- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Potential Terrorist/BLM Shooting Spree in Fresno
Posted on 4/18/17 at 5:56 pm to Pettifogger
Posted on 4/18/17 at 5:56 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Stratfor claims Islam-related ("shouted allahu akbar as arrested")
Arrested? bullshite, take his gun and put a bullet in his head, that way the taxpayers are spared from all costs for this POS
Posted on 4/18/17 at 5:56 pm to Pettifogger
I mentioned it in my first post. Numerous people on the first page called you out as well. Quit being cute
Posted on 4/18/17 at 5:56 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
just be happy you are on the "right" side for this board
I was told OP was a cuck?
Posted on 4/18/17 at 5:59 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
I mentioned it in my first post. Numerous people on the first page called you out as well. Quit being cute
And I responded, and you've since said nothing of substance. Several people did call me out (more effectively, btw), and I responded to them as well.
More evidence has come out indicating this guy may have been as motivated by racial hostility as Islam (or more so), so the question is whether it was unfair for me to tie BLM to this guy.
I don't think it is, based on the fact that BLM is more of an ideology and movement than a defined entity. But again, I invite critique.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:00 pm to Pettifogger
It is absurd to tie a crime to any group without proof. Thankfully, you are a keyboard jockey and not an LEO or reporter.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:01 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
reporter
Been really tough on BLM
Amirite?
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:02 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
It is absurd to tie a crime to any group without proof. Thankfully, you are a keyboard jockey and not an LEO or reporter.
I'm going to guess that when the press ties violence to Trump, or the Tea Party, or the NYT editorial page blamed Republicans for the Orlando terror attack, you said the same thing.
Of course, the reality is that I have more evidence of what went on here than you did.
You came in here and got huffy because someone dared tie BLM to a violent act. You started posting before you even read what occurred. Which is why now you're pretty much in a spot where you can't argue in support of your original position.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:03 pm to thelawnwranglers
Well nothing short of calling it a terrorist organization would satisfy the poli board.
Based on threads like this... Its pretty clear that the media has been relatively fair compared to you fine folk..
Based on threads like this... Its pretty clear that the media has been relatively fair compared to you fine folk..
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:04 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
Based on threads like this... Its pretty clear that the media has been relatively fair compared to you fine folk..
More than fair . . . they've over-indulged the situation into oblivion over on CNN/MSNBC
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:05 pm to Pettifogger
You've already proved your vivid imagination in the OP. No need to continue making shite up
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:07 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
Well nothing short of calling it a terrorist organization would satisfy the poli board. ?
Based on threads like this... Its pretty clear that the media has been relatively fair compared to you fine folk..
Lol so media is just evening out slant and reach of poli board?
Your okay peps too. We are going to get your politics righted
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:07 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
I'd rather rustle the OP for his obvious race bait and move on.
Can you please leave now as promised?
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:08 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
You've already proved your vivid imagination in the OP. No need to continue making shite up
No, loser. You've been proven wrong again.

Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:09 pm to upgrayedd
BTW it's funny that I'm race baiting about a subject where the guy admitted a racial motive
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:15 pm to PoundFoolish
Look up any of my old posts on this. Do you consider anyone on social media who has used that hashtag to be "in" the group?
If i tweet it now and rob an old lady next week is it a "BLM robbery"?
how dumb is that?
If i tweet it now and rob an old lady next week is it a "BLM robbery"?
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:17 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
Look up any of my old posts on this. Do you consider anyone on social media who has used that hashtag to be "in" the group?
If i tweet it now and rob an old lady next week is it a "BLM robbery"?
how dumb is that?
I don't consider a buffalo stampede to be officially sanctioned by buffaloes, but I know rhetorical influence and institutionally connected acts of terror/violence when I see it.
This post was edited on 4/18/17 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:19 pm to TheXman
quote:
Even the fringe supporters are doing things 'in the name of Allah'.
Interesting...members of my church do things 'in the name of Jesus Christ'. Things like man soup kitchens, go on mission trips, raise money for disaster victims.
Similar, no?
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:20 pm to PoundFoolish
Institutionally sanctioned acts of terror huh?
I dont believe in BLM's tactics and especially the lack of message control due to it being a phrase anyone can adopt anywhere.
That said, your statement is ridiculous. You give them way too much credit frankly.
I dont believe in BLM's tactics and especially the lack of message control due to it being a phrase anyone can adopt anywhere.
That said, your statement is ridiculous. You give them way too much credit frankly.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:22 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
You give them way too much credit frankly.
i dunno. the malleability of their bullshite seems ripe to associate with the fringe
if people (esp the media) are going to give BLM support and praise for things tangentially associated with leadership, they should be just as equal in promoting all the negative acts done in a similar, tangential relationship to the group
if the media ignored them or called them out for their bullshite? no need, but since they protect and coddle BLM, logically they have to do both
This post was edited on 4/18/17 at 6:23 pm
Popular
Back to top



0






