- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pope, we must avoid rigid ideologies
Posted on 12/25/23 at 5:17 am to Revelator
Posted on 12/25/23 at 5:17 am to Revelator
I'm sure this has already said in here, but it never ceases to amaze me how most people on this board (A) understand how dishonest the MSM is but then (B) lap up all the lies they spew about Catholicism without reservation.
The pope did NOT change church doctrine. The MSM completely misrepresented the document, and way too many people fell for it. It's just now starting to settle out, but something tells me the Catholic-haters on here are not interested in either learning the truth or (gasp) reading the document for themselves.
Here are a few points:
1. It spends a lot of time describing that marriage is between a man and a woman and the only moral expression of sexual love.
2. It explicitly says it can't bless same-sex unions and cites a 2021 document that says the Church can't bless sin.
3. It was written in context of German bishops (bunch o heretics) offering liturgical blessings to same-sex unions. This document says YOU CANT DO THAT. It then describes what you can do, which is a simple pastoral blessing of the individuals in the union that asks God to bless what is good and true in their lives but not what is sinful (ie their union). In other words, the Pope has rejected what the far-left German bishops were doing (which he would not have done if everyone on this board was right about him).
4. It explicitly says that a blessing cannot be interpreted as legitimization of their relationship.
5. It explicitly says that a blessing can't take place in a ceremonial fashion or in conjunction with a legal civil union.
Like I said, it's really a simple read. Go look yourself instead of listening to people fight about it. It is a little ambiguous in a couple of parts, and I see why some people get a little uneasy with it when they pair it with the notion that Francis is trying to change church teaching. But even then, it's very clear that he DID NOT change church teaching. It's more a complaint about the style of a document meant for priests that doesn't carry papal infallibility with it.
For anyone who wants to hear a balanced discussion of it, try Trent Horn's and Ben Shapiro's discussion of it.
Youtube Link
The pope did NOT change church doctrine. The MSM completely misrepresented the document, and way too many people fell for it. It's just now starting to settle out, but something tells me the Catholic-haters on here are not interested in either learning the truth or (gasp) reading the document for themselves.
Here are a few points:
1. It spends a lot of time describing that marriage is between a man and a woman and the only moral expression of sexual love.
2. It explicitly says it can't bless same-sex unions and cites a 2021 document that says the Church can't bless sin.
3. It was written in context of German bishops (bunch o heretics) offering liturgical blessings to same-sex unions. This document says YOU CANT DO THAT. It then describes what you can do, which is a simple pastoral blessing of the individuals in the union that asks God to bless what is good and true in their lives but not what is sinful (ie their union). In other words, the Pope has rejected what the far-left German bishops were doing (which he would not have done if everyone on this board was right about him).
4. It explicitly says that a blessing cannot be interpreted as legitimization of their relationship.
5. It explicitly says that a blessing can't take place in a ceremonial fashion or in conjunction with a legal civil union.
Like I said, it's really a simple read. Go look yourself instead of listening to people fight about it. It is a little ambiguous in a couple of parts, and I see why some people get a little uneasy with it when they pair it with the notion that Francis is trying to change church teaching. But even then, it's very clear that he DID NOT change church teaching. It's more a complaint about the style of a document meant for priests that doesn't carry papal infallibility with it.
For anyone who wants to hear a balanced discussion of it, try Trent Horn's and Ben Shapiro's discussion of it.
Youtube Link
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:21 am to Revelator
quote:
I don’t. I have things I believe about salvation that have never changed, but my theology about eschatology has changed a great deal in 40 years and probably will continue to change as I grow in knowledge.
I’m open to different viewpoints and listen to preachers and teachers that don’t believe the way I do.
I'll list a few, as a preacher called unto prophecy 40 years ago, who got rebuked by God about 8 years ago when I prayed, "Lord why are there so many understandings about Babylon, the Beasts, the 144,000 when you said in the last days you would pour out your spirit in the end times, and would reveal all things Daniel was told".
And I got this answer, (Short and sweet). "Ron, you guys already know it all" And from that day forward, I have learned not to trust in old understanding which came from men many, many times and to reevaluates everything I once knew, or at least to look at things with a critical eye. And what I have found is when you wrestle with God for answers, He will always give them unto you. So, if you see anything that doesn't quite add up, do not accept contradictions, seek God's answers, He will give it.
Now I will list a few things that might peak your interest if you are an avid Eschatological type person. Maybe we can kick it around a bit.
1.) The Seals are not Judgments or Wrath but are instead Jesus prophesying soon to come events, just like Joel 2:31 did 2500 years ago. In other words both Joel and the 6th Seal are pointing to the Trumpet Judgments, and Trump #4 fulfills both.
2.) The 1335, 1290 and 1260 are all "Events" that happen that many number of days "Before all these Wonders End" at the 2nd coming of Jesus. Thus the 1260 is last, the 1290 comes 30 days before that and the 1335 comes first, the 2nd coming is the fulcrum point.
