excusing the weak points of their culture rather than making them improve themselves.
It's more about creating a useless, violent culture to tear down the dominant one. Seriously, a culture has been created over the last few decades in which being a criminal thug is seen as admirable and a path to wealth. Education is for "punks."

Some despicable pieces of shite orchestrated the putrification of black culture in America, yet whites are supposedly the evil ones.
quote:

Giving everyone else cancer doesn't cure cancer
No, it kills society so that their supposed "utopia" can be put in its place. It really is Marxism 101. Don't kid yourself. Their old strategy used to be to laugh it off and hide behind code words like "progressive," but in recent years, they've been admitting it more and more.
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram