re: Pope Leo: ‘God does not bless any conflict’

quote:

---

Muslims worship the god of Abraham, just like Jews and Christians.

---

Did the God that the muslims worship send his only Son as a payment for our sins so that we not suffer eternal damnation in hell? If not, then no, they don't.

quote:

---

I’ve laid it out pretty clearly in plenty of threads in the past. If you can’t see it all on your own that’s on you.

---

You've actually done no such thing.

The ONLY thing you've done is crap on all protestant denominations in an effort to make yourself feel superior for being a catholic. Nothing else.

quote:

---

If you study hard enough, you’ll see the only possible options are Catholicism or orthodoxy.

---

Yeah.. no. Just no. Please tell me using only the Bible, as no other source is necessary... why my church (Southern Baptist) is NOT an option and why I'm a heretic. Not in your opinion, but straight out of the bible.

See... you believe in the Eucharist. That's fine. Nothing wrong with that.

I believe in communion... and according to you that's not fine and makes me a heretic.

See the difference there?

In the end... neither viewpoint will keep us out of or get us into Heaven.

And I fear discussions of this type might cause someone new in the faith to get confused... and lose their way... they serve no purpose other than for us to get in the weeds and argue doctrine, not the overall big picture, as it were.

At the end of the day, we are on the same team.

Peter is not singled out as an individual, his confession of faith was acknowledged. Christ singled out the faith of individuals pretty frequently but never singled out individuals. So, when Jesus stated many times that he was the head of the Church and was going to die for it, was he confused? The early Church absolutely lacked the kind of structure implemented by the Catholic Church. It’s not even debatable. Paul wrote about qualifications for Church leadership not Peter. As far as unified doctrine goes, the early Church absolutely did not show a unified doctrine and Paul admonished Peter for not supporting a unified doctrine with the Jewish converts. Not only was he admonished in public but he was admonished for leading others astray lol the letters to the other Churches plainly show a pattern of a lack of cohesion

I used to believe this. It’s not a viable option. Sorry.

lol. Sweet Chat GPT post.

That reading obviously skips some key details in John 6. Yes, Jesus uses metaphors elsewhere, but when people misunderstand Him in John, He normally clarifies. Here He does the opposite. When they take Him literally and are shocked, He doubles down, even switching to more graphic language about eating His flesh and drinking His blood. Then many disciples leave, and He lets them go instead of correcting them. That’s not how He handles metaphors anywhere else.

John 6:63 also doesn’t mean what you’re saying. “The flesh counts for nothing” can’t mean His own flesh, because just a few verses earlier He says His flesh is “for the life of the world.” He’s contrasting fallen human understanding with the Spirit, not denying the reality of what He just taught.

And this isn’t just John 6 in isolation. At the Last Supper He says “this is my body,” not “this represents my body,” and Paul warns in 1 Corinthians 11 that receiving unworthily profanes the body and blood of the Lord. That only makes sense if something real is there, not just symbolism.

So the issue isn’t inconsistency, it’s whether you follow the passage all the way through. The literal reading actually fits the text better, especially when you take John 6, the Last Supper, and Paul together.

Last rallying of the papal armed forces during Italian unification wars in late 1800s


Oh, and that bible quote "A time to love, And a time to hate; [embed]A time of war[/embed], And a time of peace".

I wholeheartedly agree that we are on the same team. Unfortunately, the common theme on here lately has been pretty harsh and straight up evil the way some of our Protestant brothers are talking about Catholics. Apologies if I came off as harsh, but I’m kind of tired of it.

quote:

---

Unfortunately, the common theme on here lately has been pretty harsh and straight up evil the way some of our Protestant brothers are talking about Catholics. Apologies if I came off as harsh, but I’m kind of tired of it.

---

How can you say that when you are in here slamming anyone who is not Catholic?

quote:

---

As for those Catholics that vote for abortion or LGBTQ… They are not Catholics.

---

Pope Francis called Biden a "good catholic," advocated for him to receive communion in the US, and received communion when he visited the papacy last.

I sympathize for real Catholics, it is just a shame how far the institution has fallen

quote:

---

Muslims worship the god of Abraham, just like Jews and Christians.

---

They might claim that, but in practice what they believe is their god is very, very different.

quote:

---

In Islam, Allah is a projection of Muhammad’s own will, a tribal warlord sanctified in the heavens.

The god of Islam is not a transcendent being who calls men to rise above their nature, he is a divine version of everything man is at his worst: lustful, possessive, vengeful, violent, and endlessly deceitful.

He rewards obedience not with his presence, but with sex, conquest, and domination.

His “paradise” is a brothel in the sky. His justice is rooted in favoritism and terror. His love is conditional, his mercy arbitrary, and his threats eternal.

He speaks more of punishment than peace, more of submission than salvation.

His scripture glorifies deception (“Allah is the best of deceivers”), sanctions slavery, blesses violence, and encourages self-destruction in the name of glory.

Yet, this god demands to be worshipped, not understood. Feared, not known. You do not reason with him. You do not question him. You submit.

Muhammad’s god serves one ultimate purpose: to reflect and empower Muhammad’s own desires, political, sexual, and military.

Every “revelation” comes conveniently in step with his personal ambitions:

justifying his marriages, excusing his violence, protecting his ego, or consolidating his control.

This is not a God who transforms the human heart. This is a god who amplifies its worst instincts.

The God of Scripture descends in humility, entering history not to conquer empires, but to conquer sin and death. He calls His followers to love their enemies, to forgive the undeserving, to serve without reward.

He values the broken, restores the fallen, and grants dignity to the outcast. He invites humanity to walk with Him, not just kneel before Him.

The god of Muhammad offers none of this. He demands fear. He demands allegiance. He demands death to those who will not conform.

He is not Father, he is Master, his followers are not children, they are tools, martyrs, and soldiers.

The result of this theology is a civilization shaped not by the imitation of God, but by the deification of a man.

The biblical God is the standard we rise to meet. The Islamic god is the mirror that justifies who we already are.

One calls man upward. The other pulls him downward, wrapping his worst instincts in religious language, and calling it righteousness.

---