The 1335 is the Two-witnesses Blessing
The 1290 can not be the A.C. but is the F.P 2nd Beast
The 1260 is the A.C. who rules for only 1260 days
3.) Matt. 24:4-14 has nothing to do with the End Times
4.) The A.C. only Conquers the Mediterranean Sea Region, and is the President of the E.U. and has to be Greek born as Dan. 8:9 mandates and has to come to political power in the E.U. as Dan. 7:7-8 mandates, AND lastly has to have Assyrian bloodlines according to Isaiah 10. So, this man will have Turkish/Iraqi Assyrian blood, be born in Greece who has a common border with Turkey, and he must become the E.U. President. He never conquers the whole world, but instead the whole earth being spoken about. This is easily provable.
5.) The Remnant spoken of in Rev. 12:17 can not be Jewish, its the Remnant Gentile Church on earth after the pre trib rapture.
6.) Those who come out of great tribulation in Rev. 7:9-16 are the pre trib raptured church, in John 16:33 Jesus told us all time on earth is troubles. No one gets raptured during the 70th week, so says Seal #5 and Rev. 20:4
7.) The 144,000 like the 10 Virgin Brides is a reference code. The number 10 means completeness, so the 10 virgin brides equal the complete church, and they are not, of course, only women, they are men , women children. Likewise, the 144,000 is also a code, the number is equal to 12 (Fulness) x 12 x 10 (completion) x 10 x 10 which is 144,000, but it means ALL Israel who repents, and Zech. 13:8-9 tells us that is a 1/3 of all Jews or 5 million Jews who repent and flee Judea.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:37 am to CatholicLSUDude
Dude, don't interrupt a fine Catholic Hate thread here on Political Talk.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:58 am to catholictigerfan
quote:
It's ironic actually, when it comes to American politics we never trust main stream media, but when it comes to reporting on the church we seem to take it as Gospe
Especially the Catholic Church. Makes you think satan is behind this.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:37 am to TTOWN RONMON
quote:
peak your interest if you are an avid Eschatological type person.
What people don't seem to realize is that, while using complex words that make them look learned, misuse of very simple terms ruins the whole effect and makes the author look like a clown.
Is it peaked, peeked or piqued?
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:42 am to BamaCoaster
So true. Truth is what exits without or before “man”. Once something becomes “organized” mankind often pollutes or perverts it to maintain power. Evolution is one thing. Doctrinal change is ma made.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 12:16 pm to CatholicLSUDude
It makes you wonder if satan is behind all of this and unfortunately a lot of Protestants on this board fall for the lies.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 12:20 pm to bleedpg
quote:
It makes you wonder if satan is behind all of this and unfortunately a lot of Protestants on this board fall for the lies.
Man, Catholics are so lost it grieves my soul. You people really have no idea what way is up.
If you truly sought the Lord and a relationship with Him and not with traditions of men, you'd...well, I guess that wouldn't make you Catholic.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 12:46 pm to DiamondDog
When Catholics stop listening to the Vatican maybe we can reclaim what Jesus wanted. Jesus didn’t need billions of dollars, grand buildings and a huge bureaucracy setting out highly controlling rules and regulations that restrict religious freedom, to advance his ministry from God.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 12:54 pm to Sixafan
No, you see...Jesus came to earth, died and rose again...so he can have some old man elected by a bunch of older men, sit on a throne in a funky looking hat and tell you what to do for the rest of your life.
How much sense does that make?
How much sense does that make?
This post was edited on 12/25/23 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 12/25/23 at 1:12 pm to CatholicLSUDude
My belief is Pope Francis is one of the worst popes in Catholic history. We have had bad popes before who have had mistresses and other moral problems. This pope is using weaponized ambiguity to cause a crisis of faith among many Catholics. He is specifically going after orthodox Catholics who are the most loyal of his flock. He consistently is conforming the Catholic Church to fit the morals of the world. Pope Francis has done so much damage to the Church that he will have to account for.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 1:35 pm to CatholicLSUDude
What an excellent example of sophistry. They are dressing the document up to look good with good words, but the practical application is definitely approving of the sinful act.
If there's going to be no blessing of the "union", then there's no reason for any document. Remember, James Martin (pro homosexual cleric) himself is claiming this is definitely a big change in the Church.
So sad they choose Christmas to do this too....
If there's going to be no blessing of the "union", then there's no reason for any document. Remember, James Martin (pro homosexual cleric) himself is claiming this is definitely a big change in the Church.
So sad they choose Christmas to do this too....
Posted on 12/25/23 at 2:53 pm to CatholicLSUDude
I don't like this Pope, he's a pathetic liberal to me overall, but the RCC carried the Gospel to the world for the first 1000 to 1200 years via the Latin Vulgate before other bibles were created.
So, those who call the RCC the Harlot are just not in the know, they do not think things through. I chastise all those who claim the RCC is the Harlot or Beast, and who say the Pope is the False Prophet because that has to be a Jewish High Priest like unto Jason (real name Yeshua) under Antiochus Epiphanes. Those two were the shadows for the coming A.C. & F.P.
They are pretenders via Eschatology.
So, those who call the RCC the Harlot are just not in the know, they do not think things through. I chastise all those who claim the RCC is the Harlot or Beast, and who say the Pope is the False Prophet because that has to be a Jewish High Priest like unto Jason (real name Yeshua) under Antiochus Epiphanes. Those two were the shadows for the coming A.C. & F.P.
They are pretenders via Eschatology.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 2:57 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Its whatever you want it to be. I understand you were probably lost in that post so you choose to make an irrelevant point.
I usually just ignore these types replies tbh. Hope springs eternal.
I usually just ignore these types replies tbh. Hope springs eternal.
This post was edited on 12/25/23 at 7:56 pm
Posted on 12/25/23 at 6:19 pm to TTOWN RONMON
Revelation 1:19
19 Write therefore the things that you have seen, those that are and those that are to take place after this.
I’m not a preterits, so I don’t think all the things from Revelation have already transpired, but like this verse suggest, some of the things John saw had already passed, some were going on currently in his life and other things were in his future.
19 Write therefore the things that you have seen, those that are and those that are to take place after this.
I’m not a preterits, so I don’t think all the things from Revelation have already transpired, but like this verse suggest, some of the things John saw had already passed, some were going on currently in his life and other things were in his future.
This post was edited on 12/25/23 at 6:39 pm
Posted on 12/25/23 at 7:35 pm to DiamondDog
Posted on 12/25/23 at 7:42 pm to Champagne
So you link me Catholic articles as proof of Catholic doctrinal fact.
You're either simple or a really bad troll.
You're either simple or a really bad troll.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 7:45 pm to DiamondDog
quote:
So you link me Catholic articles as proof of Catholic doctrinal fact.
I too was amazed that a Catholic apologists would validate that the early church was Catholic!
This post was edited on 12/25/23 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 12/25/23 at 7:54 pm to Revelator
The Nativity of our Lord Jesus Christ
The Twenty-fifth Day of December,
when ages beyond number had run their course
from the creation of the world,
when God in the beginning created heaven and earth,
and formed man in his own likeness;
when century upon century had passed
since the Almighty set his bow in the clouds after the Great Flood,
as a sign of covenant and peace;
in the twenty-first century since Abraham, our father in faith,
came out of Ur of the Chaldees;
in the thirteenth century since the People of Israel were led by Moses
in the Exodus from Egypt;
around the thousandth year since David was anointed King;
in the sixty-fifth week of the prophecy of Daniel;
in the one hundred and ninety-fourth Olympiad;
in the year seven hundred and fifty-two
since the foundation of the City of Rome;
in the forty-second year of the reign of Caesar Octavian Augustus,
the whole world being at peace,
JESUS CHRIST, eternal God and Son of the eternal Father,
desiring to consecrate the world by his most loving presence,
was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
and when nine months had passed since his conception,
was born of the Virgin Mary in Bethlehem of Judah,
and was made man:
The Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ according to the flesh.
The Twenty-fifth Day of December,
when ages beyond number had run their course
from the creation of the world,
when God in the beginning created heaven and earth,
and formed man in his own likeness;
when century upon century had passed
since the Almighty set his bow in the clouds after the Great Flood,
as a sign of covenant and peace;
in the twenty-first century since Abraham, our father in faith,
came out of Ur of the Chaldees;
in the thirteenth century since the People of Israel were led by Moses
in the Exodus from Egypt;
around the thousandth year since David was anointed King;
in the sixty-fifth week of the prophecy of Daniel;
in the one hundred and ninety-fourth Olympiad;
in the year seven hundred and fifty-two
since the foundation of the City of Rome;
in the forty-second year of the reign of Caesar Octavian Augustus,
the whole world being at peace,
JESUS CHRIST, eternal God and Son of the eternal Father,
desiring to consecrate the world by his most loving presence,
was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
and when nine months had passed since his conception,
was born of the Virgin Mary in Bethlehem of Judah,
and was made man:
The Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ according to the flesh.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 7:55 pm to Guntoter1
quote:
The Nativity of our Lord Jesus Christ
The Twenty-fifth Day of December,
when ages beyond number had run their course
from the creation of the world,
when God in the beginning created heaven and earth,
and formed man in his own likeness;
when century upon century had passed
since the Almighty set his bow in the clouds after the Great Flood,
as a sign of covenant and peace;
in the twenty-first century since Abraham, our father in faith,
came out of Ur of the Chaldees;
in the thirteenth century since the People of Israel were led by Moses
in the Exodus from Egypt;
around the thousandth year since David was anointed King;
in the sixty-fifth week of the prophecy of Daniel;
in the one hundred and ninety-fourth Olympiad;
in the year seven hundred and fifty-two
since the foundation of the City of Rome;
in the forty-second year of the reign of Caesar Octavian Augustus,
the whole world being at peace,
JESUS CHRIST, eternal God and Son of the eternal Father,
desiring to consecrate the world by his most loving presence,
was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
and when nine months had passed since his conception,
was born of the Virgin Mary in Bethlehem of Judah,
and was made man:
The Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ according to the flesh.
my favorite part of the Christmas celebration!
Merry Christmas!
Popular
Back to top


5


